Literature DB >> 36268496

Support vector machines are superior to principal components analysis for selecting the optimal bones' CT attenuations for opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using CT scans of the foot or ankle.

Ronnie Sebro1,2, Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos1.   

Abstract

Objectives: To use the computed tomography (CT) attenuation of the foot and ankle bones for opportunistic screening for osteoporosis.
Methods: Retrospective study of 163 consecutive patients from a tertiary care academic center who underwent CT scans of the foot or ankle and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 1 year of each other. Volumetric segmentation of each bone of the foot and ankle was done in 3D Slicer to obtain the mean CT attenuation. Pearson's correlations were used to correlate the CT attenuations with each other and with DXA measurements. Support vector machines (SVM) with various kernels and principal components analysis (PCA) were used to predict osteoporosis and osteopenia/osteoporosis in training/validation and test datasets.
Results: CT attenuation measurements at the talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid, and cuneiforms were correlated with each other and positively correlated with BMD T-scores at the L1-4 lumbar spine, hip, and femoral neck; however, there was no significant correlation with the L1-4 trabecular bone scores. A CT attenuation threshold of 143.2 Hounsfield units (HU) of the calcaneus was best for detection of osteoporosis in the training/validation dataset. SVMs with radial basis function (RBF) kernels were significantly better than the PCA model and the calcaneus for predicting osteoporosis in the test dataset. Conclusions: Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis is possible using the CT attenuation of the foot and ankle bones. SVMs with RBF using all bones is more accurate than the CT attenuation of the calcaneus.
© 2022 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcaneus; Cuboid; Cuneiform; Navicular; Talus

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268496      PMCID: PMC9577430          DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2022.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia        ISSN: 2405-5255


  30 in total

1.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia by routine computed tomography scan: A heterogeneous, multiethnic, middle-eastern population validation study.

Authors:  Adiel Cohen; A Joseph Foldes; Nurith Hiller; Natalia Simanovsky; Auryan Szalat
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention.

Authors:  H Johansson; J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Dual-energy CT: a promising new technique for assessment of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Savvakis Nicolaou; Teresa Liang; Darra T Murphy; Jeff R Korzan; Hugue Ouellette; Peter Munk
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Screening to Prevent Osteoporotic Fractures: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Meera Viswanathan; Shivani Reddy; Nancy Berkman; Katie Cullen; Jennifer Cook Middleton; Wanda K Nicholson; Leila C Kahwati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  An overview and management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tümay Sözen; Lale Özışık; Nursel Çalık Başaran
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-12-30

6.  Computer-Aided Detection of Incidental Lumbar Spine Fractures from Routine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Studies Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classifier.

Authors:  Samir D Mehta; Ronnie Sebro
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Machine learning for the prediction of osteopenia/osteoporosis using the CT attenuation of multiple osseous sites from chest CT.

Authors:  Ronnie Sebro; Cynthia De la Garza-Ramos
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.531

8.  Bone loss and bone size after menopause.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Olof Johnell; Charles H Turner; Gunnar Rannevik; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Outcome of distal radius fractures in relation to bone mineral density.

Authors:  Nadine Hollevoet; René Verdonk
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.500

Review 10.  DXA parameters, Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD), in fracture risk prediction in endocrine-mediated secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Enisa Shevroja; Francesco Pio Cafarelli; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Didier Hans
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.