Literature DB >> 31115459

Dynamic modeling of nutrient use and individual requirements of lactating sows1.

Raphaël Gauthier1, Christine Largouët2,3, Charlotte Gaillard1, Laetitia Cloutier4, Frédéric Guay5, Jean-Yves Dourmad1.   

Abstract

Nutrient requirements of sows during lactation are related mainly to their milk yield and feed intake, and vary greatly among individuals. In practice, nutrient requirements are generally determined at the population level based on average performance. The objective of the present modeling approach was to explore the variability in nutrient requirements among sows by combining current knowledge about nutrient use with on-farm data available on sows at farrowing [parity, BW, backfat thickness (BT)] and their individual performance (litter size, litter average daily gain, daily sow feed intake) to estimate nutrient requirements. The approach was tested on a database of 1,450 lactations from 2 farms. The effects of farm (A, B), week of lactation (W1: week 1, W2: week 2, W3+: week 3 and beyond), and parity (P1: 1, P2: 2, P3+: 3 and beyond) on sow performance and their nutrient requirements were evaluated. The mean daily ME requirement was strongly correlated with litter growth (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001) and varied slightly according to sow BW, which influenced the maintenance cost. The mean daily standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine requirement was influenced by farm, week of lactation, and parity. Variability in SID lysine requirement per kg feed was related mainly to feed intake (R2 = 0.51; P < 0.001) and, to a smaller extent, litter growth (R2 = 0.27; P < 0.001). It was lowest in W1 (7.0 g/kg), greatest in W2 (7.9 g/kg), and intermediate in W3+ (7.5 g/kg; P < 0.001) because milk production increased faster than feed intake capacity did. It was lower for P3+ (6.7 g/kg) and P2 sows (7.3 g/kg) than P1 sows (8.3 g/kg) due to the greater feed intake of multiparous sows. The SID lysine requirement per kg of feed was met for 80% of sows when supplies were 112 and 120% of the mean population requirement on farm A and B, respectively, indicating higher variability in requirements on farm B. Other amino acid and mineral requirements were influenced in the same way as SID lysine. The present modeling approach allows to capture individual variability in the performance of sows and litters according to farm, stage of lactation, and parity. It is an initial step in the development of new types of models able to process historical farm data (e.g., for ex post assessment of nutrient requirements) and real-time data (e.g., to control precision feeding).
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amino acids; feed intake; milk production; mineral; model; sow

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31115459      PMCID: PMC6606508          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  MACROSCOPIC OBSERVATIONS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE TRACT OF THE SOW DURING LACTATION AND EARLY POSTWEANING.

Authors:  W M PALMER; H S TEAGUE; W G VENZKE
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  A V Hansen; A B Strathe; E Kebreab; J France; P K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Development of sustainable precision farming systems for swine: estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  L Hauschild; P A Lovatto; J Pomar; C Pomar
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Computer simulation model of swine production systems: II. Modeling body composition and weight of female pigs, fetal development, milk production, and growth of suckling pigs.

Authors:  C Pomar; D L Harris; F Minvielle
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Energy utilization in pregnant and lactating sows: modeling of energy requirements.

Authors:  J Noblet; J Y Dourmad; M Etienne
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Determination of protein and amino acid requirements of lactating sows using a population-based factorial approach.

Authors:  A V Strathe; A B Strathe; P K Theil; C F Hansen; E Kebreab
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of sow and litter characteristics on colostrum yield, time for onset of lactation, and milk yield of sows.

Authors:  C N Vadmand; U Krogh; C F Hansen; P K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Modelling the variation in performance of a population of growing pig as affected by lysine supply and feeding strategy.

Authors:  L Brossard; J-Y Dourmad; J Rivest; J van Milgen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of a method estimating real-time individual lysine requirements in two lines of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  L Cloutier; C Pomar; M P Létourneau Montminy; J F Bernier; J Pomar
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of dietary energy intake during gestation and lactation on milk yield and composition of first, second and fourth parity sows.

Authors:  Manfred Beyer; Werner Jentsch; Siegfried Kuhla; Hildegard Wittenburg; Fred Kreienbring; Helmut Scholze; Paul E Rudolph; Cornelia C Metges
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.242

View more
  7 in total

1.  Exploration of individual variability to better predict the nutrient requirements of gestating sows1.

Authors:  Charlotte Gaillard; Raphaël Gauthier; Laetitia Cloutier; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: limitations and potential next steps for modeling and modelers in the animal sciences.

Authors:  Marc Jacobs; Aline Remus; Charlotte Gaillard; Hector M Menendez; Luis O Tedeschi; Suresh Neethirajan; Jennifer L Ellis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Optimal lysine in diets for high-yielding lactating sows1.

Authors:  Camilla K Hojgaard; Thomas S Bruun; Peter K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Dietary Phosphorus and Calcium Utilization in Growing Pigs: Requirements and Improvements.

Authors:  Marion Lautrou; Agnès Narcy; Jean-Yves Dourmad; Candido Pomar; Philippe Schmidely; Marie-Pierre Létourneau Montminy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 5.  ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.

Authors:  Hector M Menendez; Jameson R Brennan; Charlotte Gaillard; Krista Ehlert; Jaelyn Quintana; Suresh Neethirajan; Aline Remus; Marc Jacobs; Izabelle A M A Teixeira; Benjamin L Turner; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

6.  Precision feeding of lactating sows: implementation and evaluation of a decision support system in farm conditions.

Authors:  Raphaël Gauthier; Christine Largouët; Dan Bussières; Jean-Philippe Martineau; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

7.  Evaluation of a decision support system for precision feeding of gestating sows.

Authors:  Charlotte Gaillard; Nathalie Quiniou; Raphaël Gauthier; Laetitia Cloutier; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.