Literature DB >> 18495983

New ICRP recommendations.

A D Wrixon1.   

Abstract

This paper provides a review of the 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). These new recommendations take account of the latest biological and physical information and consolidate the additional guidance provided by ICRP since 1990. The changes to the scientific data are not substantial. ICRP has retained its fundamental hypothesis for the induction of stochastic effects of linearity of dose and effect without threshold and a dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) of 2 to derive nominal risk coefficients for low doses and low dose rates. While the overall detriment from low radiation doses has remained unchanged, ICRP has made adjustments to the values of the radiation and tissue weighting factors. In particular, the tissue weighting factor for breast has increased while that for gonads has decreased. There are some presentational changes to the system of protection. While ICRP has maintained the three fundamental principles--justification, optimisation of protection, and dose limitation-it has attempted to develop a more holistic approach to radiological protection covering all exposure situations--planned, existing and emergency--and all radiation sources, whether of natural or artificial origin. This approach should ensure that attention is focused on those exposures that can reasonably be controlled. It has also strengthened the principle of optimisation of protection with a particular emphasis on the use of constraints for planned exposure situations and reference levels for existing and emergency exposure situations. Dose constraints and reference levels are categorised into three bands which should assist in rationalising the many values of dose restrictions given in earlier ICRP publications. There are no changes to the dose limits. ICRP also indicates its intentions with respect to the development of further guidance on the protection of the environment. The fact that these new recommendations are more a matter of consolidation of previous ICRP recommendations and guidance should provide confidence that the system of protection established by and large in its present form several decades ago has reached a certain level of maturity. As such, no major changes to radiological protection regulations based on the 1990 recommendations should be necessary.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18495983     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/2/R02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  59 in total

1.  Data analysis of low dose multislice helical CT scan in orbital trauma.

Authors:  Ji-Wei Wang; Chong Tang; Bo-Rong Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Assessment of Radiation Safety Knowledge Among Urology Residents in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew M Harris; John Loomis; Marilyn Hopkins; Jason Bylund
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

4.  Reaching for better image quality and lower radiation dose in head and neck CT: advanced modeled and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction in combination with tube voltage adaptation.

Authors:  Andrea I Schmid; Michael Uder; Michael M Lell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Eduardo N P Lima; Bruna R C Macedo; Jorge L F A Conrado; Elvira F Marques; Rubens Chojniak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Instantaneous exposure to nuclear medicine staff involved in PET-CT imaging in developing countries: experience from a tertiary care centre in India.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Anil Kumar Pandey; Punit Sharma; Shamim Ahmed Shamim; Arun Malhotra; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Assessing radiation exposure during endoscopic-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Andrea G Lantz; Padraic O'Malley; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Benefits of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Ahmad Farshid; Jaya Chandrasekhar; Donald McLean
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.