| Literature DB >> 29495365 |
Wojciech Koch1, Wirginia Kukula-Koch2, Łukasz Komsta3.
Abstract
A comprehensive study on the composition and antioxidant properties of black tea samples with a chemometric approach was performed via LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS, DPPH radical scavenging assay, and Folin-Ciocalteu assay (TPC). Marked differences between the teas from seven different countries (China, India, Iran, Japan, Kenya, Nepal, Sri Lanka) were shown. The Indian samples demonstrated the highest total catechin content (184.8 mg/100 mL), the largest TPC and DPPH scavenging potential (58.2 mg/100 mL and 84.5%, respectively). The applied principal component analysis (PCA) and ANOVA revealed several correlations between the level of catechins in tea infusions. EC (epicatechin), ECG (epicatechin gallate), EGC (epigallocatechin), and EGCG (epigallocatechin-3-gallate) content was not correlated with DPPH, gallic acid, and TPC; however, a strong correlation of EC and ECG between themselves and a negative correlation of these two catechins with EGCG and EGC was noted. Interestingly, simple catechins were not found to be responsible for antioxidant properties of the black teas. The samples collected in the higher altitudes were similar.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS; antioxidant activity; black teas; catechins; principal component analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29495365 PMCID: PMC6017602 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23030513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The content of gallic acid and catechins in the black teas.
| Parameter | GA * | EGC * | EGCG * | ECG * | EC * | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 3.54 | 18.0 | 0.29 | - | - | |
| SD | 0.28 | 1.92 | 0.02 | |||
| Range | 3.37–4.11 | 15.7–20.6 | 0.18–0.45 | |||
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 2.66 | 14.2 | 0.15 | - | 0.04 | |
| SD | 0.43 | 1.77 | 0.04 | 0.01 | ||
| Range | 2.05–3.09 | 12.0–17.3 | 0.12–0.20 | 0.03–0.07 | ||
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 5.34 | 33.0 | 0.12 | - | 0.38 | |
| SD | 0.45 | 2.93 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||
| Range | 4.69–5.94 | 29.9–36.5 | 0.08–0.15 | 0.35–0.41 | ||
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 6.0 | 178.0 | 0.86 | - | - | |
| SD | 0.73 | 19.5 | 0.07 | |||
| Range | 5.28–7.11 | 156.8–205.2 | 0.64–0.96 | |||
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 3.74 | 49.2 | 1.18 | - | - | |
| SD | 0.59 | 5.25 | 0.17 | |||
| Range | 3.29–4.53 | 41.2–58.4 | 0.84–1.32 | |||
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 0.27 | 9.91 | - | 0.08 | 0.28 | |
| SD | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.007 | 0.05 | ||
| Range | 0.21–0.29 | 8.35–11.4 | 0.06–0.09 | 0.19–0.34 | ||
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 3.68 | 25.5 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.51 | |
| SD | 0.35 | 4.18 | 0.009 | 0.04 | 0.08 | |
| Range | 3.18–3.95 | 18.5–32.8 | 0.04–0.06 | 0.33–0.43 | 0.42–0.57 | |
| Mean (mg/100 mL) | 9.42 | 33.9 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.57 | |
| SD | 1.74 | 4.01 | 0.02 | 0.022 | 0.08 | |
| Range | 7.12–11.5 | 28.1–39.4 | 0.04–0.09 | 0.1–0.15 | 0.48–0.68 | |
* GA (gallic acid), EC (epicatechin), ECG (epicatechin gallate), EGC (epigallocatechin), and EGCG (epigallocatechin-3-gallate).
Total phenolic content (TPC) and antiradical activity of selected black teas.
| Tea | TPC * (mg/100 mL) | SD | Antiradical Activity (%) | SD | Trolox Equivalent (µM/L) | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH (China) | 17.5 a | 1.73 | 33.6 | 3.19 | 1.74 | 0.18 |
| JA (Japan) | 28.4 b | 2.62 | 35.6 | 5.28 | 1.85 | 0.16 |
| K (Kenya) | 49.9 c | 5.12 | 75.6 | 8.80 | 2.55 | 0.22 |
| I (India) | 58.2 c | 6.16 | 84.5 | 7.31 | 3.11 | 0.34 |
| S (Sri Lanka) | 33.8 b | 4.28 | 54.8 | 7.70 | 1.97 | 0.21 |
| IR (Iran) | 20.2 a | 3.11 | 31.8 | 4.20 | 1.51 | 0.14 |
| NH (Nepal) | 52.7 c | 4.78 | 82.6 | 9.43 | 3.00 | 0.22 |
| NM (Nepal) | 44.0 c | 5.05 | 73.4 | 8.48 | 2.38 | 0.23 |
* expressed as gallic acid equivalents; different letters by column are statistically significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1The scores of first two principal components of PCA analysis, explaining together 80% of information in the obtained dataset.
Figure 2The loadings of first two components depicted on Figure 2. For explanations, see text.
The geographical origin and number of samples for the investigated black teas.
| Code | Sampling Region | Number (Representatives) |
|---|---|---|
| CH | China | 6 |
| JA | Japan | 6 |
| K | Kenya | 6 |
| IR | Iran | 6 |
| NH | Nepal (border of the Darjeeling region, altitude >2000 m) | 6 |
| NM | Nepal (altitude 1500–1700 m) | 6 |
| I | India (Assam region) | 6 |
| S | Sri Lanka | 6 |
Validation parameters obtained in the optimized LC-MS method (n = 5).
| Compound | LOD (ng/mL) | LOQ (ng/mL) | R2 | Calibration Curve Equation | Linearity Range (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 0.52 | 1.56 | 0.9990 | 0.030–30 | |
| EGCG | 0.46 | 1.38 | 0.9988 | 0.015–35 | |
| EGC | 0.42 | 1.26 | 0.9987 | 0.020–40 | |
| ECG | 0.42 | 1.26 | 0.9992 | 0.015–40 | |
| EC | 0.42 | 1.26 | 0.9994 | 0.010–40 |
Figure 3The EIC chromatograms of all catechins identified in the extracts in the negative mode of LC ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis, identified based on the comparison with reference compounds.