Literature DB >> 16568257

[Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

U T Hopt1, U Adam.   

Abstract

At the moment, therapeutic splitting is still regarded by the vast majority of surgeons as the gold standard for stones in the common bile duct. Endoscopic clearance of the duct certainly is much less invasive than open exploration. However, this does not apply when compared with laparoscopic stone removal. Both are equivalent in respect to stone clearance rates, but the laparoscopic techniques protect patients from the long-term sequelae of endoscopic papillotomy. This can be important particularly for younger patients. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration is cost-effective and safe. Special experience in laparoscopic surgical techniques, however, is mandatory. Thus, surgeons should intensify their training in laparoscopic bile duct exploration in order to increase the acceptance of these techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568257     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-006-1178-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  44 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J Hochberger; S Tex; J Maiss; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2003-10

3.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones.

Authors:  K F Binmoeller; T W Schafer
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  A retrospective study of surgical common bile-duct exploration: ten years experience.

Authors:  J A Roukema; E J Carol; F Liem; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Neth J Surg       Date:  1986-02

6.  Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J Sand; I Airo; K M Hiltunen; J Mattila; I Nordback
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Selective cholangiography in 600 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with 5-year follow-up for residual bile duct stones.

Authors:  H Charfare; S Cheslyn-Curtis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  A Waage; C Strömberg; C-E Leijonmarck; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy.

Authors:  Hiromi Tokumura; Akiko Umezawa; Hui Cao; Nobuhide Sakamoto; Yoichi Imaoka; Akio Ouchi; Kyoji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

10.  Biliary sequelae of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  C Greenfield; P Cleland; R Dick; S Masters; J A Summerfield; S Sherlock
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.401

View more
  1 in total

1.  Treatment of common bile duct stones in Sweden 1989-2006: an observational nationwide study of a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Birger Sandzén; Markku M Haapamäki; Erik Nilsson; Hans C Stenlund; Mikael Oman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.