Literature DB >> 22307478

Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows: a Bayesian approach.

A V Hansen1, A B Strathe, E Kebreab, J France, P K Theil.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a framework describing the milk production curve in sows as affected by parity, method of milk yield (MY) determination, litter size (LS), and litter gain (LG). A database containing data on LS, LG, dietary protein and fat content, MY, and composition measured on more than 1 d during lactation and method for determining MY from peer reviewed publications and individual sow data from 3 studies was constructed. A Bayesian hierarchical model was developed to analyze milk production data. The classical Wood curve was used to model time trends in MY during lactation, and it was re-parameterized expressing the natural logarithm of MY values at d 5, 20, and 30 as functional parameters. The model incorporated random effects of experiment, sow nested within experiment, and fixed effects of LS, LG, parity, and method through the functional parameters of the Wood curve. A second set of models were constructed to analyze milk composition data, including day in milk, LS, dietary protein, and fat contents. Four scenarios with different LG and LS were constructed using the framework to estimate the energy output in milk at different days during lactation. The estimated energy output was compared with energy output values calculated using the 1998 NRC method. Milk yield was underestimated by approximately 20% with the weigh-suckle-weigh technique compared with the deuterium oxide dilution technique (P < 0.001). The mean LG and LS for the dataset were 2.05 kg/d (1.0; 3.3) and 9.5 piglets (5; 14), respectively. The MY was affected by LS on d 5 and 20 (P < 0.001) and by LG on d 20 (P < 0.001) and d 30 (P = 0.004). The mean time to peak lactation was 18.7 d (SD = 1.06) postpartum and mean MY at peak lactation was 9.23 kg (SD = 0.14). The average protein, lactose, and fat content of milk was 5.22 (SD = 0.06), 5.41 (SD = 0.08), and 7.32% (SD = 0.17%), respectively. The NE requirement for lactation increased from d 5 to 20 because of increased MY. Requirements also increased with increasing LG and LS. The framework could be used to predict energy and protein requirements for lactation under different production expectations and can be incorporated into a whole animal model for determination of energy and nutrient requirements for lactating sows, which can optimize sow performance and longevity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22307478     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  24 in total

1.  Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Panagiotis Sakkas; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Dynamic modeling of nutrient use and individual requirements of lactating sows1.

Authors:  Raphaël Gauthier; Christine Largouët; Charlotte Gaillard; Laetitia Cloutier; Frédéric Guay; Jean-Yves Dourmad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of mono-component xylanase supplementation on nutrient digestibility and performance of lactating sows fed a coarsely ground diet.

Authors:  Pan Zhou; Morakot Nuntapaitoon; Trine Friis Pedersen; Thomas Sønderby Bruun; Brian Fisker; Peter Kappel Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Optimal crude protein in diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids fed to high-yielding lactating sows1.

Authors:  Camilla K Hojgaard; Thomas S Bruun; Peter K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The Impact of Enhancing Diet Quality or Dietary Supplementation of Flavor and Multi-Enzymes on Primiparous Lactating Sows.

Authors:  Li Zhe; Rui Zhou; Peter Kappel Theil; Uffe Krogh; Lunxiang Yang; Yong Zhuo; Yan Lin; Shengyu Xu; Xuemei Jiang; Lingjie Huang; Lianqiang Che; Bin Feng; Zhengfeng Fang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Impact of a high-protein diet during lactation on milk composition and offspring in a pig model.

Authors:  Alexandra Schutkowski; Holger Kluge; Paula Trotz; Gerd Hause; Bettina König; Monika Wensch-Dorendorf; Gabriele I Stangl
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  Impact of arginine supplementation on serum prolactin and mRNA abundance of amino acid transporter genes in mammary tissue of lactating sows.

Authors:  Uffe Krogh; Chantal Farmer; Lee-Anne Huber; Peter K Theil; Nathalie L Trottier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Optimal lysine in diets for high-yielding lactating sows1.

Authors:  Camilla K Hojgaard; Thomas S Bruun; Peter K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Intravenous infusion of glucose improved farrowing performance of hyperprolific crossbred sows.

Authors:  Signe E Nielsen; Takele Feyera; Sigrid J W Skovmose; Uffe Krogh; Maria Eskildsen; Peter K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  A dynamic mammary gland model describing colostrum immunoglobulin transfer and milk production in lactating sows.

Authors:  Uffe Krogh; Hélène Quesnel; Nathalie Le Floch; Aude Simongiovanni; Jaap van Milgen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.