Literature DB >> 31045448

Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Beverley Osei1,2, Lu Xu2,3, Amanda Johnston4, Sara Darko5, Johnson Darko2,6,7, Ernest Osei2,6,7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac catheterization procedures provide tremendous benefits to modern healthcare and the benefit derived by the patient should far outweigh the radiation risk associated with a properly optimized procedure. With increasing utilization of such procedures, there is growing concern regarding the magnitude and variations of dose to patients associated with procedure complexity and techniques parameters. Therefore, this study investigated radiation dose to patients from six cardiac catheterization procedures at our facility and suggest possible initial dose values for benchmark for patient radiation dose from these procedures. This initial benchmark data will be used for clinical radiation dose management which is essential for assessing the impact of any quality improvement initiatives in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the dose parameters of 1000 patients who underwent various cardiac catheterization procedures: left heart catheterization (LH), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), complex PCI, LH with complex PCI, LH with PCI and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemaker in our cardiac catheterization laboratories. Patient's clinical radiation dose data [kerma-area-product (KAP) and air-kerma at the interventional reference point (Ka,r)] and technique parameters (fluoroscopy time, tube potential, current, pulse width and number of cine images) along with demographic information (age, height and weight) were collected from the hospital's RIS (Synapse), Sensis/Syngo Dynamics and Siemens Sensis Stats Manager electronic database. Statistical analysis was performed with the IBM SPSS Modeler v. 18.1 software.
RESULTS: The overall patient median age was 67.0 (range: 26.0-97.0) years and the median body mass index (BMI) was 28.8 (range: 15.9-61.7) kg/m2 . The median KAP for the LH, PCI, LH with complex PCI, complex PCI, LH with PCI and CRT-pacemaker procedures are 44.4 (4.1-203.2), 80.2 (18.9-208.5), 83.7 (48.0-246.1), 113.8 (60.9-284.5), 91.7 (6.0-426.0) and 51.1 (7.0-175.9) Gy-cm2 . The median Ka,r for the LH, PCI, LH with complex PCI, complex PCI, LH with PCI and CRT-pacemaker procedures are 701.0 (35.3-3794.0), 1384.7 (291.7-4021.8), 1607.0 (883.5-4448.3), 2260.2 (867.4-5311.9), 1589.3 (100.2-7237.4) and 463.8 (67.7-1695.9) mGy respectively.
CONCLUSION: We have analyzed patient radiation doses from six commonly used procedures in our cardiac catheterization laboratories and suggested possible initial values for benchmark from these procedures for the fluoroscopy time, KAP and air-kerma at the interventional reference point based on our current practices. Our data compare well with published values reported in the literature by investigators who have also studied patient doses and established benchmark dose levels for their facilities. Procedure-specific benchmark dose data for various groups of patients can provide the motivation for monitoring practices to promote improvements in patient radiation dose optimization in the cardiac catheterization laboratories. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We have investigated local patients' radiation doses and established benchmark radiation data which are essential for assessing the impact of any quality improvement initiatives for radiation dose optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31045448      PMCID: PMC6636266          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  44 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dermatitis: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment 2006.

Authors:  Sharon R Hymes; Eric A Strom; Caroline Fife
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 3.  New ICRP recommendations.

Authors:  A D Wrixon
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 1.394

4.  Radiation dose during coronary angiogram: relation to body mass index.

Authors:  Ashish Shah; Paul Das; Eduardas Subkovas; Ashesh N Buch; Michael Rees; Christopher Bellamy
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.975

5.  Analysis of a Low Dose Protocol to Reduce Patient Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Davide Maccagni; Cosmo Godino; Azeem Latib; Lorenzo Azzalini; Vittorio Pazzanese; Alaide Chieffo; Alberto Margonato; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Georges; Loic Belle; Cécile Ricard; Simon Cattan; Franck Albert; Jean-Lou Hirsch; Jacques Monsegu; Alain Dibie; Khalife Khalife; Christophe Caussin; Carlo Maccia; Bernard Livarek; Michel Hanssen
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures.

Authors:  J T Cusma; M R Bell; M A Wondrow; J P Taubel; D R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Dogan Bor; Turan Olğar; Türkay Toklu; Ayça Cağlan; Elif Onal; Renato Padovani
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Radiation injury is potentially a severe consequence of fluoroscopically guided complex interventions.

Authors:  Louis K Wagner
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Evaluation of patient-absorbed doses during coronary angiography and intervention by femoral and radial artery access.

Authors:  Michael Sandborg; Sven-Göran Fransson; Håkan Pettersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of radiation doses between hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Hailei Lu; Jiahuan Zeng; Yan Zhang; Lujun Shen
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2021-08-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.