Literature DB >> 9821343

Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates.

B A Wright1, H Dai.   

Abstract

The detectability of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected modulation rates was assessed using a probe-signal method. With this method, three listeners were led to expect a target modulation rate (4, 32, or 256 Hz) by presenting the signal most often at that rate, and sensitivity to modulation at six other unexpected rates between 4 and 256 Hz was measured via occasionally presented probe modulation rates. The modulation phase was random on each two-interval forced-choice trial and the overall level of the 500-ms broadband carrier was randomly varied between 55 and 75 dB SPL across intervals. The modulation depth at each rate was set so that the modulation was detected on about 90% of the trials when only that rate was presented. Performance at the unexpected rates depended upon the target rate. For the 4-Hz target, modulation at all rates was detected on about 80% of the trials. For the 32- and 256-Hz targets, unexpected modulation rates of 16 Hz and above were detected on 80%-90% of the trials, but modulation rates below 16 Hz were detected nearly at chance. The influence of expectation of modulation rate on the detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation is not readily predicted by current models of modulation detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9821343     DOI: 10.1121/1.423881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Predicting the path of a changing sound: velocity tracking and auditory continuity.

Authors:  Poppy A C Crum; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual learning evidence for tuning to spectrotemporal modulation in the human auditory system.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; David A Eddins; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dynamic Reweighting of Auditory Modulation Filters.

Authors:  Eva R M Joosten; Shihab A Shamma; Christian Lorenzi; Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The Effects of Uncertainty in Level on Speech-on-Speech Masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.