Literature DB >> 7369825

The value of choledochoscopy in exploration of the common bile duct.

D V Feliciano, K L Mattox, G L Jordan.   

Abstract

Direct visualization of the biliary tree using choledochoscopy has been recommended as a technique to improve the accuracy of common duct exploration. In several series the incidence of retained biliary calculi has been dramatically reduced using choledochoscopy, and some authors have reported the findings of other unsuspected benign and malignant lesions as well. During an eight-year period 288 patients underwent exploration of the common bile duct specifically for calculous disease. Operative rigid choledochoscopy was performed in 140 patients in this group, with 79 found to have choledocholithiasis; seven retained stones occurred in this group for an incidence of 8.9%. Routine common duct exploration in the other 148 patients revealed 67 to have choledocholithiasis; six retained stones occurred in this group for an incidence of 9.0%. Though there was no difference in the incidence of retained stones with or without choledochoscopy, 20 patients were found to have stones missed during routine exploration once the rigid choledochoscope was inserted. In addition to the obvious value of the choledochoscope in identifying and removing common duct stones, it was also found to be an aid in removing stones in the intra-hepatic ducts and in clarifying atypical anatomy. Other causes of biliary obstruction such as a liver fluke, benign polyp, benign strictures, and ductal carcinomas were identified by use of biopsy forceps inserted through the choledochoscope. It is recommended that routine choledochoscopy be performed during common duct explorations and that surgical training programs insure that residents learn the technique of operative choledochoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7369825      PMCID: PMC1344758          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198005000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  18 in total

1.  Influence of choledochoscopy on the choice of surgical procedure.

Authors:  C J Schein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Complications of nonoperative extraction of retained common duct stones.

Authors:  H J Burhenne
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Retained bile duct stones.

Authors:  L Bergdahl; D E Holmlund
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1976

4.  Intraoperative endoscopic evaluation of the bile ducts.

Authors:  L W Ottinger; A L Warshaw; M K Bartlett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Failure of operative cholangiography to prevent retained common duct stones.

Authors:  R C Hall; P Sakiyalak; S K Kim; L S Rogers; W R Webb
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  L W Way; W H Admirand; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  An improved rigid choledochoscope.

Authors:  J M Shore; L Morgenstern; G Berci
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Operative biliary endoscopy: experience with the flexible choledochoscope in 100 consecutive choledocholithotomies.

Authors:  J M Shore; E Shore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Reappraisal of the possible role of heparin in solution of gallstones: a clinical extension of laboratory studies in removal of retained common duct stones.

Authors:  B Gardner; A Ostrowitz; R Masur
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Operative endoscopy in the management of biliary tract neoplasms.

Authors:  R K Tompkins; J Johnson; F K Storm; W P Longmire
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  20 in total

1.  Choledochoscopy. A cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  D M Nagorney; J L Lohmuller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S C Stain; H Cohen; M Tsuishoysha; A J Donovan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S Lyass; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Open common bile duct exploration--end of an epoch?

Authors:  S T O'Sullivan; D J Hehir; G C O'Sullivan; W O Kirwan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Primary endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) in patients with stones in the common bile duct and the gallbladder in situ: a 5-8-year follow-up study.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; J H Solhaug
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A scientific evaluation of operative choledochoscopy in acute cholangitis.

Authors:  W Y Lau; K K Chong; S T Fan; K W Chu; W C Yip; G P Poon; K K Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The impact of electronic imaging in intraoperative biliary endoscopy (choledochoscopy).

Authors:  G Berci; L Morgenstern; M Paz-Partlow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intraoperative endoscopy of the biliary tract.

Authors:  J E Thompson; R S Bennion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Choledochoscopy? Post-exploratory fluorocholangiography? Or both?

Authors:  A L Leahy; A L Peel
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Experience with the flexible fiberoptic choledochoscope.

Authors:  J J Bauer; B A Salky; I M Gelernt; I Kreel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.