Literature DB >> 466018

Exploration of the common bile duct: a comparative study.

K D Vellacott, P H Powell.   

Abstract

The results of a retrospective comparative study of 122 patients who underwent explorations of the common bile duct in a district general hospital over a 5-year period are presented. Seventy-eight patients had a supraduodenal choledochotomy, 32 had a transduodenal spincterotomy and 12 had a combination of both procedures. Particular attention was paid to postoperative complications in relation to the grade of the surgeon performing the operation and also to the age of the patient. A total of 78 (64 per cent) patients had definite stones in the common bile duct. Of these patients, 7 (9 per cent) were subsequently shown to have retained stones, all having been operated on by registrars. Registrars also did more negative explorations than consultants. Nine patients (7.4 per cent) died, all but 1 of them being over the age of 70 and 4 of them having had a combined procedure. We conclude that transduodenal exploration should be avoided in patients over 70, particularly when added to a supraduodenal exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 466018     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800660605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  43 in total

1.  Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  R D Ellis; A P Jenkins; R P Thompson; R J Ede
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ahmed A ElGeidie; Gamal K ElEbidy; Yussef M Naeem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Endoscopic removal of common duct stones: current indications and controversies.

Authors:  R C Horton; A Lauri; J S Dooley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Biliary duct stones: percutaneous transhepatic removal.

Authors:  K R Stokes; M E Clouse
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1990 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Biliary concrements: the endoscopic approach.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; M Osnes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Six hundred patients with gallstones.

Authors:  D J Warwick; M H Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Choledochoscopy during biliary surgery for reducing the risk of overlooked stones.

Authors:  T Takada; H Yasuda; K Uchiyama; H Hasegawa; J Shikata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A 10 year single centre experience of percutaneous and endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones with T tube in situ.

Authors:  E Nussinson; S R Cairns; D Vaira; J F Dowsett; R R Mason
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Surgery for common bile duct stones--a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century?

Authors:  Harald Puhalla; Nathan Flint; Nicholas O'Rourke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Common bile duct stenting for choledocholithiasis: a district general hospital experience.

Authors:  D J Bowrey; L J Fligelstone; A Solomon; G Thomas; A A Shandall
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.