Literature DB >> 26328728

Modulation masking within and across carriers for subjects with normal and impaired hearing.

Aleksander Sek1, Thomas Baer1, William Crinnion1, Alastair Springgay1, Brian C J Moore1.   

Abstract

The detection of amplitude modulation (AM) of a carrier can be impaired by additional (masker) AM applied to the same carrier (within-carrier modulation masking, MM) or to a different carrier (across-carrier MM). These two types of MM were compared for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired subjects. The signal was 4- or 16-Hz sinusoidal AM of a 4000-Hz carrier. Masker AM with depth 0.4 was applied either to the same carrier or to a carrier at 3179 or 2518 Hz. The masker AM rate was 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 times the signal rate. The signal AM depth was varied adaptively to determine the threshold. Both within-carrier and across-carrier MM patterns were similar for the two groups, suggesting that the hypothetical modulation filters are not affected by hearing loss or age. The signal AM detection thresholds were also similar for the two groups. Thresholds in the absence of masker AM were lower (better) for the older hearing-impaired than for the young normal-hearing subjects. Since the masked modulation thresholds were similar for the two groups, it seems unlikely that abnormal MM contributes to the difficulties experienced by older hearing-impaired people in understanding speech in background sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328728     DOI: 10.1121/1.4928135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Rebecca E Millman; Sven L Mattys; André D Gouws; Garreth Prendergast
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Informational masking in the modulation domain.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Mechanisms of Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection for Normal- and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Emmanuel Ponsot; Léo Varnet; Nicolas Wallaert; Elza Daoud; Shihab A Shamma; Christian Lorenzi; Peter Neri
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.