Literature DB >> 31067033

Highly Strained III-V-V Coaxial Nanowire Quantum Wells with Strong Carrier Confinement.

Yunyan Zhang1, George Davis2, H Aruni Fonseka3, Anton Velichko2, Anders Gustafsson4, Tillmann Godde2, Dhruv Saxena5, Martin Aagesen6, Patrick W Parkinson7, James A Gott3, Suguo Huo8, Ana M Sanchez3, David J Mowbray2, Huiyun Liu1.   

Abstract

Coaxial quantum wells (QWs) are ideal candidates for nanowire (NW) lasers, providing strong carrier confinement and allowing close matching of the cavity mode and gain medium. We report a detailed structural and optical study and the observation of lasing for a mixed group-V GaAsP NW with GaAs QWs. This system offers a number of potential advantages in comparison to previously studied common group-V structures ( e. g., AlGaAs/GaAs) including highly strained binary GaAs QWs, the absence of a lower band gap core region, and deep carrier potential wells. Despite the large lattice mismatch (∼1.7%), it is possible to grow defect-free GaAs coaxial QWs with high optical quality. The large band gap difference results in strong carrier confinement, and the ability to apply a high degree of compressive strain to the GaAs QWs is also expected to be beneficial for laser performance. For a non-fully optimized structure containing three QWs, we achieve low-temperature lasing with a low external (internal) threshold of 20 (0.9) μJ/cm2/pulse. In addition, a very narrow lasing line width of ∼0.15 nm is observed. These results extend the NW laser structure to coaxial III-V-V QWs, which are highly suitable as the platform for NW emitters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  III−V−V; carrier collection; carrier confinement; laser; nanowire; quantum well

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067033      PMCID: PMC7007272          DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b01775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


Semiconductor nanowires (NW) lasers provide strong optical mode confinement in a very small volume, allowing laser diameters on the order of a few hundred nanometers and length of a few micrometers.[1−3] They hence provide small-size, low-power devices with a wide range of applications. Moreover, III–V NW structures can be grown on a Si platform,[4−6] thus enabling fabrication of high-quality photonic light sources for low-cost, ultra-high-density integration, solving one of the major challenges currently limiting the exploitation of Si photonics.[7−11] While optically pumped NW lasers have been demonstrated,[7,12−15] further reducing the threshold is critical for many applications as well as realizing electrically injected devices.[16,17] Threshold reduction can be achieved by confining carriers within a nanostructure to benefit from the enhanced gain and improved temperature stability;[18,19] both quantum dots (QDs)[15] and coaxial quantum wells (QWs)[20] have been used as the gain medium. The use of coaxial QWs is particularly attractive, as it allows a much larger effective volume of gain material to be incorporated into the NWs, and the position of the QWs can be easily tailored to strongly overlap with the cavity mode. There have been relatively few demonstrations of the use of coaxial QWs to reduce the threshold of NW lasers,[21−23] with all reports using III–III–V, common group-V material systems (e.g., AlGaAs/GaAs),[24−30] which have some disadvantages associated with the challenges of growing III–III–V core NWs. During the NW growth, the vast majority of the group-III atoms diffuse from the substrate and NW sidewalls to the growth front.[31] Different group-III elements have very different diffusion lengths, which are also highly temperature sensitive. Therefore, there are large differences in the optimal growth conditions for each species, especially in the growth temperature.[32,33] This makes the growth of III–III–V NWs difficult, especially for the self-catalyzed growth mode.[32,34] As a result, III–III–V NWs with QWs are commonly built on binary core NWs. For example, AlGaAs/GaAs QWs use a GaAs core NW. Due to the lower band gap of bulk GaAs compared to AlGaAs and the GaAs QW, the core NW forms a lower potential region, which may trap a large number of carriers (Supporting Information Figure 1a). Strong core emission has been observed in this type of QWs, lowering the optical efficiency of the active region.[35] Although GaAs NWs with InGaAs QWs do not have a lower band gap core, and lasing from this system has been reported,[36] it appears to be difficult to obtain deep electrons and wells, even for high In compositions and hence significant strain. In contrast, group-V elements do not have the diffusion-length issue and III–V–V NWs can easily be grown with a large composition range.[37] Therefore, III–V–V NWs with QWs can easily circumvent carrier trapping issues (Supporting Information Figure 1b). However, III–V–V-type NWs containing coaxial QWs have not been studied in any detail, and little is known about their basic structural, electronic, and optical properties. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of lasers based on this type of structure. Strong carrier confinement by deep QWs is expected to be very important given the high surface-to-volume ratio of the NWs and the close proximity of the active material to the surface, which can have a high density of carrier traps.[38] Achieving deep confinement potentials for both electrons and holes requires semiconductor pairs with large band gap differences, but this can result in a high level of strain. The small NW size may allow the accommodation of high strain without the formation of dislocations, but there has been no study to date of highly strained NWs containing QWs and their application to lasers. A systematic and detailed study is thus needed, in particular of the relationship between the QW depth, carrier confinement, and lasing performance. If strained deep QWs can demonstrate their suitability for NW lasers, this will greatly expand material choice, providing more freedom in device design. The ternary III–V–V material, GaAsP, has a band gap that covers wavelengths ranging from green (550 nm) to near-infrared (860 nm) at room temperature.[39] Consequently, it is one of the most promising III–V compound semiconductors for visible emitters. In this paper, we report a detailed structural and optical study of strained GaAsP-based deep coaxial GaAs QWs and demonstrate their suitability for NW lasers.

Results and Discussion

All NW samples were grown directly on p-type Si(111) substrates by solid-source III–V molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). NW growth was initiated via Ga droplets deposited on the Si substrate. Core–shell GaAsP NWs containing a single GaAs coaxial QW were grown for initial structural and optical studies. Scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) images show that the first third of the NW length has a pure zinc-blende (ZB) structure without stacking faults, the middle third is lightly twinned, and the final third, toward the tip, is more defective (Figure a, Supporting Information S2). The diameter is relatively uniform but increases slightly toward the tip, where the presence of stacking faults creates new facets with higher surface energy, allowing faster shell growth.[40] These stacking faults can be fully eliminated by our recently developed modified growth, which produces defect-free NWs.[41] The GaAs0.62P0.38 NW core has a diameter of ∼50 nm (Figure b), and the GaAs QW is 3.5–10 nm thick, confined by ∼18 nm GaAs0.54P0.46 barriers. The QW width asymmetry is due to a shadowing effect during growth, caused by the random positioning of neighboring NWs. This nonuniformity can be seen in the emission spectra of some NWs, where multiple QW emission peaks are observed. This nonuniformity, which is likely to influence lasing performance, can be eliminated using patterned substrates to give uniformly spaced NWs.[4] Both QW interfaces have a transition width of ∼1 nm (Figure c and d), which is much sharper than typical AlGaAs/GaAs NW interfaces.[30,42] Despite a large compressive GaAs QW strain of ∼1.7%, no strain-induced line- or loop-type dislocations are seen in the cross-section and side views (Figure c and f).[43,44] This absence of dislocations is further confirmed by the fast Fourier transform filtered images and strain mapping shown in the Supporting Information, Figures S3 and S4.
Figure 1

Crystalline properties of GaAsP nanowires with a single coaxial GaAs QW. (a) Low-magnification bright field scanning transmission electron microscopy (BF-STEM) image showing one entire NW. The blue, yellow, and green rectangles indicate the twin-free, slightly twinned, and defect-containing regions, respectively. (b) Annular dark field STEM (ADF-STEM) image showing a cross-section from the stacking-fault-free end of the NW. The white region is the GaAs QW. The inset is a schematic of the structure. (c) Atomic-resolution ADF-STEM image of the QW region. (d) Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) line profile of the As concentration across the QW. The sharpness of the two interfaces is more easily seen from the first derivative of the As concentration, the orange data with the black line being a fit. (e) Low-resolution STEM image from the stacking-fault-free section of the NW, imaged along the ⟨112⟩ zone axis. The two pale lines represent the GaAs QW. (f) Atomic-resolution STEM image of the region delimited by the red box in (e).

Crystalline properties of GaAsP nanowires with a single coaxial GaAs QW. (a) Low-magnification bright field scanning transmission electron microscopy (BF-STEM) image showing one entire NW. The blue, yellow, and green rectangles indicate the twin-free, slightly twinned, and defect-containing regions, respectively. (b) Annular dark field STEM (ADF-STEM) image showing a cross-section from the stacking-fault-free end of the NW. The white region is the GaAs QW. The inset is a schematic of the structure. (c) Atomic-resolution ADF-STEM image of the QW region. (d) Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) line profile of the As concentration across the QW. The sharpness of the two interfaces is more easily seen from the first derivative of the As concentration, the orange data with the black line being a fit. (e) Low-resolution STEM image from the stacking-fault-free section of the NW, imaged along the ⟨112⟩ zone axis. The two pale lines represent the GaAs QW. (f) Atomic-resolution STEM image of the region delimited by the red box in (e). These studies demonstrate that it is possible to grow highly strained coaxial QWs with excellent crystalline quality. The ability to apply high levels of compressive strain to the GaAs QW should be advantageous for lasing action due to the increased heavy-hole–light-hole separation and the modification of the in-plane hole mass, which allows a given gain to be produced by a lower carrier density.[45] Reduced threshold currents for compressively strained planar QW lasers have been demonstrated for a number of material systems, but require the use of an alloy QW to achieve the desired strain.[46] The current NW system allows the application of large compressive strains to potentially higher quality binary GaAs QWs; this is not possible for planar growth on a GaAs substrate. The initial ∼2/3 of the NW has a uniform composition (Figure a), and this is reflected in the excellent spatial QW homogeneity (emission intensity, line width, and central wavelength), as demonstrated by the highly uniform cathodoluminescence (CL) emission (Figure b, c, and d). Within the first half of the NW the QW emission is constant to within 3 nm (≡ 7 meV), followed by a small initial blue shift of the CL emission beyond the midpoint of the NW, suggesting a slight reduction of the QW width. No dark spots are visible in the CL image (Figure d), consistent with the absence of dislocations in the shell and QW. Comparison of CL and PL emission wavelengths with NextNano simulations[47] suggests a QW width of ∼6.5–9 nm (Supporting Information S4), with the blue shift with respect to bulk GaAs arising from a combination of quantum confinement and the 1.7% compressive strain of the GaAs well. The energy separation between the lowest QW states and the barriers is calculated to be ∼115 and ∼300 meV for electrons and holes, respectively. The tip of the NW has a lower phosphorus composition (Figure a) and emits at a longer wavelength of >750 nm, consistent with the previous observation (Figure a) that the defective tip region has a faster growth rate and hence a larger GaAs QW width. In addition, the emission at the tip is much weaker, with the broad emission extending below the bulk GaAs band gap, in accordance with the presence of defects.[48]
Figure 2

Structural and optical properties of the single QW NW. (a) EDX line profiles of Ga, As, and P compositions along the length of the NW, as shown in the inset. (b) Normalized cathodoluminescence (CL) spectra recorded at 8 K along the NW length with constant spatial increments. (c) Scanning electron microscope image and (d) CL intensity mapping of the QW emission at 744 nm.

Structural and optical properties of the single QW NW. (a) EDX line profiles of Ga, As, and P compositions along the length of the NW, as shown in the inset. (b) Normalized cathodoluminescence (CL) spectra recorded at 8 K along the NW length with constant spatial increments. (c) Scanning electron microscope image and (d) CL intensity mapping of the QW emission at 744 nm. Micro-photoluminescence (μ-PL) spectra are excited by a 515 nm diode laser which is absorbed by the QW and also both the core and barrier GaAsP. The NWs are mechanically transferred to a new Si wafer and are studied normal to their length. The 300 K spectra of a single NW (Figure a) are dominated by the QW emission, with the barrier emission only weakly visible. No NW core emission is observed, despite this region forming a potential carrier reservoir due to a lower P composition and constituting ∼20% of the total NW volume (Figure b and c). This indicates very efficient carrier transfer from the GaAsP regions to the QW. At 6 K the photoexcited carriers are much less mobile,[49] and a very broad but weak emission is observed in the range 590–680 nm (Figure b) due to the QW barriers and NW core. The QW emission has a narrow full width at half maximum (fwhm) of 6.9 nm (≡ 16 meV) and is ∼103 more intense than that of the GaAsP. The ratio of the integrated QW emission (691–808 nm) to that of the barrier and core emission (591–680 nm) exceeds 200 over the temperature range 6–300 K for low excitation power (Figure c); this ratio increases rapidly with excitation power (Figure d). The lifetime of the QW-confined carriers increases with increasing wavelength (decreasing energy) (Figure e, Supporting Information S5), reflecting state filling and the transfer of carriers from high to low energy states within the QW. The carrier lifetime at the emission peak is ∼1 ns. An analysis of the temperature dependence of the QW PL intensity, measured from an ensemble of NWs (Figure f), indicates a large barrier of 125 ± 12 meV against carrier loss (Supporting Information S6), which is consistent with the calculated electron localization energy of 115 meV discussed above. It is also found that carrier loss due to surface nonradiative recombination is greatly reduced in the present structure (Supporting Information S6).
Figure 3

Carrier collection and confinement properties of the GaAs–GaAsP NW QW. (a) 300 K and (b) 6 K micro-photoluminescence (μ-PL) spectra from a stacking-fault-free segment of a single NW. The discontinuity in (a) at ∼720 nm results from the stitching together of two spectra. (c) Temperature-dependent and (d) power-dependent ratio of the integrated QW emission (691–808 nm) to the barrier and core emission (591–680 nm). (e) PL spectrum (blue) and carrier lifetimes (red) measured from a stacking-fault-free segment of the NW. (f) Integrated and normalized ensemble PL intensity as a function of inverse temperature.

Carrier collection and confinement properties of the GaAsGaAsP NW QW. (a) 300 K and (b) 6 K micro-photoluminescence (μ-PL) spectra from a stacking-fault-free segment of a single NW. The discontinuity in (a) at ∼720 nm results from the stitching together of two spectra. (c) Temperature-dependent and (d) power-dependent ratio of the integrated QW emission (691–808 nm) to the barrier and core emission (591–680 nm). (e) PL spectrum (blue) and carrier lifetimes (red) measured from a stacking-fault-free segment of the NW. (f) Integrated and normalized ensemble PL intensity as a function of inverse temperature. Our results demonstrate that the deep coaxial QWs act to efficiently capture photoexcited carriers, because the NW diameter (<200 nm) is much smaller than the carrier diffusion length (in the micrometer range).[50,51] Captured carriers are strongly confined by the deep QWs, resulting in extremely weak barrier emission at all temperatures. In addition, the strong confinement inhibits carrier loss to surface states (Supporting Information S6). As a result, the QW NW has a much stronger PL emission (∼150×) compared to NWs with comparable morphology and density but without a QW (Supporting Information S7 and Figure S8). NWs with three coaxial QWs were grown in order to provide the gain required for lasing. The average composition of the NW core is GaAs0.38P0.62, and the barriers are GaAs0.53P0.47 (Figure a). The diameter of the NWs is ∼400 nm. Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations shown in Figure b show incomplete overlap between the QWs and cavity mode. A pulsed laser, with a focused elliptical spot of 30 × 1.4 μm2, was used to excite the NW at 6 K. The excitation wavelength of 635 nm is only absorbed by the QW and not the NW core or barriers. With increasing pulse energy, the broad spontaneous emission shifts toward higher energy due to QW state filling (Figure c). Fabry–Pérot cavity modes at almost constant wavelengths are observed, superimposed on the spontaneous emission. At high pump energies, a small number of modes increase superlinearly with energy, consistent with the onset of lasing (Figure d) at a threshold of ∼20 μJ/cm2/pulse. FDTD simulations indicate that only 4.4% of the incident laser power is absorbed by the NW, which further reduces the absorbed threshold flux to ∼0.9 μJ/cm2/pulse.
Figure 4

Structural and lasing characteristics of a single NW with three coaxial QWs at 6 K. (a) EDX mapping of the phosphorus content across the NW clearly showing the three QWs. (b) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity distribution in the cross-section of the nanowire when illuminated with a Gaussian beam (λ = 635 nm). (c) Pulsed-excited emission spectra for a sample temperature of 6 K. The inset shows a lasing mode for excitation of 49 μJ/cm2/pulse. (d) Double-logarithmic integrated output-power intensity of the lasing mode versus incident pump pulse energy density.

Structural and lasing characteristics of a single NW with three coaxial QWs at 6 K. (a) EDX mapping of the phosphorus content across the NW clearly showing the three QWs. (b) FDTD-simulated electric field intensity distribution in the cross-section of the nanowire when illuminated with a Gaussian beam (λ = 635 nm). (c) Pulsed-excited emission spectra for a sample temperature of 6 K. The inset shows a lasing mode for excitation of 49 μJ/cm2/pulse. (d) Double-logarithmic integrated output-power intensity of the lasing mode versus incident pump pulse energy density. The inset to Figure c shows the dominant laser mode, which has a low line width of ∼0.15 nm (≡ 0.34 meV). This is narrower than the majority of previously reported values for III–V NW lasers (typically >0.7 nm)[7,14,15,20,52−57] and comparable to the lowest reported (resolution limited) value of ∼0.25 meV.[58] This suggests relatively low levels of chirp in the current laser. Three approaches should further improve the performance of the current coaxial QW lasers. The first is eliminating the defects, which form at the tip of the NW and which may consume carriers by nonradiative recombination, particularly at high temperatures. This should improve the temperature performance, which, for the current structure, limits lasing to below ∼100 K under our measurement conditions. Second, due to unoptimized droplet consumption, the top facet has a low quality (Figure a and inset of Figure a). Improving this will provide a higher quality optical cavity. Third, improving the QW width homogeneity by growing the NWs on prepatterned substrates will narrow the spectral distribution of the gain, allowing the threshold gain to be reached for lower carrier injection.

Conclusions

In summary, the properties of deep and highly strained GaAsP/GaAs coaxial NW QWs have been studied. The QW is highly uniform along the NW length for the region where the NW is defect free. Despite the large compressive strain, no strain-induced dislocations are observed in the QW region. The QW exhibits very efficient carrier collection and strong carrier confinement, resulting in the PL being dominated by the QW emission at all temperatures. In addition, carrier localization in the QW appears to reduce the influence of surface states, further contributing to the high radiative efficiency. A NW laser structure containing three coaxial QWs demonstrates a very low external (internal) threshold of 20 (0.9) μJ/cm2/pulse and a very small lasing line width of ∼0.15 nm. The current system offers a number of significant advantages compared to previously studied systems, including deep electron and hole wells, a high compressively strained binary QW, and the absence of a low band gap core, which can act as a carrier sink. These initial results demonstrate that highly strained III–V–V coaxial QWs are suitable for the fabrication of low-threshold NW lasers, with a number of advantages compared to more commonly studied systems.

Experimental Methods

NW Growth

The self-catalyzed GaAsP NWs were grown directly on p-type Si(111) substrates by solid-source III–V MBE.[59] For the single QW NWs, the core GaAs0.62P0.38 NW was grown with a Ga beam equivalent pressure, V/III flux ratio, P/(As + P) flux ratio, substrate temperature, and growth duration of 8.41 × 10–8 Torr, ∼40, 25%, ∼640 °C, and 1.5 h, respectively. After the growth of the core, the Ga droplets were consumed by closing the Ga flux and keeping the As and P fluxes open. Two GaAs0.54P0.46 shells were then grown with a Ga beam equivalent pressure, V/III flux ratio, P/(As + P) flux ratio, substrate temperature, and growth duration of 8.41 × 10–8 Torr, 50, 50%, ∼550 °C, and 30 min, respectively. A ∼10 nm GaAs QW was grown between the two GaAsP shells, with a Ga beam equivalent pressure, V/III flux ratio, substrate temperature, and growth duration of 8.41 × 10–8 Torr, 60, ∼550 °C, and 10 min, respectively. For the three-QW sample, the core GaAs0.38P0.62 NW was grown with a Ga beam equivalent pressure, V/III flux ratio, P/(As + P) flux ratio, substrate temperature, and growth duration of 8.41 × 10–8 Torr, ∼30, 41%, ∼640 °C, and 1.5 h, respectively. After the droplet consumption, the three GaAs QWs and three GaAs0.53P0.47 barriers were grown with same condition as that of the single QW sample, except that the growth time was 1 h for each barrier. Finally, shells of Al0.5Ga0.5As0.53P0.47 (30 min) and GaAs0.53P0.47 (20 min) were deposited. The final NWs have a diameter of ∼400 nm and an as-grown length of 9.4 μm. During growth, the substrate temperature was measured by a pyrometer.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Simple mechanical transfer of the NWs onto a lacey carbon support was used to prepare TEM specimens. The cross-section samples were prepared by embedding the NWs in a low-viscosity resin and slicing using a microtome. The TEM measurements were performed with JEOL 2100 and doubly corrected ARM200F microscopes, both operating at 200 kV.

Cathodoluminescence

Imaging was performed on both NWs still attached to the substrates and also broken off and transferred to a Si substrate. The studies were carried out in a dedicated SEM at a temperature of 8 K, using an acceleration voltage of 5 kV and a probe current of 25 pA. The detector was a Si-CCD. CL measurements shown in Figure c were performed using a Gatan MonoCL3 system within a Zeiss Supra 55VP SEM operating at 3 kV.

Photoluminescence

Large-area PL measurements (Figure b) probe a high number of NWs and is relatively insensitive to movement of the laser spot, which tends to occur as the temperature is varied. Excitation is by a 532 nm diode-pumped solid-state laser, with a 0.25 m monochromator used to disperse the PL, which is detected by a TE-cooled Si detector. μ-PL spectra were obtained from single NWs, which had been removed from the original substrate and transferred to a new Si wafer. μ-PL spectra of single NWs were excited by a cw 515 nm diode laser. The time-resolved PL of the single QW sample and the pumping of the MQW laser sample was performed using a pulsed 635 nm diode laser with a repetition frequency of 80 MHz and 80 ps pulse width. The samples were measured under vacuum inside a continuous flow cryostat (base temperature 6 K). The incident laser was focused with a 20× long working distance microscope objective to a spot size of ∼1 μm diameter. The resultant PL was collected by the same microscope objective and focused into a 0.75 m spectrometer, where the spectral components were resolved and detected using a 300 l/mm grating and a nitrogen-cooled CCD. The spectral resolution was ∼0.5 meV, and higher resolution measurements were recorded using an 1800 lines/mm grating with a resolution of 0.09 meV. The time-resolved PL was detected by a silicon APD and a photon counting card. The resolution of this system was ∼100 ps.

FDTD Simulations

FDTD simulations were performed using Lumerical FDTD Solutions, with a custom source (free-space wavelength of 635 nm, elliptical Gaussian beam with an fwhm of 1.3 and 30 μm along orthogonal directions). The source was injected perpendicular to the nanowire and substrate (200 nm SiO2 covered Si). The nanowire structure was modeled from the cross-sectional TEM image, with a complex refractive index value for the GaAs QW (3.85 + 0.192i) and no absorption for the GaAsP1– barriers (3.6 + 0i). A fine mesh (2 nm resolution) was used to resolve the multiple QW heterostructure. Field monitors were used to record the field in the nanowire cross-section, and the fraction of pump power absorbed was calculated from the net power transmission through a box of monitors surrounding the nanowire.
  37 in total

1.  Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species.

Authors:  Y Cui; Q Wei; H Park; C M Lieber
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Influence of nanowire density on the shape and optical properties of ternary InGaAs nanowires.

Authors:  Yong Kim; Hannah J Joyce; Qiang Gao; H Hoe Tan; Chennupati Jagadish; Mohanchand Paladugu; Jin Zou; Alexandra A Suvorova
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  In(Ga)As quantum dot formation on group-III assisted catalyst-free InGaAs nanowires.

Authors:  Martin Heiss; Bernt Ketterer; Emanuele Uccelli; Joan Ramon Morante; Jordi Arbiol; Anna Fontcuberta i Morral
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  Fabrication and optical properties of GaAs/InGaAs/GaAs nanowire core-multishell quantum well heterostructures.

Authors:  Xin Yan; Xia Zhang; Junshuai Li; Yao Wu; Jiangong Cui; Xiaomin Ren
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  Ultralow-threshold electrically injected AlGaN nanowire ultraviolet lasers on Si operating at low temperature.

Authors:  K H Li; X Liu; Q Wang; S Zhao; Z Mi
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  Large-Scale Statistics for Threshold Optimization of Optically Pumped Nanowire Lasers.

Authors:  Juan Arturo Alanis; Dhruv Saxena; Sudha Mokkapati; Nian Jiang; Kun Peng; Xiaoyan Tang; Lan Fu; Hark Hoe Tan; Chennupati Jagadish; Patrick Parkinson
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.189

7.  Optical, structural, and numerical investigations of GaAs/AlGaAs core-multishell nanowire quantum well tubes.

Authors:  Melodie Fickenscher; Teng Shi; Howard E Jackson; Leigh M Smith; Jan M Yarrison-Rice; Changlin Zheng; Peter Miller; Joanne Etheridge; Bryan M Wong; Qiang Gao; Shriniwas Deshpande; Hark Hoe Tan; Chennupati Jagadish
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Stable Defects in Semiconductor Nanowires.

Authors:  A M Sanchez; J A Gott; H A Fonseka; Y Zhang; H Liu; R Beanland
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Vertically Emitting Indium Phosphide Nanowire Lasers.

Authors:  Wei-Zong Xu; Fang-Fang Ren; Dimitars Jevtics; Antonio Hurtado; Li Li; Qian Gao; Jiandong Ye; Fan Wang; Benoit Guilhabert; Lan Fu; Hai Lu; Rong Zhang; Hark Hoe Tan; Martin D Dawson; Chennupati Jagadish
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Site-Controlled Growth of Monolithic InGaAs/InP Quantum Well Nanopillar Lasers on Silicon.

Authors:  Fabian Schuster; Jonas Kapraun; Gilliard N Malheiros-Silveira; Saniya Deshpande; Connie J Chang-Hasnain
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 11.189

View more
  5 in total

1.  Self-Formed Quantum Wires and Dots in GaAsP-GaAsP Core-Shell Nanowires.

Authors:  H Aruni Fonseka; Anton V Velichko; Yunyan Zhang; James A Gott; George D Davis; Richard Beanland; Huiyun Liu; David J Mowbray; Ana M Sanchez
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Bi incorporation and segregation in the MBE-grown GaAs-(Ga,Al)As-Ga(As,Bi) core-shell nanowires.

Authors:  Janusz Sadowski; Anna Kaleta; Serhii Kryvyi; Dorota Janaszko; Bogusława Kurowska; Marta Bilska; Tomasz Wojciechowski; Jarosław Z Domagala; Ana M Sanchez; Sławomir Kret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Threshold reduction and yield improvement of semiconductor nanowire lasers via processing-related end-facet optimization.

Authors:  Juan Arturo Alanis; Qian Chen; Mykhaylo Lysevych; Tim Burgess; Li Li; Zhu Liu; Hark Hoe Tan; Chennupati Jagadish; Patrick Parkinson
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2019-10-02

4.  Defect-Free Axially Stacked GaAs/GaAsP Nanowire Quantum Dots with Strong Carrier Confinement.

Authors:  Yunyan Zhang; Anton V Velichko; H Aruni Fonseka; Patrick Parkinson; James A Gott; George Davis; Martin Aagesen; Ana M Sanchez; David Mowbray; Huiyun Liu
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Heterostructure and Q-factor engineering for low-threshold and persistent nanowire lasing.

Authors:  Stefan Skalsky; Yunyan Zhang; Juan Arturo Alanis; H Aruni Fonseka; Ana M Sanchez; Huiyun Liu; Patrick Parkinson
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 17.782

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.