Literature DB >> 18069617

Effects of dietary energy intake during gestation and lactation on milk yield and composition of first, second and fourth parity sows.

Manfred Beyer1, Werner Jentsch, Siegfried Kuhla, Hildegard Wittenburg, Fred Kreienbring, Helmut Scholze, Paul E Rudolph, Cornelia C Metges.   

Abstract

In order to determine the effects of a varied level of dietary energy intake during pregnancy and lactation on milk yield and composition, first, second and fourth parity sows (Large White x German Landrace) were provided with energy at a level of either: (i) 100% of ME requirement (MEreq) during pregnancy and lactation, (ii) 120% MEreq during pregnancy and 80% during lactation, and (iii) 80% MEreq during pregnancy and 120% during lactation. In spite of equal target levels feed analysis revealed that gestating first parity sows with 120/80 treatment combination and lactating sows of 80/120 treatment combination received 25, and 11-17% more digestible N than in the respective 100/100 treatment combination. Irrespective of this 120/80 sows responded with the highest milk DM, fat, and energy contents, and the lowest lactose concentrations whereas protein levels where not affected, irrespective of parity (p < 0.05). Milk yield of sows in 1st and 4th lactation was 85 and 106% of that in 2nd lactation, respectively. Average milk composition was 18.1% DM, 4.9% protein, 6.8% fat, 5.6% lactose, and 0.8% ash. Milk composition changes ceased at day 7 of lactation with a reduction of milk GE and protein, and an increase of lactose content. Concentrations of threonine, arginine, valine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, cystine, and tryptophan, as well as stearic, oleic, and linoleic acid were higher in colostrum than in milk at later lactation stages. In contrast, laurine, myristic, palmitic, and palmitoleic acids were lower concentrated in colostrum. In conclusion, these results illustrate the importance of body reserve mobilization for milk production in sows and indicate that low energy supply during gestation cannot be compensated by higher energy supply during lactation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18069617     DOI: 10.1080/17450390701563433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr        ISSN: 1477-2817            Impact factor:   2.242


  17 in total

1.  Effect of increasing dietary energy density during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, piglet vitality, and lifetime growth of offspring.

Authors:  Hazel B Rooney; Keelin O'driscoll; John V O'doherty; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Panagiotis Sakkas; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Dynamic modeling of nutrient use and individual requirements of lactating sows1.

Authors:  Raphaël Gauthier; Christine Largouët; Charlotte Gaillard; Laetitia Cloutier; Frédéric Guay; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Poorer lifetime growth performance of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny is largely due to weight differences at birth and reduced growth in the preweaning period, and is not improved by progeny segregation after weaning.

Authors:  J R Craig; C L Collins; K L Bunter; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The Impact of Enhancing Diet Quality or Dietary Supplementation of Flavor and Multi-Enzymes on Primiparous Lactating Sows.

Authors:  Li Zhe; Rui Zhou; Peter Kappel Theil; Uffe Krogh; Lunxiang Yang; Yong Zhuo; Yan Lin; Shengyu Xu; Xuemei Jiang; Lingjie Huang; Lianqiang Che; Bin Feng; Zhengfeng Fang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Dam parity structure and body condition during lactation influence piglet growth and gilt sexual maturation through pre-finishing.

Authors:  Lea A Rempel; Brittney N Keel; William T Oliver; James E Wells; Clay A Lents; Dan J Nonneman; Gary A Rohrer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

7.  The effect of characteristics of proteins fed during gestation and lactation on development of metabolic syndrome in dams and male offspring of Wistar rats.

Authors:  A Jahan-Mihan; C A Labyak; A Y Arikawa
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2017-03-10

8.  The effect of the ratio of standardized ileal digestible lysine to metabolizable energy on growth performance, blood metabolites and hormones of lactating sows.

Authors:  Lingfeng Xue; Xiangshu Piao; Defa Li; Pengfei Li; Rongfei Zhang; Sung Woo Kim; Bing Dong
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-27

9.  Risk factors and epidemiological characteristics of new neonatal porcine diarrhoea syndrome in four Danish herds.

Authors:  Hanne Kongsted; Nils Toft; Jens Peter Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 10.  The Role of Maternal Dietary Proteins in Development of Metabolic Syndrome in Offspring.

Authors:  Alireza Jahan-Mihan; Judith Rodriguez; Catherine Christie; Marjan Sadeghi; Tara Zerbe
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.