Literature DB >> 19125032

Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate.

Terence W Picton1, Patricia van Roon, M Sasha John.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how the amplitudes and latencies of auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) to multiple stimuli presented at rates between 80 and 101 Hz vary with the ear of stimulation, the handedness or gender of a subject, and the rate and intensity of the stimuli.
DESIGN: ASSRs were recorded in a group of 56 young adults (27 females, 13 left handed) using several stimulus conditions. In the two main conditions, four sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones (each uniquely modulated using rates between 80 and 105 Hz) with carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, were presented concurrently to each ear (eight total). In the first condition the modulation rates for the left ear were slower than those for the right and in the second condition this relationship was reversed. Other conditions evaluated the responses to single stimuli, to multiple stimuli presented in one ear only and to multiple stimuli presented dichotically (four in each ear) with rates that decreased rather than increased with increasing carrier frequency. Stimuli were presented at an intensity of 73 dB SPL except in two conditions wherein the intensity was 53 dB SPL.
RESULTS: At 73 dB SPL, multiple-stimulus ASSRs were significantly reduced (monotic or dichotic) compared with single-stimulus ASSRs, especially at 1000 and 2000 Hz. There were significant differences between monotic and dichotic stimulation. When the stimuli were presented dichotically, the amplitude of the response varied with the relative rates of modulation for the stimuli presented in each ear. ASSRs were larger in the ear with the higher rate when the carrier frequencies were 500 and 1000 Hz and when the modulation rates were <90 Hz. There were no consistent effects of gender or ear of stimulation. There were also no significant effects of handedness.
CONCLUSIONS: Presenting multiple stimuli at 73 dB SPL in the same ear decreases the amplitude of the ASSR compared with when the stimuli are presented singly. This is caused by the masking effect of low on higher carrier frequencies and some other inhibitory effect of high on lower frequencies. Dichotic stimulation can increase the amplitude of the response to stimuli modulated more rapidly (and concomitantly decrease the responses to the stimuli modulated more slowly). This effect occurs only for carrier frequencies <2000 Hz and for modulation frequencies <90 Hz. Dichotic stimulation also causes a small but highly significant decrease in the latency of the response compared with monotic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125032     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819003ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  9 in total

1.  Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemahmad; Saeid Farahani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Noise-induced enhancement of envelope following responses in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Samuel Y Gordon; Garnett P McMillan; Frederick J Gallun; Michelle R Molis; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of degree and symmetricity of bilateral spectral smearing, carrier frequency, and subject sex on amplitude of evoked auditory steady-state response signal.

Authors:  Jong Ho Hwang; Kyoung Won Nam; Dong Pyo Jang; In Young Kim
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Wafaa A Kaf; Ali A Danesh; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Auditory steady-state responses in school-aged children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Luciana Macedo de Resende; Sirley Alves da Silva Carvalho; Thamara Suzi Dos Santos; Filipe Ibraim Abdo; Matheus Romão; Marcela Cristina Ferreira; Carlos Julio Tierra-Criollo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Longitudinal Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Preterm and Term Infants: The Maturation Process.

Authors:  Ana Constantino Sousa; Dayane Domeneghini Didoné; Pricila Sleifer
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-01

7.  Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part I: Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Jan Wouters; Tom Francart
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Bernardo Faria Ramos; Signe Schuster Grasel; Henrique Faria Ramos; Maria Flávia Bonadia B de Moraes; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

9.  Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds.

Authors:  Bahram Jalaei; Moslem Shaabani; Mohd Normani Zakaria
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.