Literature DB >> 31081723

Improving Acceptance of Inpatient Portals: Patients' and Care Team Members' Perspectives.

Ann Scheck McAlearney1,2,3,4, Alice Gaughan2, Sarah R MacEwan2, Naleef Fareed2,3, Timothy R Huerta1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Background: Inpatient portals are gaining interest as a means to increase patient-centered care during hospitalization. However, acceptance of a new technology such as the inpatient portal relies on perceptions of both its usefulness and ease of use. These factors have not been studied in the context of inpatient portal implementation.
Methods: We interviewed patients (n = 123) and care team members (n = 447) about their experiences using an inpatient portal that had been implemented across a large, academic medical center. Interviews lasted 5-15 min, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and then analyzed using a combination of deductive and inductive methods.
Results: Collectively, interviewees reported that the inpatient portal was a useful tool as it improved patients' access to information, enhanced communication, facilitated education, and appeared to promote patients' sense of control while in the hospital. Most interviewees also found the technology easy to use. However, there were concerns that the portal was not easy to use for those less experienced with technology. Interviewees identified the need to emphasize the value of the technology to both patients and care team members and the need to provide additional training to support portal use, as ways to promote acceptance of the tool. Discussion and Conclusions: Inpatient portals can improve patient-centered care, but such improvements require acceptance of the tool by both patients and care team members. Our findings about the usefulness and ease of use of an inpatient portal can inform future efforts to improve the implementation and acceptance of this new technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hospitalization; patient portals; patient-centered care; technology acceptance model

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31081723      PMCID: PMC7476387          DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  18 in total

1.  Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health.

Authors:  E Vance Wilson; Nancy K Lankton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Terese Otte-Trojel; Antoinette de Bont; Thomas G Rundall; Joris van de Klundert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The impact of user's perceived ability on online health information acceptance.

Authors:  Nam Eun Kim; Sang Sook Han; Keun Hee Yoo; Eun Kyoung Yun
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Empowering Patients during Hospitalization: Perspectives on Inpatient Portal Use.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Naleef Fareed; Alice Gaughan; Sarah R MacEwan; Jaclyn Volney; Cynthia J Sieck
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; David Rind; Zachary Tofias; Daniel Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use.

Authors:  David K Ahern; Susan S Woods; Marie C Lightowler; Scott W Finley; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard; Ivan Watkins; Michael S Mackert; Bo Xie; Keri K Stephens; Heidi Shalev
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults.

Authors:  Sue Peacock; Ashok Reddy; Suzanne G Leveille; Jan Walker; Thomas H Payne; Natalia V Oster; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Patient Engagement as Measured by Inpatient Portal Use: Methodology for Log File Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Huerta; Naleef Fareed; Jennifer L Hefner; Cynthia J Sieck; Christine Swoboda; Robert Taylor; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Health Care Consumers: An Acceptance Model and Survey.

Authors:  Jorge Tavares; Tiago Oliveira
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  4 in total

1.  Facilitating Organizational Change to Accommodate an Inpatient Portal.

Authors:  Daniel M Walker; Alice Gaughan; Naleef Fareed; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Revisiting Provider Role in Patient Use of Online Medical Records.

Authors:  Surma Mukhopadhyay; Ramsankar Basak; Saif Khairat; Timothy J Carney
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Designing Inpatient Portals to Support Patient Agency and Dynamic Hospital Experiences.

Authors:  Shefali Haldar; Maher Khelifi; Sonali R Mishra; Calvin Apodaca; Erin Beneteau; Ari H Pollack; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

4.  Patient Portals: Useful for Whom and for What? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Survey Data.

Authors:  Christine M Swoboda; Matthew J DePuccio; Naleef Fareed; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Daniel M Walker
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.762

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.