Literature DB >> 31062114

Computer-Aided Detection of Incidental Lumbar Spine Fractures from Routine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Studies Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classifier.

Samir D Mehta1, Ronnie Sebro2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

To assess whether application of a support vector machine learning algorithm to ancillary data obtained from posterior-anterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) studies could identify patients with lumbar spine (L1-L4) vertebral body fractures without additional DEXA imaging or radiation. Three hundred seven patients (199 without any fractures of the spine, and 108 patients with at least one fracture of the L1, L2, L3, or L4 vertebral bodies) who had DEXA studies were evaluated. Ancillary data from DEXA output was analyzed. The dataset was split into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. Support vector machines (SVMs) with 10-fold cross-validation and different kernels were used to identify the best kernel based on the greatest area under the curve (AUC) and the best training vectors in the training dataset. The SVM with the best kernel was then applied to the test dataset to assess the accuracy of the SVM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the SVMs using different kernels in the test dataset were compared using DeLong's test. The SVM classifier with the linear kernel had the greatest AUC in the training dataset (AUC = 0.9258). The AUC of the SVM classifier with the linear kernel in the test dataset was 0.8963. The SVM classifier with the linear kernel had an overall average accuracy of 91.8% in the test dataset. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive of the SVM classifier with the linear kernel to detect lumbar spine fractures were 81.8%, 97.4%, 94.7%, and 90.5%, respectively. The SVM classifier with the linear kernel ROC curve had a significantly better AUC than the SVM classifier with the cubic polynomial kernel (P = 0.034) for discriminating between patients with lumbar spine fractures and control patients, but not significantly different from the SVM classifier with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel (P = 0.317) or the SVM classifier with a sigmoid kernel (P = 0.729). All fractures identified by the SVM classifiers were not prospectively identified by the radiologist. SVM analysis of ancillary data obtained from routine DEXA studies can identify lumbar spine fractures without the use of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) DEXA imaging or radiation, and identify fractures missed by radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEXA; Lumbar spine fracture; Osteoporosis; Support vector machine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31062114      PMCID: PMC7064727          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00224-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  32 in total

1.  Incidental findings with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: spectrum of possible diagnoses.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Fabio Ferrari; Danila Diano; Ugo Albisinni; Giuseppe Battista; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Decision Supporting Model for One-year Conversion Probability from MCI to AD using CNN and SVM.

Authors:  Ting Shen; Jiehui Jiang; Yupeng Li; Ping Wu; Chuantao Zuo; Zhuangzhi Yan
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2018-07

3.  Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.

Authors:  P Tothill; J A Fenner; D M Reid
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

5.  Trends in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United States, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Cynthia D O'Malley; Stephen S Johnston; Gregory Lenhart; Gregory Cherkowski; Liisa Palmer; Sarah L Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Hip fracture causes excess mortality owing to cardiovascular and infectious disease in institutionalized older people: a prospective 5-year study.

Authors:  Ian D Cameron; Jian Sheng Chen; Lyn M March; Judy M Simpson; Robert G Cumming; Markus J Seibel; Philip N Sambrook
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A Laster; D J Becker; L Carbone; L C Gary; M L Kilgore; R S Matthews; M A Morrisey; K G Saag; S B Tanner; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Sarah L Morgan; Christopher R Shuhart; Bruno Muzzi Camargos; John J Carey; Catherine M Gordon; Lawrence G Jankowski; Joon-Kiong Lee; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders.

Authors:  Scott Schnell; Susan M Friedman; Daniel A Mendelson; Karilee W Bingham; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

Review 10.  Divergent effects of obesity on fragility fractures.

Authors:  Carla Caffarelli; Chiara Alessi; Ranuccio Nuti; Stefano Gonnelli
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.458

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Yi Yang; Yi-Wei Shen; Ke-Rui Zhang; Ze-Kun Jiang; Li-Tai Ma; Chen Ding; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia from CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis using machine learning.

Authors:  Ronnie Sebro; Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Development and Internal Validation of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting the Risk of Recollapse Following Minimally Invasive Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Sheng-Tao Dong; Jieyang Zhu; Hua Yang; Guangyi Huang; Chenning Zhao; Bo Yuan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Y L Kuo; Conrad Harrison; Terry-Ann Curran; Benjamin Jones; Alexander Freethy; David Cussons; Max Stewart; Gary S Collins; Dominic Furniss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in spine care: current applications and future utility.

Authors:  Alexander L Hornung; Christopher M Hornung; G Michael Mallow; J Nicolás Barajas; Augustus Rush; Arash J Sayari; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 6.  A Surgeon's Guide to Understanding Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Rohan M Shah; Clarissa Wong; Nicholas C Arpey; Alpesh A Patel; Srikanth N Divi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence and spine imaging: limitations, regulatory issues and future direction.

Authors:  Alexander L Hornung; Christopher M Hornung; G Michael Mallow; J Nicolas Barajas; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  Support vector machines are superior to principal components analysis for selecting the optimal bones' CT attenuations for opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using CT scans of the foot or ankle.

Authors:  Ronnie Sebro; Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2022-09-24

9.  Predictors of adverse events after percutaneous pedicle screws fixation in patients with single-segment thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  Shengtao Dong; Zongyuan Li; Yuanyuan Zheng; Zhi-Ri Tang; Hua Yang; Qiuming Zeng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Machine Learning for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis from CT Scans of the Wrist and Forearm.

Authors:  Ronnie Sebro; Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.