Literature DB >> 3103731

Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones.

J P Neoptolemos, D L Carr-Locke, D P Fossard.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty patients with known common bile duct stones were entered into a prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone clearance (group 1) versus surgery alone (group 2). Five patients were incorrectly entered; the 55 patients randomised to group 1 and the 60 randomised to group 2 were well matched with respect to clinical features and biochemical and medical risk factors. In group 1 endoscopic stone clearance was successful in 50 patients (91%); five of these patients refused elective surgery, though this was subsequently necessary in one. In group 2 common bile duct stones were cleared surgically in 54 of 59 patients (91.5%); one patient was treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy alone because of a myocardial infarct. The overall major complication rate in group 1 was 16.4% and included two deaths; in group 2 this was 8.5% and included one death. The minor complication rate in group 1 was 16.4% and that in group 2 13.6%. These differences in outcome were not significant. Despite a significant reduction in total hospital stay of patients in group 1, these results do not support the routine use of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients having biliary surgery for stones in the common bile duct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3103731      PMCID: PMC1245519          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6570.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  29 in total

1.  Prophylactic use of cephazolin against wound sepsis after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C J Strachan; J Black; S J Powis; T A Waterworth; R Wise; A R Wilkinson; D W Burdon; M Severn; B Mitra; H Norcott
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-05-14

2.  The incidence and causes of death following surgery for nonmalignant biliary tract disease.

Authors:  C K McSherry; F Glenn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The value of choledochoscopy in exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; K L Mattox; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Impact of choledochoscopy on the management of choledocholithiasis. Experience with 499 common duct explorations at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  D W Rattner; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The early and long term results of 500 consecutive explorations of the common duct.

Authors:  R E Larson; J R Hodgson; J T Priestley
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1966-04

6.  Multivariate analysis of clinical and operative findings associated with bilary sepsis.

Authors:  M R Keighley; R Flinn; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  T Leese; J P Neoptolemos; A R Baker; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Factors affecting mortality in biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  H A Pitt; J L Cameron; R G Postier; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  One per cent incidence of recurrent gallstones six to eight years after manometric cholangiography.

Authors:  T T White; J Bordley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Exploration of the common bile duct: a comparative study.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; P H Powell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  62 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Ebner; J Rechner; S Beller; K Erhart; F M Riegler; G Szinicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D Scott-Coombes; J N Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

6.  Future needs for ERCP: incidence of conditions leading to bile duct obstruction and requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic biliary procedures.

Authors:  M W Gear; N A Dent; D G Colin-Jones; J H Lennard-Jones; J R Colley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Endoscopic removal of common duct stones: current indications and controversies.

Authors:  R C Horton; A Lauri; J S Dooley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S C Stain; H Cohen; M Tsuishoysha; A J Donovan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  [Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

Authors:  U T Hopt; U Adam
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Laparoscopic trans-cystic-duct common-bile-duct exploration.

Authors:  E H Phillips; R J Rosenthal; B J Carroll; M J Fallas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.