Literature DB >> 16556832

Mutation pressure and the evolution of organelle genomic architecture.

Michael Lynch1, Britt Koskella, Sarah Schaack.   

Abstract

The nuclear genomes of multicellular animals and plants contain large amounts of noncoding DNA, the disadvantages of which can be too weak to be effectively countered by selection in lineages with reduced effective population sizes. In contrast, the organelle genomes of these two lineages evolved to opposite ends of the spectrum of genomic complexity, despite similar effective population sizes. This pattern and other puzzling aspects of organelle evolution appear to be consequences of differences in organelle mutation rates. These observations provide support for the hypothesis that the fundamental features of genome evolution are largely defined by the relative power of two nonadaptive forces: random genetic drift and mutation pressure.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16556832     DOI: 10.1126/science.1118884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  204 in total

1.  Selection for mitonuclear co-adaptation could favour the evolution of two sexes.

Authors:  Zena Hadjivasiliou; Andrew Pomiankowski; Robert M Seymour; Nick Lane
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Biological significance of RNA editing in cells.

Authors:  Wei Tang; Yongjun Fei; Michael Page
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Testing for selection on synonymous sites in plant mitochondrial DNA: the role of codon bias and RNA editing.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Extensive loss of RNA editing sites in rapidly evolving Silene mitochondrial genomes: selection vs. retroprocessing as the driving force.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Alice H MacQueen; Andrew J Alverson; Jeffrey D Palmer; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Rearrangement and evolution of mitochondrial genomes in parrots.

Authors:  Jessica R Eberhard; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Mitochondrial Mutation Rate, Spectrum and Heteroplasmy in Caenorhabditis elegans Spontaneous Mutation Accumulation Lines of Differing Population Size.

Authors:  Anke Konrad; Owen Thompson; Robert H Waterston; Donald G Moerman; Peter D Keightley; Ulfar Bergthorsson; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The intraspecific variability of mitochondrial genes of Agaricus bisporus reveals an extensive group I intron mobility combined with low nucleotide substitution rates.

Authors:  Banafsheh Jalalzadeh; Idy Carras Saré; Cyril Férandon; Philippe Callac; Mohammad Farsi; Jean-Michel Savoie; Gérard Barroso
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  Yeast Spontaneous Mutation Rate and Spectrum Vary with Environment.

Authors:  Haoxuan Liu; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Higher frequency of intron loss from the promoter proximally paused genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Xue-Nan Li; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.