Literature DB >> 21787516

Trends in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United States, 2000-2009.

Cynthia D O'Malley1, Stephen S Johnston, Gregory Lenhart, Gregory Cherkowski, Liisa Palmer, Sarah L Morgan.   

Abstract

After a decade of policies encouraging dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) use, Medicare incrementally decreased reimbursement for non-facility-based DXAs, effective 2007. This study quantifies trends in central DXA use before and after the reimbursement change. Using 2000-2009 claims data, we selected subjects aged 50+yr with Medicare supplemental or commercial insurance. The central site DXA test (using CPT codes) rate was calculated within each calendar quarter as the number of patients with a DXA test divided by the total number of patients. Piecewise linear regression was used to quantify change in DXA rates coincident with the 2007 reimbursement reductions. During 2000-2009, slightly over 5 million DXA tests were conducted. Annual rates for females with Medicare steadily increased until 2007, when they leveled off; a similar pattern was observed for the commercially insured. Regression modeling showed that pre-2007 rates increased annually by 0.76% (0.72-0.80) and 0.76% (0.70-0.82) among those with Medicare supplemental and commercial insurance, respectively, and over 2007-2009, rates changed annually by +0.07% (-0.05% to 0.19%) and -0.12% (-0.29% to 0.04%), respectively. During 2007-2009, there were 3.1 (2.4-3.8) and 4.0 (3.1-4.9) fewer tests per 100 person years for females with Medicare supplemental and commercial insurance, respectively, than would have been expected based on the pre-2007 trend. The post-2007 DXA rate was lower than what would have been expected had the observed trend of increasing annual DXA rates from 2000 to 2007 continued unabated beyond the Medicare reimbursement change in 2007. Continuing to provide access to DXA testing for women at increased risk of osteoporosis is important to providing high-quality care for metabolic bone disease in the United States.
Copyright © 2011 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21787516     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  15 in total

1.  Has Choosing Wisely® affected rates of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry use?

Authors:  E C Lasser; E R Pfoh; H Y Chang; K S Chan; J C Bailey; H Kharrazi; J P Weiner; S M Dy
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA.

Authors:  S L Solimeo; V-T T Nguyen; S W Edmonds; Y Lou; D W Roblin; K G Saag; P Cram; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Opportunistic CT screening predicts individuals at risk of major osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  A S Michalski; B A Besler; L A Burt; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Trends in osteoporosis and low bone mass in older US adults, 2005-2006 through 2013-2014.

Authors:  A C Looker; N Sarafrazi Isfahani; B Fan; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry spine scans to determine abdominal fat in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J W Bea; R M Blew; S B Going; C-H Hsu; M C Lee; V R Lee; B J Caan; M L Kwan; T G Lohman
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.937

6.  DXA Utilization Between 2006 and 2012 in Commercially Insured Younger Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Robert A Overman; Joel F Farley; Jeffrey R Curtis; Jie Zhang; Margaret L Gourlay; Chad L Deal
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in rural women with limited access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  K Ito; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effect of Medicare reimbursement reduction for imaging services on osteoporosis screening rates.

Authors:  Carrie McAdam-Marx; Sudhir Unni; Xiangyang Ye; Scott Nelson; Nancy A Nickman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Overuse of short-interval bone densitometry: assessing rates of low-value care.

Authors:  N E Morden; W L Schpero; R Zaha; T D Sequist; C H Colla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Use of iDXA spine scans to evaluate total and visceral abdominal fat.

Authors:  J W Bea; C-H Hsu; R M Blew; A P Irving; B J Caan; M L Kwan; I Abraham; S B Going
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.