Christine M Swoboda1, Matthew J DePuccio1, Naleef Fareed1,2, Ann Scheck McAlearney1,3, Daniel M Walker1,3. 1. CATALYST-The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States. 3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients who use patient portals may be more engaged and empowered in their care; however, differences in who accesses patient portals remain. The characteristics of who uses patient portals more frequently and who perceives them as useful may also differ, as well as which functions people use. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the characteristics of patient portal users to examine who uses them more frequently and who perceives them as useful. In addition, we wanted to see if those who use them more frequently or perceive them to be more useful use different functions or more functions of patient portals. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional data from 2017 to 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were used. Ordinal regression models were developed to assess frequency of use and perceived usefulness by demographics, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between the use of 10 patient portal functions and frequency of use and perceived usefulness of patient portals. RESULTS: The odds of using patient portals more frequently were higher among those with Bachelor's degrees, incomes between $35,000 and $75,000, and those with two or more chronic conditions. Respondents with three or more chronic conditions had higher odds of rating patient portals as useful. Those who used their patient portal 10 or more times in the past year had higher odds of using all functions except for viewing test results compared with those who used their patient portal one to two times per year. Those who rated patient portals as "very useful" had higher odds of using seven of the functions compared with those who rated them "not very"/"not at all useful." CONCLUSION: It is important to continue to assess usefulness, frequency of use, and overall patient portal function use to identify opportunities to increase patient engagement with patient portals. Thieme. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Patients who use patient portals may be more engaged and empowered in their care; however, differences in who accesses patient portals remain. The characteristics of who uses patient portals more frequently and who perceives them as useful may also differ, as well as which functions people use. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the characteristics of patient portal users to examine who uses them more frequently and who perceives them as useful. In addition, we wanted to see if those who use them more frequently or perceive them to be more useful use different functions or more functions of patient portals. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional data from 2017 to 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were used. Ordinal regression models were developed to assess frequency of use and perceived usefulness by demographics, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between the use of 10 patient portal functions and frequency of use and perceived usefulness of patient portals. RESULTS: The odds of using patient portals more frequently were higher among those with Bachelor's degrees, incomes between $35,000 and $75,000, and those with two or more chronic conditions. Respondents with three or more chronic conditions had higher odds of rating patient portals as useful. Those who used their patient portal 10 or more times in the past year had higher odds of using all functions except for viewing test results compared with those who used their patient portal one to two times per year. Those who rated patient portals as "very useful" had higher odds of using seven of the functions compared with those who rated them "not very"/"not at all useful." CONCLUSION: It is important to continue to assess usefulness, frequency of use, and overall patient portal function use to identify opportunities to increase patient engagement with patient portals. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Authors: Srinivas Emani; Ellen Peters; Sonali Desai; Andrew S Karson; Stuart R Lipsitz; Rajani LaRocca; John Stone; Vlas Suric; Jonathan S Wald; Amy Wheeler; Deborah H Williams; David W Bates Journal: J Innov Health Inform Date: 2018-10-25
Authors: Mita Sanghavi Goel; Tiffany L Brown; Adam Williams; Romana Hasnain-Wynia; Jason A Thompson; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lorraine S Wallace; Heather Angier; Nathalie Huguet; James A Gaudino; Alex Krist; Marla Dearing; Marie Killerby; Miguel Marino; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Courtney R Lyles; Melissa M Parker; Jill Allen; Robert Nguyen; Howard H Moffet; Dean Schillinger; Andrew J Karter Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Terese Otte-Trojel; Thomas G Rundall; Antoinette de Bont; Joris van de Klundert; Mary E Reed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Stephanie L Shimada; Jeroan J Allison; Amy K Rosen; Hua Feng; Thomas K Houston Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Bas Hoogenbosch; Jeroen Postma; Janneke M de Man-van Ginkel; Nicole Am Tiemessen; Johannes Jm van Delden; Harmieke van Os-Medendorp Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 5.428