Gestational protein restriction was associated with low birth weight, hypertension and higher prevalence of cardiac disorders in adults. Several mechanisms, including epigenetics, could be related with the cardiovascular phenotype on protein-restricted offspring. Thus, we investigated the morphological cardiac effects of gestational protein restriction and left ventricle miRNAs and target genes expression pattern in both 12-day and 16-week old gestational protein-restricted male offspring. Pregnant Wistar rats were allocated into two groups, according to protein supply during pregnancy: NP (normal protein diet- 17%) or LP (low protein diet-6%). Dams on the gestational protein-restricted diet had lower body weight gain and higher food intake. Gestational protein-restricted offspring had low birth weight, followed by rapidly body weight recovery, hypertension, and increased myocytes cross-sectional area and collagen fraction at 16-week old age. At 12-days old, miR-184, miR-192, miR-376c, miR-380-3p, miR-380-5p, miR-451, and miR-582-3p had increased expression, and miR-547 and miR-743a had decreased expression in the gestational protein-restricted left ventricle. At 16-week old, let-7b, miR-125a-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-182 and miR-188-5p had increased expression and let-7g, miR-107, miR-127, miR-181a, miR-181c, miR-184, miR-324-5p, miR-383, miR-423-5p and miR-484 had decreased expression in gestational protein-restricted left ventricle. Target predicted gene expression analysis showed higher expression of Dnmt3a, Oxct1, Rictor and Trps1 and lower expression of Bbs1 and Calml3 in 12-day old protein-restricted offspring. 16-week old protein-restricted offspring had higher expression of Adrbk1, Bbs1, Dnmt3a, Gpr22, Inppl1, and Oxct1 genes. In conclusion, gestational protein restriction was related to offspring low birth weight, increased systolic blood pressure and morphological heart alterations that could be related to early heart miRNA expression changes that perpetuate into adulthood and which are associated with the regulation of essential genes involved in cardiovascular development, heart morphology, function, and metabolism.
Gestational protein restriction was associated with low birth weight, hypertension and higher prevalence of cardiac disorders in adults. Several mechanisms, including epigenetics, could be related with the cardiovascular phenotype on protein-restricted offspring. Thus, we investigated the morphological cardiac effects of gestational protein restriction and left ventricle miRNAs and target genes expression pattern in both 12-day and 16-week old gestational protein-restricted male offspring. Pregnant Wistar rats were allocated into two groups, according to protein supply during pregnancy: NP (normal protein diet- 17%) or LP (low protein diet-6%). Dams on the gestational protein-restricted diet had lower body weight gain and higher food intake. Gestational protein-restricted offspring had low birth weight, followed by rapidly body weight recovery, hypertension, and increased myocytes cross-sectional area and collagen fraction at 16-week old age. At 12-days old, miR-184, miR-192, miR-376c, miR-380-3p, miR-380-5p, miR-451, and miR-582-3p had increased expression, and miR-547 and miR-743a had decreased expression in the gestational protein-restricted left ventricle. At 16-week old, let-7b, miR-125a-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-182 and miR-188-5p had increased expression and let-7g, miR-107, miR-127, miR-181a, miR-181c, miR-184, miR-324-5p, miR-383, miR-423-5p and miR-484 had decreased expression in gestational protein-restricted left ventricle. Target predicted gene expression analysis showed higher expression of Dnmt3a, Oxct1, Rictor and Trps1 and lower expression of Bbs1 and Calml3 in 12-day old protein-restricted offspring. 16-week old protein-restricted offspring had higher expression of Adrbk1, Bbs1, Dnmt3a, Gpr22, Inppl1, and Oxct1 genes. In conclusion, gestational protein restriction was related to offspring low birth weight, increased systolic blood pressure and morphological heart alterations that could be related to early heart miRNA expression changes that perpetuate into adulthood and which are associated with the regulation of essential genes involved in cardiovascular development, heart morphology, function, and metabolism.
Several epidemiological and experimental studies have shown associations between
gestational protein restriction, low birth weight and a higher prevalence of
cardiovascular disease in adulthood [1,2]. Initially,
it was thought that the mechanisms causing cardiovascular changes in
protein-restricted offspring might be secondary to the development of arterial
hypertension [3] and
endocrine changes, such as insulin and leptin resistance [4,5]. Alternatively, taking into account the
evidence, studies have shown that primary insults in heart development itself might
predispose to cardiovascular dysfunction later in life. Thus, protein restriction in
the intrauterine environment results in permanent changes in cardiac structure and
function [6,7]. Several authors have shown
maternal protein restriction to lead to impairment in offspring cardiomyocyte
proliferation and differentiation [8,9], reduction
of cardiomyocyte number [10,11], fibrosis
[7,13] and, ultrastructural changes, such as
increased β/α- myosin heavy chain ratio in left ventricle (LV) and increased N2B/
N2BA titin isoforms in LV sarcomeres, that may lead to impaired cardiac function
later in life [11,12]. However, information
regarding the molecular mechanisms of the etiopathogenesis of these cardiac changes
is still scarce.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are genomic-encoded small noncoding RNAs of approximately 22
nucleotides in length that play an essential role in post-transcriptional regulation
of target gene expression [14,15]. miRNAs
control gene expression post-transcriptionally by regulating mRNA translation or
stability in the cytoplasm [16]. Although only recently discovered [17], it has become clear that miRNAs are
critical components of diverse regulatory networks in animals [14].Functional studies indicate that miRNAs are involved in critical biological processes
during development and in cell physiology [15,18], and changes in their expression are
observed in several pathologies [18,19].
Currently, it is known that miRNAs are not only involved in cardiovascular
development and physiology [20,21] but also
in several cardiovascular diseases [22,23].
Therefore, the expressional study of miRNAs and target genes that undergo
miRNA-mediated regulation in the heart may help the understanding of the mechanisms
underlying the cardiovascular phenotype on protein-restricted offspring.This study aimed to evaluate the miRNAs and predicted gene expression pattern on rat
LV in both 12-day and 16-week old gestational protein-restricted male offspring to
elucidate the possible molecular mechanisms involved with the etiology of the
cardiac phenotype observed in gestational protein-restricted offspring. Furthermore,
we wished to evaluate the effects of maternal protein restriction on food
consumption and body weight of both pregnant dams and offspring, systolic blood
pressure in 16-wk old offspring and on cardiac morphometric parameters in both 12-d
and 16-wk old offspring.
Material and methods
Animals and diets
The Institutional Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA/UNICAMP) approved
the experimental protocol (protocol number #315) and the general research
guidelines on animal care established by the Brazilian College of Animal
Experimentation (COBEA) and by NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals were followed throughout the investigation. The experiments were
conducted as described in detail previously [7,24] on age-matched rats of 12-week-old
sibling-mated Wistar HanUnib rats (250–300 g). The local
colonies originated from a breeding stock supplied by the Multidisciplinary
Center for Biological Investigation on Laboratory Animal Science, UNICAMP,
Brazil. Male and female weanling Wistar HanUnib rats were
housed and maintained under a 12-hour day/night cycle (lights on 06.00–19.00 h)
at constant temperature (22±2°C), with standard chow (Nuvital, Curitiba, PR,
Brazil) and water available ad libitum. From 12 to 14 weeks of
age, the animals were mated. Pregnant dams were singly-caged and randomly
assigned either the regular protein diet (NP, 17% casein) or isocaloric low
protein diet (LP, 6% casein) throughout the entire pregnancy. Body weight and
food intake were evaluated weekly in pregnant dams (NP: n = 21; LP: n = 31).
Protein intake in each week was calculated considering the total food intake and
the protein content of each diet. Birth weight and anogenital distance were
measured in male offspring (NP: n = 103; LP: n = 107). Litter size was adjusted
on the birth’s day to eight pups per litter to ensure equal access to
breastfeeding. At 12 days after birth, half of the male offspring of each dam
was euthanized (NP-12d and LP-12d groups). At 21 days after birth, the remaining
male offspring were weaned and caged separately. Body weight was evaluated
weekly from birth to 16 weeks after birth, and food intake was assessed daily
from weaning to 16 weeks after birth when they were euthanized (NP-16w and
LP-16w groups).
Blood pressure measurement
The systolic blood pressure was weekly measured in conscious male offspring from
6 to 16 weeks age (NP-16w: n = 9; LP = 16w: n = 18), employing an indirect tail
plethysmography method. Briefly, an indirect tail-cuff method using an
electro-sphygmomanometer combined with a pneumatic pulse transducer/amplifier
was used (IITC Life Science—BpMonWin Monitor Version 1.33). Measurements were
conducted at the same time during the day. This indirect approach allowed
repeated measurements with close correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.975)
compared with direct intra-arterial recording. The mean of three consecutive
readings was taken as the blood pressure.
LV weight measurement
At 12 days and 16 weeks of age, some male offspring from different litters were
deeply anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (50 mg/kg body weight,
i.p.) and xylazine (1 mg/kg body weight,
i.p.) and were decapitated using sharp
guillotine. Heart LV was dissected (NP-12d: n = 6; LP-12d: n = 6; NP-16w: n = 8;
LP-16w: n = 13), weighed and stored at -80°C. The tibia length was also measured
(NP-12d: n = 6; LP-12d: n = 3; NP-16w: n = 5; LP-16w: n = 11).
Histological analysis
At 12 days and 16 weeks of age, some male offspring from different litters were
anesthetized and had the heart LV perfused with a heparinized saline solution
(1%) and with a 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution in 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH
7.4). After perfusion, the LV was dissected, fixed for 24 hours in the
paraformaldehyde solution, and then embedded in paraplast (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).
Five-micrometer-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or
picrosirius red. The measurements were performed from digital images that were
collected by a video camera attached on an Olympus microscope (x40 magnification
lens), and the images were analyzed by Image J software. The cross-sectional
area (CSA) was measured with a digital pad and the selected cells were
transversely cut so that the nucleus was in the center of the myocyte and
determined as an average of at least 30 myocytes per animal (NP-12d: n = 10;
LP-12d: n = 11; NP-16w: n = 10; LP-16w: n = 13). The heart interstitial collagen
volume fraction, marked by picrosirius, was calculated as the ratio between the
connective tissue area and connective tissue plus myocyte areas, from 30
microscope fields of digitalized images of each animal (NP-12d: n = 9; LP-12d: n
= 11; NP-16w: n = 10; LP-16w: n = 13). Perivascular collagen was excluded from
analysis.
Heart LV miRNA expression
Four male offspring from different litters were used in each group for the miRNA
expression analysis. Total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from LV samples
using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, USA) [25]. Total RNA was quantified (Take3
micro-volume plate—Epoch spectrophotometer; BioTek, USA). The RNA integrity was
evaluated by electrophoresis on a denaturing agarose gel stained with GelRed
Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Uniscience, USA) and the RNA purity was assessed by the
ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. Briefly, 450 ng RNA was reverse
transcribed using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit and Megaplex RT
Primers Rodent Pool A (Life Technologies, USA), according to the manufacturer’s
guidelines. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was amplified using a TaqMan Rodent
MicroRNA Array A v2.0 with TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix on QuantStudio 12K
Flex System (Life Technologies, USA), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Data analysis was performed using relative gene expression
evaluated using the comparative quantification method [26]. The U87 gene was used as a reference
gene. Mean relative quantity was calculated and miRNAs differentially expressed
between groups (LP-12d versus NP-12d and LP-16w versus NP-16w) were evaluated.
miRNA data have been generated following the MIQE guidelines [27].
Target prediction
In silico target, the prediction was performed for
differentially expressed miRNAs using the combined analysis of three algorithms
based on conservation criteria TargetScan [28], microRNA.org [29] and PicTar [30]. Results were taken from each search
analysis and cross-referenced across all the three research results. To exclude
the hypertension effect on gene expression, only targets predicted in both
12-day and 16-week old animals were considered. Furthermore, only targets genes
expressed in cardiac tissue were used for the analysis. To offer experimental
support to in silico predicted targets, we evaluated the gene
expression by RT-qPCR and quantified the protein levels by western blot
analysis.
Heart LV predicted gene expression
Total RNA was extracted from LV of eight offspring in each group using the Trizol
method [25]. The total
RNA quantity, purity and integrity was assessed as previously described for
miRNAs expression analysis. For the cDNA synthesis, High Capacity cDNA reverse
transcription kit (Life Technologies, USA) was used. For real-time PCR, 2 μl
cDNA (40 ng/ μl) was added to a master mix comprising 10 μl TaqMan Fast Advanced
Master Mix (Life Technologies, EUA), 1 μl primer mix and 7 μl water for
reaction. Water was used in place of cDNA as a non-template control. The cycling
conditions were: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 20 seconds, 50 cycles of 95°C for
1 second and 60°C for 20 seconds. Amplification and detection were performed
using the StepOne Plus (Life Technologies, EUA) and data acquired using the
StepOne Software v2.1 (Life Technologies, EUA). Ct values were converted to
relative expression values using the ΔΔCt method with offspring heart data
normalized to GAPDH as a reference gene. IDT Integrated DNA Technologies
provided primers for mRNA RT-qPCR.
Western blot analysis
Fifteen animals in each group were used to perform the protein level analysis by
western blot. LV was homogenized in solubilization buffer (100mM
Tris-hydroxymethil-aminomethane pH7.4, 10mM sodium pyrophosphate, 100mM sodium
fluoride, 10mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10mM sodium vanadate, 2mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 0,1mg/ml aprotinin) using a polytron PTA 20S
generator (model PT 10/35) Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, N.Y., USA) at
maximum speed. The tissue extracted were incubated with 10% volume Triton-X 100
and then centrifuged at 11.000 rpm at 4°C for 40 minutes. Supernatant proteins
were quantified using Biuret method. The samples were mixture with Laemmli
buffer containing 100mM dithiothreitol, heating at 95°C for 5 minutes. Each
sample (120ug of protein) were subjected to gel electrophoresis in Bio-Rad
minigel apparatus (Mini-Protean SDS-Page, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, C.A.,
USA). Electrotransfer of proteins from the gel to the nitrocellulose membranes
was performed for 90 minutes at 120V. Non-specific protein binding was reduced
by incubating the membrane for 1 hour at ambient temperature in blocking buffer
(5% bovineserum albumin (BSA), 10mM Tris, 150mM NaCl and 0,02% Tween 20).
Primary antibodies were diluted in 3% BSA, 10mM Tris, 150mM NaCl and 0,02% Tween
20. Secondary antibodies were diluted in 1% BSA, 10mM Tris, 150mM NaCl and 0,02%
Tween 20. Antibodies used were: Bbs1 (sc-134455, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA, rabbit polyclonal, 1:500); Calml3 (ab155130, Abcam, Cambridge, MA,
rabbit polyclonal, 1:500); Dnmt3a (ab23565, Abcam, rabbit polyclonal, 1:500);
Oxct1 (ab105320, Abcam, rabbit polyclonal, 1:500); Rictor (sc-99004, Santa Cruz,
rabbit polyclonal, 1:500); Trps1 (sc-26974, Santa Cruz, goat polyclonal, 1:500);
Alpha-tubulin (#2144, Cell Signalling Technology, Dancers, MA, rabbit
polyclonal, 1:1000); Goat-anti-rabbit (31460, Pierce Biotechnology, Waltham, MA
1:5000) and Rabbit-anti-goat (31402, Pierce Biotechnology, 1:5000).
Immunoreactive bands were detected using the chemiluminescence method
(SuperSignal West Pico Chemilluminescent Substrate, Thermo Scientific, USA).
Images of the developed radiographs were scanned (HP Deskjet Ink Advantage 4625)
and the bands intensities were quantified by optical densitometry using the
Scion Image software.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or as the median with
interquartile range [lower quartile—upper quartile] and was previously tested
for normality and equality of variance. Comparisons between two groups were
performed using Student’s t-test when data were normally distributed and the
Mann-Whitney test when distributions were non-normal. Comparisons between two
groups through the weeks were performed using 2-way ANOVA for repeated
measurements test, in which the first factor was the protein content in pregnant
dam’s diet and the second factor was time. When an interaction was found to be
significant, the mean values were compared using Tukey´s post hoc analysis.
Significant differences in miRNA expression were detected using a moderated
t-test. Data analysis was performed with Sigma Plot v12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,
IL, USA). The significance level was 5%.
Results
Effect of protein restriction on body weight and food intake of pregnant
rats
Dams on LP diet during pregnancy were lighter on second and third weeks of
pregnancy compared with dams on NP diet, despite an equal body weight in the
first week of pregnancy (pdiet x time < 0.001; pdiet =
0.007; ptime < 0.001; Fig 1A). Thus, considering the entire pregnancy weeks, dams in the
LP group had lower weight gain than those in the NP group (NP (n = 21): 109.86 ±
20.04 g; LP (n = 31): 87.00 ± 14.01 g; p<0.001).
Fig 1
Body weight, food and protein intake of pregnant dams during
gestation.
(A) Weekly body weight; pinteraction<0.001;
pdiet = 0.007; ptime<0.001. (B) Weekly food
intake; pinteraction = 0.018; pdiet<0.001;
ptime = 0.118. (C) Weekly protein intake;
pinteraction = 0.018; pdiet<0.001;
ptime = 0.069. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. NP
(n = 21): normal protein diet group; LP (n = 31): low protein diet
group. *Significant difference between week-matched NP x LP groups
(p≤0.05).
Body weight, food and protein intake of pregnant dams during
gestation.
(A) Weekly body weight; pinteraction<0.001;
pdiet = 0.007; ptime<0.001. (B) Weekly food
intake; pinteraction = 0.018; pdiet<0.001;
ptime = 0.118. (C) Weekly protein intake;
pinteraction = 0.018; pdiet<0.001;
ptime = 0.069. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. NP
(n = 21): normal protein diet group; LP (n = 31): low protein diet
group. *Significant difference between week-matched NP x LP groups
(p≤0.05).The weekly food intake was higher in LP dams in the first two weeks of pregnancy
compared to NP dams (pdiet x time = 0.018; pdiet <
0.001; ptime < 0.118; Fig 1B). However, in the last week of pregnancy, there was no
difference in food intake between the groups. Despite the higher food intake by
LP dams during pregnancy, the assessment of weekly protein intake showed that
dams from the LP group were exposed to severe protein restriction during the
entire pregnancy (pdiet x time = 0.018; pdiet < 0.001;
ptime = 0.069; Fig
1C).
Effect of gestational protein restriction on offspring phenotype
Male offspring from LP dams had lower birth weight (p<0.001; Fig 2A) and higher anogenital
distance (p = 0.018; Fig 2B)
compared with offspring from NP dams. At 12 days after birth, offspring from
NP-12d and LP-12d groups showed no significant difference on body weight (p =
0.126; Fig 2C).
Fig 2
Male offspring birth weight, anogenital distance and male offspring
12 days old body weight.
(A) Male offspring birth weight; p<0.001. (B) Male offspring
anogenital distance; p = 0.018. (C) 12-days male offspring body weight;
p = 0.126. Data were expressed as the median [lower quartile—upper
quartile]. NP: normal protein diet group; LP: low protein diet group.
*Significant difference between NP x LP groups (p≤0.05).
Male offspring birth weight, anogenital distance and male offspring
12 days old body weight.
(A) Male offspring birth weight; p<0.001. (B) Male offspring
anogenital distance; p = 0.018. (C) 12-days male offspring body weight;
p = 0.126. Data were expressed as the median [lower quartile—upper
quartile]. NP: normal protein diet group; LP: low protein diet group.
*Significant difference between NP x LP groups (p≤0.05).Measurements on offspring in the 16-week groups showed no interaction between the
factors and no significant difference related to protein content in pregnant
dam’s diet were observed for weekly body weight (pdiet x time =
0.223; pdiet = 0.173; ptime < 0.001; Fig 3A). Analyzing the weekly
food intake, although there was no interaction effect, the protein content in
pregnant dam’s diet influenced this variable and, in general, LP offspring had
lower food intake than NP offspring (pdiet x time = 0.275;
pdiet < 0.001; ptime < 0.001; Fig 3B).
Fig 3
Body weight, food and systolic blood pressure of the 16-week old
groups.
(A) Weekly body weight. pinteraction = 0.223; pdiet
= 0.173; ptime<0.001. (B) Weekly food intake.
pinteraction = 0.275; pdiet<0.001;
ptime<0.001. (C) Systolic blood pressure.
pinteraction<0.001; pdiet<0.001;
ptime<0.001. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD.
NP-16w (n = 9): normal protein diet group followed until 16 weeks old;
LP-16w (n = 18): low protein diet group followed until 16 weeks old.
*Significant difference between week-matched NP-16w x LP-16w groups (p ≤
0.05).
Body weight, food and systolic blood pressure of the 16-week old
groups.
(A) Weekly body weight. pinteraction = 0.223; pdiet
= 0.173; ptime<0.001. (B) Weekly food intake.
pinteraction = 0.275; pdiet<0.001;
ptime<0.001. (C) Systolic blood pressure.
pinteraction<0.001; pdiet<0.001;
ptime<0.001. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD.
NP-16w (n = 9): normal protein diet group followed until 16 weeks old;
LP-16w (n = 18): low protein diet group followed until 16 weeks old.
*Significant difference between week-matched NP-16w x LP-16w groups (p ≤
0.05).An interaction between the factors protein content in pregnant dam’s diet and
time was found analyzing the systolic blood pressure from 6 to 16 weeks after
birth. Animals from the LP-16w group had higher systolic blood pressure during 9
to 16 weeks of age compared to age-matched NP-16w group (pdiet x time
< 0.001; pdiet < 0.001; ptime < 0.001; Fig 3C).The morphometric analysis of the heart showed no differences were found for the
LV weight comparing NP-12d versus LP-12d groups for both normalization to body
weight (p = 0.453) and tibia length (p = 0.337) and then comparing NP-16w versus
LP-16w groups for both normalization to body weight (p = 0.796) and tibia length
(p = 0.259) (Table 1).
Otherwise, the histologic analysis of the heart showed that the LP-16w group had
higher myocyte CSA (p<0.001) and higher interstitial collagen volume fraction
(p<0.001) compared to the NP-16w group (Table 1; Fig 4).
Table 1
Cardiac left ventricle weight, myocyte cross-sectional area and
interstitial collagen volume fraction.
NP-12d¤
LP-12d¤
p¤
NP-16w¤
LP-16w¤
p¤
LV weight/ Body weight
(kg/g)¤
3.11±0.42 (n = 6)
2.97±0.15 (n = 6)
0.453
1.80±0.10 (n = 8)
1.81±0.12 (n = 13)
0.796
LV weight/ Tibial length (kg/mm)
¤
6.36±0.63 (n = 6)
5.88±0.75 (n = 3)
0.337
20.48±1.72 (n = 5)
19.38±1.73 (n = 11)
0.259
CSA
(μm2) ¤
27.4±2.7 (n = 10)
27.6±0.9 (n = 11)
0.777
139.0±6.2 (n = 10)
212.5±14.5 (n = 13)*
<0.001
Interstitial collagen fraction
(%)¤
0.94±0.17 (n = 9)
1.00±0.22 (n = 11)
0.553
1.24±0.26 (n = 10)
2.26±0.55 (n = 13)*
<0.001
LV: left ventricle; CSA: myocyte cross-sectional area. Data are
expressed as the mean±SD. NP-12d: normal protein group followed
until 12 days old; LP-12d: low protein group followed until 12 days
old. NP-16w: normal protein group followed until 16 weeks old;
LP-16w: low protein group followed until 16 weeks old.
*Significant difference between age-matched groups (p ≤ 0.05).
Fig 4
Histological representative images of 12 days and 16 weeks old
animals.
Representative myocyte cross-sectional area in (A) NP-12d; (B) LP-12d;
(C) NP-16w; (D) LP-16w; Representative interstitial collagen fraction in
(E) NP-12d; (F) LP-12d; (G) NP-16w; (H) LP-16w.
Histological representative images of 12 days and 16 weeks old
animals.
Representative myocyte cross-sectional area in (A) NP-12d; (B) LP-12d;
(C) NP-16w; (D) LP-16w; Representative interstitial collagen fraction in
(E) NP-12d; (F) LP-12d; (G) NP-16w; (H) LP-16w.LV: left ventricle; CSA: myocyte cross-sectional area. Data are
expressed as the mean±SD. NP-12d: normal protein group followed
until 12 days old; LP-12d: low protein group followed until 12 days
old. NP-16w: normal protein group followed until 16 weeks old;
LP-16w: low protein group followed until 16 weeks old.*Significant difference between age-matched groups (p ≤ 0.05).
Effect of gestational protein restriction on offspring miRNA expression in
early-life and adulthood
Regarding heart, left ventricle miRNA expression, protein-restricted diet during
pregnancy was significantly associated with male offspring altered miRNAs
expression in both early life and adulthood. LP-12d versus NP-12d miRNAs
fold-change depicted by volcano-plot showed a significant change in miRNA
expression in early life (S1A Fig). LP-12d group was associated with
significant up-regulation of mir-184 (p = 0,007), mir-192 (p = 0,019), mir-376c
(p = 0,029) mir-380-3p (p = 0,029), mir-380-5p (p = 0,028), mir-451 (p = 0,013)
and mir-582-3p (p = 0,029) and significant down-regulation of mir-547 (p =
0,022) and mir-743a (p = 0,004) compared to NP-12d group (Fig 5A). Volcano plot data from LP-16w versus
NP-16w depicted in S1B Fig shows a significant change in miRNA
expression in adulthood. The LP-16w group had significant up-regulation of
let-7b (p = 0.017), mir-125a-3p (p<0.001), mir-142-3p (p = 0.035), mir-182 (p
= 0.025) and mir-188-5p (p = 0.029) and significant down-regulation of let-7g (p
= 0.045), mir-107 (p = 0.021), mir-127 (p = 0.029), mir-181a (p = 0.045),
mir-181c (p = 0.029), mir-184 (p = 0.029), mir-324-5p (p = 0.006), mir-383 (p =
0.002), mir-423-5p (p = 0.006) and mir-484 (p = 0,034) when compared to NP-16w
group (Fig 5B).
Fig 5
Differentially expressed miRNA of 12 days and 16 weeks old
animals.
(A) Fold-change and miRNA expression values in LP-12d (n = 4) versus
NP-12d (n = 4); (B) Fold-change and miRNA expression values in LP-16w (n
= 4) versus NP-16w (n = 4). *Significant difference between week-matched
groups (p ≤ 0.05).
Differentially expressed miRNA of 12 days and 16 weeks old
animals.
(A) Fold-change and miRNA expression values in LP-12d (n = 4) versus
NP-12d (n = 4); (B) Fold-change and miRNA expression values in LP-16w (n
= 4) versus NP-16w (n = 4). *Significant difference between week-matched
groups (p ≤ 0.05).
Target prediction analysis
To test for potential mRNA targets of differentially expressed miRNAs,
computational mRNA target prediction was performed. Many target mRNAs were
identified for each of the miRNAs, although the number of targets varied per
miRNA. By exploring the targets of the miRNAs by computational prediction, we
had 165 possible mRNA targets for differentially expressed miRNA in the LP-12d
group, and 281 mRNA targets for differentially expressed miRNA in the LP-16w
group. Confronting the predicted mRNAs for both 12-day and 16-week old groups,
we had 54 possible targets predicted simultaneously for both groups.
Furthermore, selecting only the mRNA targets expressed in heart, we had 24
possible mRNA targets. Table
2 shows all the 24 mRNA targets considered for the analysis and the
respective regulatory miRNA.
Table 2
Predicted mRNAs for the differentially expressed miRNAs in NP-12d
versus LP-12d and NP-16w versus LP-16w groups.
Differentially expressed miRNA
that could regulate the gene
Genesymbol
Gene Name
NP-12d/ LP-12d
NP-16w/ LP-16w
Adrbk1
Adrenergic receptor kinase,
beta 1
mir-423-5p
Akap12
A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein (gravin)
12
mir-184
mir-184
Amotl1
Angiomotin-like 1
mir-184
mir-184
Bbs1
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1
(human)
mir-184
mir-184
Calml3
Calmodulin-like 3
mir-743a
Dab2
Disabled 2,
mitogen-responsive phosphoprotein
mir-743a
Dnmt3a
DNA methyltransferase 3A
mir-582-3p
mir-423-5pmir-484
Gpr22
G protein-coupled receptor
22
mir-192
mir-182
Hbegf
Heparin-binding EGF-like growth
factor
mir-376c
mir-127
Hic2
Hypermethylated in cancer
2
mir-547
mir-127mir-125a-3pmir-484
Inppl1
Inositol polyphosphate
phosphatase-like 1
mir-184
mir-184
Insr
Insulin receptor
mir-743amir-582-3p
Jcad
RIKEN cDNA 9430020K01
gene
mir-743a
mir-423-5p
Mcf2l
Mcf.2 transforming
sequence-like
mir-184
mir-184
Mmp8
Matrix metallopeptidase 8
mir-184
mir-184
Nfat5
Nuclear factor of activated T cells
5
mir-380-5p
mir-324-5p
Odc1
Ornithine decarboxylase,
structural 1
mir-743a
mir-423-5p
Oxct1
3-oxoacid CoA transferase
1
mir-743a
mir-324-5p
Ppp2ca
Protein phosphatase 2,
catalytic subunit
mir-547
mir-141
Rictor
RPTOR independent companion of
MTOR, complex 2
mir-192
let7gmir-142-3pmir-188-5p
Sirt1
Sirtuin 1
mir-141
Tgfbr1
Transforming growth factor,
beta receptor I
mir-125a-3p
Trps1
Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome
I
mir-547
mir-484
Ubn1
Ubinuclein 1
mir-184
mir-184
NP-12d: normal protein group followed until 12 days old; LP-12d: low
protein group followed until 12 days old. NP-16w: normal protein
group followed until 16 weeks old; LP-16w: low protein group
followed until 16 weeks old.
NP-12d: normal protein group followed until 12 days old; LP-12d: low
protein group followed until 12 days old. NP-16w: normal protein
group followed until 16 weeks old; LP-16w: low protein group
followed until 16 weeks old.
Experimental support for predicted regulatory targets: Target’s mRNA RT-qPCR
analysis
miRNAs can regulate post-transcriptional gene expression by targeting mRNAs for
degradation. To explore the potential extent of miRNA-directed regulation of
mRNA levels, RT-qPCR was used to measure mRNAs predicted to be targeted by the
differentially expressed miRNA. The sequences of the primers used are shown in
S1
Table. The results of the RT-qPCR analysis showed that the expression
of Bbs1 and Calml3 genes were downregulated and that the expression of Dnmt3a,
Oxct1, Rictor and Trps1 genes were upregulated in LP-12d versus NP-12d animals
(Fig 6A). Furthermore,
the expression of Adrbk1, Bbs1, Dnmt3a, Gpr22, Inppl1, and Oxct1 genes were
upregulated in LP-16w versus NP-16w animals (Fig 6B). The expression of the other analyzed
genes did not differ between groups.
Fig 6
Targets mRNA expression of 12 days and 16 weeks old animals.
(A) Fold-change of mRNA expression in LP-12d (n = 8) versus NP-12d (n =
8); (B) Fold-change of mRNA expression in LP-16w (n = 8) versus NP-16w
(n = 8). *Significant difference between week-matched groups (p ≤
0.05).
Targets mRNA expression of 12 days and 16 weeks old animals.
(A) Fold-change of mRNA expression in LP-12d (n = 8) versus NP-12d (n =
8); (B) Fold-change of mRNA expression in LP-16w (n = 8) versus NP-16w
(n = 8). *Significant difference between week-matched groups (p ≤
0.05).
Experimental support for predicted regulatory targets using western blot
analysis
We quantified encoded proteins of genes whose expression was changed in the 12d
groups thereby to exclude the possible effect of hypertension in the modulation
of gene expression. The results of western blot analysis showed that LP-12d
animals had lower levels of Bbs1 (NP-12d: 100.0±1.3; LP-12d: 94.7±1.8; p =
0.027) and Calml3 (NP-12d: 100.0±4.33; LP-12d: 84.3±4.1; p = 0.019) proteins in
LV than NP-12d animals. Dnmt3a (NP-12d: 100.0±4.6; LP-12d: 141.3±11.5; p =
0.017) and Oxct1 (NP-12d: 100.0±0.9; LP-12d: 112.3±3.0; p = 0.037) proteins
levels in LV were higher in LP-12d than NP-12d animals. No significant
difference between these groups was found for Rictor (NP-12d: 100.0±2.6; LP-12d:
106.4±3.9; p = 0.176). The LP-16w animals had higher levels of Bbs1 (NP-16w:
100.3±3.4; LP-16w: 111.6±3.1; p = 0.002) and Oxct1 (NP-16w: 100.0±3.1; LP-16w:
133.3±12.7; p = 0.037) proteins in LV compared to NP-16s animals. No significant
difference between these groups was found for Calml3 (NP-16w: 100.0±3.0; LP-16w:
102.3±4.2; p = 0.232), Dnmt3a (NP-16w: 100.0±5.2; LP-16w: 108.3±7.5; p = 0.424)
and Rictor (NP-16w: 100.0±5.1; LP-16w: 102.6±5.8; p = 0.749) (Fig 5). Trps1 protein was not
detected (Fig 7).
Fig 7
Western blot analysis of BBS1, Calml3, Dnmt3a, Oxct1 and Rictor of 12
days and 16 weeks old animals.
(A) BBS1 in LP-12d (n = 12) versus NP-12d (n = 12) and LP-16w (n = 12)
versus NP-16w (n = 9); (B) Calml3 in LP-12d (n = 11) versus NP-12d (n =
8) and LP-16w (n = 11) versus NP-16w (n = 8); (C) Dnmt3a in LP-12d (n =
7) versus NP-12d (n = 5) and LP-16w (n = 7) versus NP-16w (n = 5); (D)
Oxct1 in LP-12d (n = 13) versus NP-12d (n = 9) and LP-16w (n = 15)
versus NP-16w (n = 11); (E) Rictor in LP-12d (n = 9) versus NP-12d (n =
10) and LP-16w (n = 6) versus NP-16w (n = 5). Data were expressed as the
mean ± SD *Significant difference between week-matched groups (p ≤
0.05).
Western blot analysis of BBS1, Calml3, Dnmt3a, Oxct1 and Rictor of 12
days and 16 weeks old animals.
(A) BBS1 in LP-12d (n = 12) versus NP-12d (n = 12) and LP-16w (n = 12)
versus NP-16w (n = 9); (B) Calml3 in LP-12d (n = 11) versus NP-12d (n =
8) and LP-16w (n = 11) versus NP-16w (n = 8); (C) Dnmt3a in LP-12d (n =
7) versus NP-12d (n = 5) and LP-16w (n = 7) versus NP-16w (n = 5); (D)
Oxct1 in LP-12d (n = 13) versus NP-12d (n = 9) and LP-16w (n = 15)
versus NP-16w (n = 11); (E) Rictor in LP-12d (n = 9) versus NP-12d (n =
10) and LP-16w (n = 6) versus NP-16w (n = 5). Data were expressed as the
mean ± SD *Significant difference between week-matched groups (p ≤
0.05).
Discussion
In the present study, protein-restricted offspring showed altered expression of a
large number of heart LV miRNAs and predicted target gene expression was observed in
both early life and adulthood LP offspring. Additionally, LP offspring had low birth
weight, higher systolic blood pressure and changes in cardiac LV morphological
parameters in adulthood compared with age-matched NP rats. Furthermore, this study
showed that protein-restricted dams had a lower body mass gain and higher food
consumption during pregnancy compared to NP rats. These results are supported by
previous studies that showed the orexigenic stimulus and reduced mass gain on
protein-restricted rats compared to isocaloric normal protein rats [31,32,33].In protein-restricted chow, the carbohydrate content is approximately 15% higher than
in normoproteic standard rodent chow. In this way, previous reports have shown that
gastric emptying in LP animals is faster than in NP animals and consequently, the
orexigenic signaling for food intake is rapidly triggered [32,33]. However, despite the increased food
consumption, the experimental protein-restricted model proposed in the present study
was kept.In rats, the anogenital distance can be influenced by the embryo position in the
womb, as well as by the sex of surrounding embryos due to the action of released
steroid hormones [34].
Furthermore, anogenital distance is a sensitive marker of hormonal changes in
rodents, especially from high and persistent steroid serum levels [35]. The placental enzyme
11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11β-HSD) type 2 catalyses the interconversion
of maternal active corticosterone with inert 11-dehydrocorticosterone. In
gestational protein restricted models, the lower concentration and decreased the
activity of 11β-HSD2 enzyme is one of one of the mechanisms involved in the high
exposure of the fetus to maternal glucocorticoids [36]. Thus, early fetal exposure to higher
maternal glucocorticoids levels in gestational protein-restricted offspring may be
responsible, at least in part, for the increased anogenital distance observed in
protein-restricted offspring.Gestational protein restriction is also associated with decreased intrauterine growth
and low birth weight [10,31]. In the
current study, we confirm these results, and we show that male offspring birth
weight from protein-restricted dams was lower when compared to offspring from dams
fed with a standard protein chow. The body mass was assessed from birth up to 16
weeks of life, and beyond the second week of age, we did not find a significant
difference between LP and age-matched NP offspring. The recovery of offspring body
mass after delivery in protein-restricted dams, known as “catch-up” is associated
with a higher growth rate compared to the normal growth curve [37]. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated
that fast mass gain after birth, in maternal LP offspring, is itself a risk factor
for the development of hypertension [38], reduced peripheral insulin sensitivity and disorder in insulin
secretion [39], increased
predisposition to obesity [40], metabolic syndrome [41] and increased cardiovascular risk [42]. Despite the occurrence of “catch-up”
growth in 16-wk old LP offspring in the present study, this change was not related
to increasing postnatal food intake when compared to age-matched NP animals.16-wk old LP offspring showed an increased systolic blood pressure from the 9th week
onwards when compared to age-matched NP animals. Several mechanisms may influence
the development of hypertension in adults submitted to protein restriction during
the intrauterine period. Clinical and experimental studies show that low birth
weight due to both intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and maternal
protein-restricted diet, are related to the reduction in the number of nephrons
[24,43]. This kidney change, in turn, may alter
glomerular hyperflow/hyperfiltration. Renal hyperperfusion/hyperfiltration
accelerates glomerulosclerosis that naturally occurs with aging. The early loss of
functional kidney units feeds a vicious cycle that perpetuates itself and determines
the progressive increased renal retention of sodium and water and, consequently,
enhanced arterial blood pressure [12,44]. However,
the mechanisms related to hypertension development due to maternal nutritional
impairment are complex and multifactorial. Although the impairment of nephrogenesis
was associated with the hypertensive framework, fetal overexposure to
glucocorticoids is a crucial component of this process [45]. Furthermore, endothelial dysfunction and
loss of modulatory function performed by the vascular endothelium appear to be
another critical element to the etiology of hypertension [46].Regarding the evaluation of heart LV morphological findings, the current study has
not shown any change in a whole organ or LV weight in both 12-day and 16-wk old LP
offspring. However, the cardiac histological analysis in 16-wk old gestational
protein-restricted rats showed a striking increase in the myocyte cross-sectional
area associated with interstitial collagen expression in the LV. The literature is
controversial about the heart weight of gestational protein-restricted offspring. In
the rodent model, lower heart weight is often reported [10,11]. Otherwise, both higher [47] and equal heart weight
[13,31] have also been reported in rats. These
discrepant results may be related to several factors such as different strains used,
protein-restricted intake levels, a period of hypoprotein diet restriction as well
as differences in postnatal growth and arterial pressure values of LP offspring
[37].Additionally, the present study confirms previous studies showing the higher collagen
content in heart LV in gestational protein-restricted rats compared with age-matched
NP offspring [7,13]. The higher accumulation of
collagen in the LV may compromise the myocardium elasticity and could be associated
with functional cardiac disorders in adulthood [48]. Several authors have suggested that
fibrosis occurs by hemodynamic overload imposed by arterial hypertension
development. Furthermore, higher apoptosis [49] and reduced cardiomyocyte number [10] may explain the
cardiomyocyte hypertrophy accompanied by increased collagen deposition in the left
ventricle in LP offspring.Regarding the miRNAs expression analysis, this work has identified nine miRNAs
differentially expressed in 12-day old LP compared to age-matched NP offspring
(upregulated miRNAs: mir-184, mir-192, mir-376, mir-380-3p, mir-380-5p, mir-451,
mir-582-3p and, downregulated miRNAs: mir-547, mir-743a) and fifteen differentially
expressed miRNAs in 16-wk old LP (upregulated miRNAs: let-7b, mir-125a-3p, mir-182,
mir-188-5p and, downregulated miRNAs: let-7g, mir-107, mir-127, mir-181a, mir-181c,
mir-184, mir-324-5p, mir-383, mir-423-5p, mir-484) compared to age-matched NP rats.
Identification and validation of miRNA targets are of fundamental importance to gain
a comprehensive understanding of miRNA function on modulation of cardiac phenotype
in the present animal model of gestational protein restriction.Analyzing the 12-day LP group, we observed the translation modulation of the
following mRNAs encoding proteins Bbs1, Calml3, Dnmt3a, Oxct1, Rictor and Trps1.
Furthermore, analyzing the 16-wk old LP group, we observed the translation
modulation of the following mRNAs encoding proteins Adrbk1, Bbs1, Dnmt3a, Gpr22,
Inppl1, and Oxct1. Then, to exclude the possible bias due to hypertension in the
LP-16w group, we evaluated the levels of proteins encoded by the genes that had
altered expression in an LP-12d group versus NP-12d group. Thus, we performed
western blot analysis to quantitate the level of Bbs1, Calml3, Dnmt3a, Oxct1, Rictor
and Trps1 proteins. Trps1 protein level was not detected. The LP-12d group had lower
Bbs1 and Calml3 protein levels and higher Dnmt3a and Oxct1 protein levels compared
to the NP-12d group. Rictor protein level was similar in both LP-12d and NP-12d
groups. The lp-16w group had higher Bbs1 and Oxct1 protein levels compared to the
NP-16w group. Calml3, Dnmt3a and Rictor proteins levels did not differ between
LP-16w and NP-16w animals.Thus, it is evident that for some mRNAs targets the result of expression and protein
level analysis was different from that expected by the respective miRNA analysis.
Despite the lower levels of miR-743a, the expression and the protein level of the
predicted target Calml3 gene was surprisingly lower in LP-12d versus NP-12d group.
Similarly, the higher expression and protein level of Dnmt3a in LP-12d versus NP-12d
groups was contrary to the expected higher expression of miR-582-3p. Also, the
higher expression of miR-192 in LP-12d group disagreed with the higher expression
and with the unchanged Rictor protein level in LP-12d versus NP-12d group.
Furthermore, the higher expression of miR-182, the higher expression of the
predicted target Gpr22 gene was surprisingly higher in LP-16w versus NP-16w
group.Several factors may explain this discrepancy between the expected and the obtained
results after the analysis of miRNAs and their predicted targets expression. First,
although not widely applicable, studies have suggested that miRNAs could also act as
positive regulators of transcription [50,51]. Furthermore, it is evident that even the
best available algorithms fail to identify a significant number of miRNA-gene
interactions [52]. miRNA
target prediction currently manages to detect 60% of all available targets and to
provide one valid target in approximately every three predicted targets [53]. Finally, miRNAs integrate
a high complexity network of gene expression regulation, and they have the potential
to regulate a large part of the transcriptome [54]. Thus, each miRNA could regulate the
expression of several mRNAs’ targets, and the expression of each mRNA target could
be potentially regulated by several miRNAs [55]. However, despite these discrepancies, in
both 12-day and 16-week old animals, gestational protein restriction induces
differential miRNAs expression seems to have a modulatory function on the expression
of specific genes that has been associated to cardiac morphology, metabolism, and
function.The Adrbk1 protein, also known as Grk2, under normal conditions, acts together with
β-arrestin to promote the desensitization, internalization and reduce expression of
β-adrenergic receptors after catecholamine stimulus [56]. However, hypertension [57] and heart failure [58] are associated with
increased expression and activity of Grk2, which are initially linked to the
prevention of excessive β-adrenergic stimulation. However, with chronic stimulation,
a vicious cycle begins, and increasingly high levels of Grk2 contribute to heart
failure progression [56].
Furthermore, the Grk2 expression is related to insulin resistance and increased
mitochondrial stress [59,
60]. In fact, LP
offspring have reduced β-adrenergic responsiveness and attenuated adrenergic and
insulin signalling [61].
Thus, higher expression of this gene in 16-week old protein restricted animals could
be related to higher systolic blood pressure, evidenced since the ninth week of
life.The Inppl1 gene encodes a Ship2 protein that acts as a negative regulator of the
insulin signaling pathway, decreasing the insulin sensitivity due to inhibition of
Glut4 translocation [62].
Also, the Ship2 function is related to the inactivation of the PI3K-Akt signaling
pathway [63]. Furthermore,
Ship2 acts directly as docking protein to cytoskeletal proteins, focal adhesion
proteins, and receptors associated with phosphatase and tyrosine kinase proteins
[64,65]. In fact, several authors have been shown
that gestational protein restriction is related to impaired glucose homeostasis,
hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance in adulthood [66,67,68].Bbs1 protein is a structural component of cilia basal body and features a
well-characterized role in the ciliary formation, stability, and function [69]. The bbs1 expression is
related to reduced expression of insulin and leptin receptor plasmatic [70,71]. Furthermore, Bbs1 gene mutation is
associated with higher susceptibility to congenital cardiac defects [72], heart valves and
atrioventricular canal defects, dextrocardia and dilated cardiomyopathy [73].Dnmt3a protein is one component of the DNA methylation epigenetic mechanism and,
together with Dnmt3b and Dnmt3l are responsible for the methylation pattern
establishing genomic DNA during the initial embryogenesis [74]. DNA methylation dynamics are essential
during cardiovascular development as well as in the progression of cardiovascular
disease. Heart failure in mice was associated with altered DNA methylation pattern
that resembles the newborn pattern [75]. In an infarctionrat model, Dnmt3a expression is increased due to
the lower expression of mir-29a and mir-30c, and these changes correlate with
post-ischemic tissue remodeling [76]. Furthermore, increased Dnmt3a expression is associated with lower
RASSF1A expression in cardiac fibroblasts inducing, thereby, cardiac fibrosis [77]. Thus, the higher collagen
accumulation in 16-week old protein restricted animals could be, at least in part,
due to Dnmt3a action.Oxct1 protein is a critical component of the ketone body’s metabolism [78]. Although fatty acids are
the primary energy substrate for myocardium [79], ketone body metabolism is physiologically
crucial during the neonatal period [80]. In new-born rodents, ketogenesis is related to reduced white
adipose tissue and altered availability of substrates after birth, since, during
lactation, the availability of lipids is greater than carbohydrates while in the
intrauterine period, the opposite availability occurs [78,80]. Furthermore, the heart energy demand
increases after birth [78].
Ketone body metabolism is also essential in heart failure [78], and the change in energy substrate after
cardiac injury seems to be a protective role against cardiac injury and ventricular
remodeling [81]. However, the
understanding of the pathophysiology of this metabolic switch as well as the context
in which these changes are adaptive or maladaptive is limited [82]. Hepatic ketogenesis is stimulated, and
plasma levels of ketone bodies increase in a heart failure model proportional to
increase in blood pressure, leading to a reduction in fatty acids oxidation and
increase in ketone body oxidation during the progression of cardiomyopathy [82].Thus, we conclude that all morphological heart alterations that were observed here in
the protein-restricted offspring could be, at least in part, due to changes in
cardiac miRNA expression. Some of the miRNAs differentially expressed in gestational
protein restriction modulate the expression of several genes whose function is
associated with cardiac morphogenesis and morphology by regulating cell polarity,
the cytoskeletal dynamics and intracellular trafficking, cell proliferation, and
growth, extracellular matrix deposition, and apoptosis. Furthermore, some miRNAs
differentially expressed in this experimental model modulate the expression of genes
whose function is associated with cardiac metabolism and function in the
cardiovascular system. Although several studies have determined a close relationship
between abnormal miRNA expression and humancardiac functional disorders, as far as
we know, our study is the first description of changes in miRNA expression caused by
gestational protein restriction that may modulate heart structure in early life and
cause disease onset in later life.
Volcano plot analysis of 12 days and 16 weeks old animals.
(A) MiRNAs volcano plot in LP-12d versus LP-12d groups; (B) MiRNAs volcano
plot in LP-16w versus LP-16w groups. Balls above the red dashed line
indicates the miRNAs differentially expressed between groups.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Western blot gels.
(A) BBS1 blots of 12 days old offspring; (B) BBS1 blots of 16 weeks old
offspring; (C) Calml3 blots of 12 days old offspring; (D) Calml3 blots of 16
weeks old offspring; (E) Dnmt3a blots of 12 days old offspring; (F) Dnmt3a
blots of 16 weeks old offspring; (G) Oxct1 blots of 12 days old offspring;
(H) Oxct1 blots of 16 weeks old offspring; (I) Rictor blots of 12 days old
offspring; (J) Rictor blots of 16 weeks old offspring.(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Primers sequences.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Targets mRNA expression values of NP-12d, LP-12d, NP-16w and LP-16w
groups.
Authors: Eva van Rooij; Lillian B Sutherland; Ning Liu; Andrew H Williams; John McAnally; Robert D Gerard; James A Richardson; Eric N Olson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jessica F Briffa; Andrew J McAinch; Tania Romano; Mary E Wlodek; Deanne H Hryciw Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Anna Rebeka Oliveira Ferreira; Maiara Vanusa Guedes Ribeiro; Maria Natalia Chimirri Peres; Silvano Piovan; Géssica Dutra Gonçalves; Lucas Paulo Jacinto Saavedra; Juliana Nunes de Lima Martins; Marcos Divino Ferreira Junior; Keilah Valeria Naves Cavalcante; Gabriel Kian Guimarães Lopes; Mariane Carneiro; Douglas Lopes Almeida; Rodrigo Mello Gomes; Jurandir Fernando Comar; James Andrew Armitage; Paulo Cezar de Freitas Mathias; Kesia Palma-Rigo Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Laís Vales Mennitti; Asha A M Carpenter; Elena Loche; Lucas C Pantaleão; Denise S Fernandez-Twinn; Josca M Schoonejans; Heather L Blackmore; Thomas J Ashmore; Luciana Pellegrini Pisani; John A Tadross; Iain Hargreaves; Susan E Ozanne Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 5.095