Literature DB >> 31608374

Exploration of individual variability to better predict the nutrient requirements of gestating sows1.

Charlotte Gaillard1, Raphaël Gauthier1, Laetitia Cloutier2, Jean-Yves Dourmad1.   

Abstract

Sows often receive the same feed during gestation even though their nutrient requirements vary during gestation and among sows. The objective of this study was to report the variability in nutrient requirement among sows and during gestation, in order to develop a precision feeding approach. A data set of 2,511 gestations reporting sow characteristics at insemination and their farrowing performance was used as an input for a Python model, adapted from InraPorc, predicting nutrient requirement during gestation. Total metabolizable energy (ME) requirement increased with increasing litter size, gestation weeks, and parity (30.6, 33.6, and 35.5 MJ/d for parity 1, 2, and 3 and beyond, respectively, P < 0.01). Standardized ileal digestible lysine (SID Lys) requirement per kg of diet increased from weeks 1 to 6 of gestation, remained stable from weeks 7 to 10, and increased again from week 11 until the end of gestation (P < 0.01). Average Lys requirement increased with increasing litter size (SID Lys: 3.00, 3.27, 3.50 g/kg for small, medium and large litters, P < 0.01) and decreased when parity increased (SID Lys: 3.61, 3.17, 2.84 g/kg for parity 1, 2, and 3++, P < 0.01). Standardized total tract digestible phosphorus (STTD-P) and total calcium (Total-Ca) requirements markedly increased after week 9, with litter size, and decreased when parity increased (STTD-P: 1.36 vs. 1.31 g/kg for parity 1 and parity 3 and beyond; Total-Ca: 4.28 vs. 4.10 g/kg for parity 1 and parity 3 and beyond, P < 0.01). Based on empirical cumulative distribution functions, a 4-diets strategy, varying in SID Lys and STTD-P content according to parity and gestation period (P1 from weeks 0 to 11, P2 from weeks 12 to 17), may be put forward to meet the requirements of 90% of the sows (2 diets for multiparous sows: P1: 2.8 g SID Lys/kg and 1.1 g STTD-P/kg; P2: 4.5 g SID Lys/kg and 2.3 g STTD-P/kg; and 2 diets for primiparous sows: P1: 3.4 g SID Lys/kg and 1.1g STTD-P/kg; P2: 5.0 g SID Lys/kg, 2.2 g STTD-P/kg). Better considering the high variability of sow requirement should thus make it possible to optimize their performance whilst reducing feeding cost and excretion. Feeding sows closer to their requirement may initially be achieved by grouping and feeding sows according to gestation week and parity, and ultimately by feeding sows individually using a smart feeder allowing the mixing of different feeds differing in their nutrient content.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gestation; individual variability; modeling; nutrition; requirements; sow

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31608374      PMCID: PMC6915206          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Dynamic modeling of nutrient use and individual requirements of lactating sows1.

Authors:  Raphaël Gauthier; Christine Largouët; Charlotte Gaillard; Laetitia Cloutier; Frédéric Guay; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of temperature and temperature-humidity index on the reproductive performance of sows during summer months under a temperate climate.

Authors:  Kerstin Wegner; Christian Lambertz; Gürbüz Das; Gerald Reiner; Matthias Gauly
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 1.749

3.  Feeding behavior of growing-finishing pigs reared under precision feeding strategies.

Authors:  I Andretta; C Pomar; M Kipper; L Hauschild; J Rivest
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Effect of protein and lysine levels in the diet on body gain composition and energy utilization in growing pigs.

Authors:  J Noblet; Y Henry; S Dubois
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The threonine requirement of sows increases in late gestation.

Authors:  C L Levesque; S Moehn; P B Pencharz; R O Ball
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.

Authors:  A Fangmann; R A Sharifi; J Heinkel; K Danowski; H Schrade; M Erbe; H Simianer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Evaluation of a method estimating real-time individual lysine requirements in two lines of growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  L Cloutier; C Pomar; M P Létourneau Montminy; J F Bernier; J Pomar
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interrelationships between dietary protein level, energy intake, and nitrogen retention in pregnant gilts.

Authors:  R H King; W G Brown
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effects of a controlled heat stress during late gestation, lactation, and after weaning on thermoregulation, metabolism, and reproduction of primiparous sows.

Authors:  A M Williams; T J Safranski; D E Spiers; P A Eichen; E A Coate; M C Lucy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Phosphorus and Calcium Utilization in Growing Pigs: Requirements and Improvements.

Authors:  Marion Lautrou; Agnès Narcy; Jean-Yves Dourmad; Candido Pomar; Philippe Schmidely; Marie-Pierre Létourneau Montminy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 2.  ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.

Authors:  Hector M Menendez; Jameson R Brennan; Charlotte Gaillard; Krista Ehlert; Jaelyn Quintana; Suresh Neethirajan; Aline Remus; Marc Jacobs; Izabelle A M A Teixeira; Benjamin L Turner; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Evaluation of a decision support system for precision feeding of gestating sows.

Authors:  Charlotte Gaillard; Nathalie Quiniou; Raphaël Gauthier; Laetitia Cloutier; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.