Literature DB >> 18440265

Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology.

Dogan Bor1, Turan Olğar, Türkay Toklu, Ayça Cağlan, Elif Onal, Renato Padovani.   

Abstract

Interventional cardiological examinations may be associated with excessive radiation exposures which may cause skin injuries and higher probabilities of stochastic effects. Dose-area product (DAP) and skin doses of 325 patients were measured using alternative dosimetric techniques for different cardiological examinations. Data were collected from five different systems with the involvement of 11 cardiologists. All these dosimetric information has been collected separately for each of 10 projections together with the exposure parameters of X-ray systems. Mean DAP values measured with a transparent ion chamber were 49.1 Gy cm(2), 66.8 Gy cm(2), 106.9 Gy cm(2) and 124.7 Gy cm(2), respectively, for coronary angiography (CA), percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or stent (PT-SI), coronary angiography and/or PTCA and/or stent (CA-PT-SI), and ablation examinations. Radiochromic films, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and point measurement of air kerma (AK) were carried out for skin dose assessments. Skin doses of 23 patients measured with radiochromic films were found to be between 2 Gy and 6 Gy. Although the complexity of the procedures was the major reason for these excessive doses, considerable contributions of high X-ray output of some fluoroscopy units were also noticed. In addition to the direct measurement of DAP, alternative DAP values were also determined from the skin dose measurement techniques; exposed areas were summed on digitized radiochromic films in one technique, The product of AK reading with X-ray field size measured at the patient entrance using slow X-ray films was taken as another DAP. Good correlations were found among the DAP results and also between the entrance skin doses calculated from AK measurements and direct DAP readings (R(2)=0.91). A trigger DAP value of 130 Gy cm(2) for the 2 Gy of skin doses was derived from this relationship. Collection of dosimetric data for each projection was also investigated regarding a possible standardization of clinical techniques; in the case of coronary angiography examinations LAO 45 and RAO 30 were found as the dominant projections which may also simplify the dosimetric technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18440265     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  9 in total

1.  Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  N Journy; S Sinno-Tellier; C Maccia; A Le Tertre; P Pirard; P Pagès; D Eilstein; J Donadieu; O Bar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Reference air kerma and kerma-area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Deukwoo Kwon; Mark P Little; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  How accurately can the peak skin dose in fluoroscopy be determined using indirect dose metrics?

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Joe E Ensor; Alexander S Pasciak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Beverley Osei; Lu Xu; Amanda Johnston; Sara Darko; Johnson Darko; Ernest Osei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Evaluation of radiation dose to patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand.

Authors:  J Urairat; S Asavaphatiboon; S Singhara Na Ayuthaya; N Pongnapang
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  The radiation burden from increasingly complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Avnesh S Thakor; Andrew Winterbottom; Mathew Mercuri; Claire Cousins; Michael E Gaunt
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-07-31

7.  Establishing a diagnostic reference level of radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Vikas Kataria; Ishita Yaduvanshi; Gautam Singal; Mohan Nair
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2021-09-21

8.  Dose evaluation for skin and organ in hepatocellular carcinoma during angiographic procedure.

Authors:  Daniela D'Alessio; Claudia Giliberti; Antonella Soriani; Livio Carpanese; Giuseppe Pizzi; Giulio Vallati; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-25

9.  Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals.

Authors:  James A Crowhurst; Mark Whitby; David Thiele; Toni Halligan; Adam Westerink; Suzanne Crown; Jillian Milne
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.