Literature DB >> 35622868

Neural networks enable efficient and accurate simulation-based inference of evolutionary parameters from adaptation dynamics.

Grace Avecilla1,2, Julie N Chuong1,2, Fangfei Li3, Gavin Sherlock3, David Gresham1,2, Yoav Ram4.   

Abstract

The rate of adaptive evolution depends on the rate at which beneficial mutations are introduced into a population and the fitness effects of those mutations. The rate of beneficial mutations and their expected fitness effects is often difficult to empirically quantify. As these 2 parameters determine the pace of evolutionary change in a population, the dynamics of adaptive evolution may enable inference of their values. Copy number variants (CNVs) are a pervasive source of heritable variation that can facilitate rapid adaptive evolution. Previously, we developed a locus-specific fluorescent CNV reporter to quantify CNV dynamics in evolving populations maintained in nutrient-limiting conditions using chemostats. Here, we use CNV adaptation dynamics to estimate the rate at which beneficial CNVs are introduced through de novo mutation and their fitness effects using simulation-based likelihood-free inference approaches. We tested the suitability of 2 evolutionary models: a standard Wright-Fisher model and a chemostat model. We evaluated 2 likelihood-free inference algorithms: the well-established Approximate Bayesian Computation with Sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC) algorithm, and the recently developed Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) algorithm, which applies an artificial neural network to directly estimate the posterior distribution. By systematically evaluating the suitability of different inference methods and models, we show that NPE has several advantages over ABC-SMC and that a Wright-Fisher evolutionary model suffices in most cases. Using our validated inference framework, we estimate the CNV formation rate at the GAP1 locus in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to be 10-4.7 to 10-4 CNVs per cell division and a fitness coefficient of 0.04 to 0.1 per generation for GAP1 CNVs in glutamine-limited chemostats. We experimentally validated our inference-based estimates using 2 distinct experimental methods-barcode lineage tracking and pairwise fitness assays-which provide independent confirmation of the accuracy of our approach. Our results are consistent with a beneficial CNV supply rate that is 10-fold greater than the estimated rates of beneficial single-nucleotide mutations, explaining the outsized importance of CNVs in rapid adaptive evolution. More generally, our study demonstrates the utility of novel neural network-based likelihood-free inference methods for inferring the rates and effects of evolutionary processes from empirical data with possible applications ranging from tumor to viral evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35622868      PMCID: PMC9140244          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   9.593


  86 in total

1.  Development of a Comprehensive Genotype-to-Fitness Map of Adaptation-Driving Mutations in Yeast.

Authors:  Sandeep Venkataram; Barbara Dunn; Yuping Li; Atish Agarwala; Jessica Chang; Emily R Ebel; Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Lucas Hérissant; Jamie R Blundell; Sasha F Levy; Daniel S Fisher; Gavin Sherlock; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Spontaneous Changes in Ploidy Are Common in Yeast.

Authors:  Yaniv Harari; Yoav Ram; Nimrod Rappoport; Lilach Hadany; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  The evolution of the GALactose utilization pathway in budding yeasts.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Harrison; Abigail L LaBella; Chris Todd Hittinger; Antonis Rokas
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Population size mediates the contribution of high-rate and large-benefit mutations to parallel evolution.

Authors:  Martijn F Schenk; Mark P Zwart; Sungmin Hwang; Philip Ruelens; Edouard Severing; Joachim Krug; J Arjan G M de Visser
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 19.100

5.  Fragile genomic sites are associated with origins of replication.

Authors:  Sara C Di Rienzi; David Collingwood; M K Raghuraman; Bonita J Brewer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  On measuring selection in experimental evolution.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations.

Authors:  Gregory I Lang; David Botstein; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mutations that improve efficiency of a weak-link enzyme are rare compared to adaptive mutations elsewhere in the genome.

Authors:  Andrew B Morgenthaler; Wallis R Kinney; Christopher C Ebmeier; Corinne M Walsh; Daniel J Snyder; Vaughn S Cooper; William M Old; Shelley D Copley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  The distribution of fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  R Craig MacLean; Angus Buckling
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  ImaGene: a convolutional neural network to quantify natural selection from genomic data.

Authors:  Luis Torada; Lucrezia Lorenzon; Alice Beddis; Ulas Isildak; Linda Pattini; Sara Mathieson; Matteo Fumagalli
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.