Literature DB >> 35419602

ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: limitations and potential next steps for modeling and modelers in the animal sciences.

Marc Jacobs1, Aline Remus2, Charlotte Gaillard3, Hector M Menendez4, Luis O Tedeschi5, Suresh Neethirajan6, Jennifer L Ellis7.   

Abstract

The field of animal science, and especially animal nutrition, relies heavily on modeling to accomplish its day-to-day objectives. New data streams ("big data") and the exponential increase in computing power have allowed the appearance of "new" modeling methodologies, under the umbrella of artificial intelligence (AI). However, many of these modeling methodologies have been around for decades. According to Gartner, technological innovation follows five distinct phases: technology trigger, peak of inflated expectations, trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment, and plateau of productivity. The appearance of AI certainly elicited much hype within agriculture leading to overpromised plug-and-play solutions in a field heavily dependent on custom solutions. The threat of failure can become real when advertising a disruptive innovation as sustainable. This does not mean that we need to abandon AI models. What is most necessary is to demystify the field and place a lesser emphasis on the technology and more on business application. As AI becomes increasingly more powerful and applications start to diverge, new research fields are introduced, and opportunities arise to combine "old" and "new" modeling technologies into hybrids. However, sustainable application is still many years away, and companies and universities alike do well to remain at the forefront. This requires investment in hardware, software, and analytical talent. It also requires a strong connection to the outside world to test, that which does, and does not work in practice and a close view of when the field of agriculture is ready to take its next big steps. Other research fields, such as engineering and automotive, have shown that the application power of AI can be far reaching but only if a realistic view of models as whole is maintained. In this review, we share our view on the current and future limitations of modeling and potential next steps for modelers in the animal sciences. First, we discuss the inherent dependencies and limitations of modeling as a human process. Then, we highlight how models, fueled by AI, can play an enhanced sustainable role in the animal sciences ecosystem. Lastly, we provide recommendations for future animal scientists on how to support themselves, the farmers, and their field, considering the opportunities and challenges the technological innovation brings.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data science; education; modeling; precision livestock farming; simulation; smart livestock farming

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35419602      PMCID: PMC9171330          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  54 in total

1.  Quantification of the main digestive processes in ruminants: the equations involved in the renewed energy and protein feed evaluation systems.

Authors:  D Sauvant; P Nozière
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A method to estimate cow potential and subsequent responses to energy and protein supply according to stage of lactation.

Authors:  J B Daniel; N C Friggens; H Van Laar; C P Ferris; D Sauvant
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Comparing the Influence of Simulated Experimental Errors on 12 Machine Learning Algorithms in Bioactivity Modeling Using 12 Diverse Data Sets.

Authors:  Isidro Cortes-Ciriano; Andreas Bender; Thérèse E Malliavin
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Review: Synergy between mechanistic modelling and data-driven models for modern animal production systems in the era of big data.

Authors:  J L Ellis; M Jacobs; J Dijkstra; H van Laar; J P Cant; D Tulpan; N Ferguson
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in cancer research: learning at different levels of data granularity.

Authors:  Davide Cirillo; Iker Núñez-Carpintero; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Emerging Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in the Feed Efficiency of Livestock Species.

Authors:  Guoyu Hu; Duy Ngoc Do; Pourya Davoudi; Younes Miar
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer M Tetzlaff; An-Wen Chan; Jessica Kitchen; Margaret Sampson; Andrea C Tricco; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-24

8.  Recording behaviour of indoor-housed farm animals automatically using machine vision technology: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kaitlin Wurtz; Irene Camerlink; Richard B D'Eath; Alberto Peña Fernández; Tomas Norton; Juan Steibel; Janice Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling-perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences.

Authors:  Mark Alber; Adrian Buganza Tepole; William R Cannon; Suvranu De; Salvador Dura-Bernal; Krishna Garikipati; George Karniadakis; William W Lytton; Paris Perdikaris; Linda Petzold; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-11-25
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.

Authors:  Hector M Menendez; Jameson R Brennan; Charlotte Gaillard; Krista Ehlert; Jaelyn Quintana; Suresh Neethirajan; Aline Remus; Marc Jacobs; Izabelle A M A Teixeira; Benjamin L Turner; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.