Literature DB >> 9390836

Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.

D R Stapells1, P Oates.   

Abstract

This review paper briefly considers how stimulus, noise masking and recording parameters affect the frequency and place specificity of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to air- and bone-conducted stimuli. Issues concerning the use of clicks for ABR threshold estimates will first be presented, followed by results for tone-evoked ABR thresholds and how well they predict the pure-tone behavioral audiogram. Noise-masking options (e.g. high-pass noise, notched noise and white noise) to improve the frequency specificity of tone-evoked ABRs, which are now available on clinical ABR units, will also be discussed. The goal of this article is to demonstrate that ABRs to tonal stimuli can be successfully recorded in most clinical environments and can provide reasonably accurate estimates of 500- to 4000-Hz pure-tone behavioral thresholds in infants, children and adults. Specific parameters and protocols for obtaining frequency-specific ABR threshold responses are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9390836     DOI: 10.1159/000259252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  35 in total

1.  Ultrasonic singing by the blue-throated hummingbird: a comparison between production and perception.

Authors:  Carolyn L Pytte; Millicent S Ficken; Andrew Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Immediate manifestation of acoustic trauma in the auditory cortex is layer specific and cell type dependent.

Authors:  Ondřej Novák; Ondřej Zelenka; Tomáš Hromádka; Josef Syka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; A Neumann; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Assessment: scientific foundation.

Authors:  R J Nozza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

5.  Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemahmad; Saeid Farahani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  [Correlation of pure tone thresholds and hearing loss for numbers. Comparison of three calculation variations for plausibility checking in expertise].

Authors:  T Braun; S Dochtermann; E Krause; M Schmidt; K Schorn; J M Hempel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Auditory brainstem responses and auditory thresholds in woodpeckers.

Authors:  Bernard Lohr; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: issues unique to the under-1 population.

Authors:  Maura Cosetti; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-03

9.  Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex vs. auditory brainstem response for hearing assessment.

Authors:  R J Longenecker; F Alghamdi; M J Rosen; A V Galazyuk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.