Literature DB >> 16221943

Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience.

Saul N Weingart1, David Rind, Zachary Tofias, Daniel Z Sands.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although the patient Internet portal is a potentially transformative technology, there is little scientific information about the demographic and clinical characteristics of portal enrollees and the features that they access.
DESIGN: We describe two pilot studies of a comprehensive Internet portal called PatientSite. These pilots include a prospective one-year cohort study of all patients who enrolled in April 2003 and a case-control study in 2004 of enrollees and nonenrollees at two hospital-based primary care practices. MEASUREMENTS: The cohort study tracked patient enrollment and features in PatientSite that enrollees accessed, such as laboratory and radiology results, prescription renewals, appointment requests, managed care referrals, and clinical messaging. The case-control study used medical record review to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of 100 randomly selected PatientSite enrollees and 100 nonenrollees.
RESULTS: PatientSite use grew steadily after its introduction. New enrollees logged in most frequently in the first month, but 26% to 77% of the cohort continued to access the portal at least monthly. They most often examined laboratory and radiology results and sent clinical messages to their providers. PatientSite enrollees were younger and more affluent and had fewer medical problems than nonenrollees.
CONCLUSION: Expanding the use of patient portals will require an understanding of obstacles that prevent access for those who might benefit most from this technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16221943      PMCID: PMC1380201          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  4 in total

1.  Web messaging: a new tool for patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Eric M Liederman; Catrina S Morefield
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Opportunities to enhance patient and physician e-mail contact.

Authors:  John Hobbs; Jonathan Wald; Yamini S Jagannath; Anne Kittler; Lisa Pizziferri; Lynn A Volk; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care?

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework.

Authors:  Warren J Winkelman; Kevin J Leonard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

  4 in total
  99 in total

1.  Triaging patients at risk of influenza using a patient portal.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Titus L Daniels; Thomas R Talbot; Taylor McClain; Robert Hennes; Shane Stenner; Sue Muse; Jim Jirjis; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Web portals and patient information-seeking behaviors.

Authors:  Robert Miller
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Consumer support for health information exchange and personal health records: a regional health information organization survey.

Authors:  Vaishali N Patel; Rina V Dhopeshwarkar; Alison Edwards; Yolanda Barrón; Jeffrey Sparenborg; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Jennifer Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander Sackeim; Susan Restaino; Syed T Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; David Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Patient Portals: Who uses them? What features do they use? And do they reduce hospital readmissions?

Authors:  Ashley Griffin; Asheley Skinner; Jonathan Thornhill; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 6.  Patient web portals to improve diabetes outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chandra Y Osborn; Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry; Shelagh A Mulvaney; Rachel Hess
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Perceptions of Medicaid beneficiaries regarding the usefulness of accessing personal health information and services through a patient Internet portal.

Authors:  David F Lobach; Janese M Willis; Jennifer M Macri; Jessica Simo; Kevin J Anstrom
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

8.  e-Talking to patients: connecting with the health care consumer.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; Eric Varley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction.

Authors:  James D Ralston; David Carrell; Robert Reid; Melissa Anderson; Maureena Moran; James Hereford
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Use of Electronic Patient Portals in Pregnancy: An Overview.

Authors:  Erinma P Ukoha; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.