OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of postnatal catch-up growth from birth to two years and its relation to size and obesity at five years. DESIGN: Regional prospective cohort study. SETTING: Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 848 full term singletons from a 10% random sample of the Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal birth weight, prepregnancy weight, pregnancy weight gain, height, smoking, and parity, and paternal height. Weight and length of infants at birth, two years, and five years expressed as standard deviation (SD) scores from the UK reference scores for 1990. Percentage fat mass and total fat mass (estimated from skinfolds) and waist circumference at five years. RESULTS: Size at birth was representative of the national reference. Overall, 30. 7% (260 of 848) of infants showed a gain in SD score for weight greater than 0.67 SD scores between zero and two years, indicating clinically significant catch-up growth. These children had lower weight, length, and ponderal index at birth than other children, and were more often from primiparous pregnancies. They also had taller fathers than other children, and their mothers had lower birth weights and were more likely to smoke during pregnancy. Children who showed catch-up growth between zero and two years were heavier, taller, and fatter (body mass index, percentage body fat, and waist circumference) at five years than other children. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary well nourished cohort, catch-up growth was predicted by factors relating to intrauterine restraint of fetal growth. Children who showed catch-up growth between zero and two years were fatter and had more central fat distribution at five years than other children. Mechanisms that signal and regulate early catch-up growth in the postnatal period may influence associations between small size at birth and risks for disease in adulthood.
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of postnatal catch-up growth from birth to two years and its relation to size and obesity at five years. DESIGN: Regional prospective cohort study. SETTING: Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: 848 full term singletons from a 10% random sample of the Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal birth weight, prepregnancy weight, pregnancy weight gain, height, smoking, and parity, and paternal height. Weight and length of infants at birth, two years, and five years expressed as standard deviation (SD) scores from the UK reference scores for 1990. Percentage fat mass and total fat mass (estimated from skinfolds) and waist circumference at five years. RESULTS: Size at birth was representative of the national reference. Overall, 30. 7% (260 of 848) of infants showed a gain in SD score for weight greater than 0.67 SD scores between zero and two years, indicating clinically significant catch-up growth. These children had lower weight, length, and ponderal index at birth than other children, and were more often from primiparous pregnancies. They also had taller fathers than other children, and their mothers had lower birth weights and were more likely to smoke during pregnancy. Children who showed catch-up growth between zero and two years were heavier, taller, and fatter (body mass index, percentage body fat, and waist circumference) at five years than other children. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary well nourished cohort, catch-up growth was predicted by factors relating to intrauterine restraint of fetal growth. Children who showed catch-up growth between zero and two years were fatter and had more central fat distribution at five years than other children. Mechanisms that signal and regulate early catch-up growth in the postnatal period may influence associations between small size at birth and risks for disease in adulthood.
Authors: Ian M Paul; Jennifer S Savage; Stephanie L Anzman; Jessica S Beiler; Michele E Marini; Jennifer L Stokes; Leann L Birch Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Maria Aurora Chrestani; Iná S Santos; Bernardo L Horta; Samuel C Dumith; Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira Dode Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2013-04
Authors: Erynn M Bergner; Roman Shypailo; Chonnikant Visuthranukul; Joseph Hagan; Andrea R O'Donnell; Keli M Hawthorne; Steven A Abrams; Amy B Hair Journal: Breastfeed Med Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Kaarin Mäkikallio; Jyotsna Shah; Cameron Slorach; Hong Qin; John Kingdom; Sarah Keating; Ed Kelly; Cedric Manlhiot; Andrew Redington; Edgar Jaeggi Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Anders Bergström; Thomas Hjort Skov; Martin Iain Bahl; Henrik Munch Roager; Line Brinch Christensen; Katrine Tschentscher Ejlerskov; Christian Mølgaard; Kim F Michaelsen; Tine Rask Licht Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 4.792