| Literature DB >> 31096548 |
Nenad Naumovski1,2, Alexandra Foscolou3, Nathan M D'Cunha4,5, Stefanos Tyrovolas6,7, Christina Chrysohoou8, Labros S Sidossis9,10, Loukianos Rallidis11, Antonia-Leda Matalas12, Evangelos Polychronopoulos13, Christos Pitsavos14, Demosthenes Panagiotakos15,16,17,18.
Abstract
Tea is one of the most-widely consumed beverages in the world with a number of different beneficial health effects, mainly ascribed to the polyphenolic content of the tea catechins. The aim of this study was to examine the consumption of green, black, or no tea, in relation to the previously validated successful ageing index (SAI; higher values "healthier" ageing) in a combined analysis of adults aged >50 years old from the ATTICA (n = 1128 adults from Athens, Greece metropolitan area) and the MEDiterranean Islands Study (MEDIS) (n = 2221 adults from various Greek island and Mani) studies. After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and coffee consumption, green tea was positively associated with SAI (b ± SE: 0.225 ± 0.055, p < 0.001), while black tea was negatively associated with SAI (unstandardized b coefficient ± Standard error: -0.807 ± 0.054, p < 0.001). Green tea (vs black tea) consumption, had higher odds of a SAI of over 3.58 out of 10 (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.38-2.28). Green tea consumption was also associated with higher levels of physical activity (p < 0.001) and reduced likelihood of hypertension (p = 0.006) compared with black tea. Two possible mechanisms are that green tea possesses high levels of catechins such as (-)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate and l-theanine compared with black tea. Therefore, the present analysis supports both the role of green tea constituents in successful ageing, as well as its role as an important component of an overall healthy diet in adults aged 50 years and over from these two epidemiological studies.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; cardiovascular disease; green tea; successful ageing index; tea consumption
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31096548 PMCID: PMC6571865 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of the four main green tea catechins (a) Epicatechin; (b) Epigallocatechin; (c) Epicatechin-3-gallate; (d) Epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Adapted from [6,18].
Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics of the ATTICA and MEDIS study participants based on the type of tea (green/black) they consume.
| MEDIS and ATTICA Study Participants * ( | Green Tea Consumers ( | Black Tea Consumers ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 69 ± 10 | 74 ± 8.3 | 74 ± 7.0 | 0.300 |
| Male n (%) | 1751 (52) | 318 (53) | 281 (47) | 0.026 |
| Female n (%) | 1598 (48) | 277 (47) | 319 (53) | 0.026 |
| Ever smoking n (%) | 1358 (43) | 217 (39) | 198 (34) | 0.111 |
| Physically active n (%) | 1372 (41) | 278 (47) | 219 (37) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28 ± 4.4 | 29 ± 4.7 | 29 ± 4.8 | 0.129 |
| Hypertension n (%yes) | 1881 (86) | 362 (89) | 423 (94) | 0.006 |
| Diabetes n (%yes) | 696 (21) | 146 (25) | 139 (23) | 0.578 |
| Hypercholesterolemia n (%yes) | 1747 (53) | 327 (55) | 317 (53) | 0.458 |
| Coffee n (% yes) | 2791 (85) | 525 (88) | 548 (92) | 0.087 |
|
| ||||
| 0–1 cup | 796 (67) | 390 (66) | 406 (73) | <0.001 |
| 1–2 cups | 238 (20) | 124 (21) | 114 (18) | <0.001 |
| 3–5 cups | 124 (10) | 68 (11) | 56 (8) | <0.001 |
| 5+ cups | 34 (3) | 14 (2) | 20 (1) | 0.001 |
| MedDietScore (0–55) | 29 ± 7.1 | 33 ± 4.6 | 33 ± 4.9 | 0.868 |
| Cardiometabolic risk factors (0–4) | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 1.7 ± 1.0 | 1.9 ± 1.1 | 0.092 |
| SAI (0–10) | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 2.9 ± 1.4 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | <0.001 |
* All MEDIS and ATTICA study participants consuming or not tea, or without information about tea consumption. Values are presented as percent (%) or mean ± standard deviation. p: probability values between green tea and black tea consumers derived from Student’s t-test for continuous variables or the chi-square test for the categorical variables.
Results from five linear regression models that evaluated the association between the type (Green or Black) of tea consumed and successful aging (dependent outcome), after adjusting for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption, among ATTICA and MEDIS study participants.
| b ± SE |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea | 0.503 ± 0.078 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea or Control group | 0.020 ± 0.057 | 0.722 |
| Model 3 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green tea vs. Control group | 0.225 ± 0.055 | <0.001 |
| Model 4 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black vs. Green tea or Control group | −0.727 ± 0.055 | <0.001 |
| Model 5 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black tea vs. Control group | −0.807 ± 0.054 | <0.001 |
Results for the association of tea consumption (yes/no) on SAI (i.e., the higher the better) are presented as unstandardized b coefficients ± Standard Error and p-value. Control group: no tea drinking.
Results from logistic regression models that evaluated the association between the type (Green or Black) of tea consumed with successful aging index (i.e., above or below the median value 3.58) (dependent variable) among ATTICA and MEDIS study participants, separately for males and females.
| OR | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Model 1 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea | 1.77 | 1.38–2.28 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea or Control group | 1.41 | 1.15–1.73 | 0.001 |
| Model 3 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green tea vs. Control group | 1.20 | 1.05–1.51 | 0.048 |
| Model 4 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black vs. Green tea or Control group | 0.62 | 0.51–0.77 | <0.001 |
| Model 5 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black tea vs. Control group | 0.69 | 0.55–0.86 | 0.001 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea | 1.75 | 1.22–2.52 | 0.003 |
| Model 2 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea or Control group | 1.36 | 1.01–1.84 | 0.049 |
| Model 3 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green tea vs. Control group | 1.12 | 0.80–1.56 | 0.527 |
| Model 4 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black vs. Green tea or Control group | 0.62 | 0.46–0.83 | 0.002 |
| Model 5 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black tea vs. Control group | 0.63 | 0.45–0.89 | 0.07 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea | 1.79 | 1.26–2.53 | 0.001 |
| Model 2 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green vs. Black tea or Control group | 1.50 | 1.12–2.01 | 0.007 |
| Model 3 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Green tea vs. Control group | 1.31 | 0.96–1.80 | 0.093 |
| Model 4 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black vs. Green tea or Control group | 0.67 | 0.50–0.89 | 0.006 |
| Model 5 adj. for age, sex, smoking and coffee consumption + Black tea vs. Control group | 0.76 | 0.56–1.04 | 0.087 |
Results of tea consumption (yes/no) on the likelihood of having higher SAI (i.e., better aging) are presented as Odds Ratios (OR), their corresponding 95% CI and p-value.