Literature DB >> 31056389

Yeast Spontaneous Mutation Rate and Spectrum Vary with Environment.

Haoxuan Liu1, Jianzhi Zhang2.   

Abstract

Mutation is the ultimate genetic source of evolution and biodiversity, but to what extent the environment impacts mutation rate and spectrum is poorly understood. Past studies discovered mutagenesis induced by antibiotic treatment or starvation, but its relevance and importance to long-term evolution is unclear because these severe stressors typically halt cell growth and/or cause substantial cell deaths. Here, we quantify the mutation rate and spectrum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by whole-genome sequencing following mutation accumulation in each of seven environments with relatively rapid cell growths and minimal cell deaths. We find the point mutation rate per generation to differ by 3.6-fold among the seven environments, generally increasing in environments with slower cell growths. This trend renders the mutation rate per year more constant than that per generation across environments, which has implications for neutral evolution and the molecular clock. Additionally, we find substantial among-environment variations in mutation spectrum, such as the transition to transversion ratio and AT mutational bias. Other main mutation types, including small insertion or deletion, segmental duplication or deletion, and chromosome gain or loss also tend to occur more frequently in environments where yeast grows more slowly. In contrast to these findings from the nuclear genome, the yeast mitochondrial mutation rate rises with the growth rate, consistent with the metabolic rate hypothesis. Together, these observations indicate that environmental changes, which are ubiquitous in nature, influence not only natural selection, but also the amount and type of mutations available to selection, and suggest that ignoring the latter impact, as is currently practiced, may mislead evolutionary inferences.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Saccharomyces cerevisiae; fitness; genome sequencing; mitochondrial; molecular clock; mutation accumulation; mutational bias; nuclear; transition/transversion ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31056389      PMCID: PMC6529271          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  43 in total

1.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  The Measurement of Gene Mutation Rate in Drosophila, Its High Variability, and Its Dependence upon Temperature.

Authors:  H J Muller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1928-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance.

Authors:  S E Luria; M Delbrück
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Mutation pressure and the evolution of organelle genomic architecture.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Britt Koskella; Sarah Schaack
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  DinB upregulation is the sole role of the SOS response in stress-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Galhardo; Robert Do; Masami Yamada; Errol C Friedberg; P J Hastings; Takehiko Nohmi; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Adaptive reversion of a frameshift mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Cairns; P L Foster
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The yeast environmental stress response regulates mutagenesis induced by proteotoxic stress.

Authors:  Erika Shor; Catherine A Fox; James R Broach
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Does mutation rate depend on itself.

Authors:  Charles F Baer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Mutation rate plasticity in rifampicin resistance depends on Escherichia coli cell-cell interactions.

Authors:  Rok Krašovec; Roman V Belavkin; John A D Aston; Alastair Channon; Elizabeth Aston; Bharat M Rash; Manikandan Kadirvel; Sarah Forbes; Christopher G Knight
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Inferring evolutionary dynamics of mutation rates through the lens of mutation spectrum variation.

Authors:  Jedidiah Carlson; William S DeWitt; Kelley Harris
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Selection signatures in melanocortin-1 receptor gene of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) raised in hot humid tropics.

Authors:  S O Durosaro; B M Ilori; O S Iyasere; O G George; O A Adewumi; P A Ojo; T A Yusuff; M R Adetifa; T S Atanda; M O Ozoje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  The Spectrum of Spontaneous Rifampin Resistance Mutations in the Bacillus subtilis rpoB Gene Depends on the Growth Environment.

Authors:  Joss D Leehan; Wayne L Nicholson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Recent insights into the evolution of mutation rates in yeast.

Authors:  Robert H Melde; Kevin Bao; Nathaniel P Sharp
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.665

5.  Are mutations usually deleterious? A perspective on the fitness effects of mutation accumulation.

Authors:  Kevin Bao; Robert H Melde; Nathaniel P Sharp
Journal:  Evol Ecol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.074

6.  Neural networks enable efficient and accurate simulation-based inference of evolutionary parameters from adaptation dynamics.

Authors:  Grace Avecilla; Julie N Chuong; Fangfei Li; Gavin Sherlock; David Gresham; Yoav Ram
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 9.593

7.  Variable Spontaneous Mutation and Loss of Heterozygosity among Heterozygous Genomes in Yeast.

Authors:  Duong T Nguyen; Baojun Wu; Hongan Long; Nan Zhang; Caitlyn Patterson; Stephen Simpson; Krystalynne Morris; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch; Weilong Hao
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Asexual Experimental Evolution of Yeast Does Not Curtail Transposable Elements.

Authors:  Piaopiao Chen; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Loss of Heterozygosity and Base Mutation Rates Vary Among Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hybrid Strains.

Authors:  Ajith V Pankajam; Suman Dash; Asma Saifudeen; Abhishek Dutta; Koodali T Nishant
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  The rate and molecular spectrum of mutation are selectively maintained in yeast.

Authors:  Haoxuan Liu; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.