Literature DB >> 31028380

Evaluation of net protein contribution, methane production, and net returns from beef production as duration of confinement increases in the cow-calf sector1.

Jessica R Baber1, Jason E Sawyer1, Tryon A Wickersham1.   

Abstract

Intensification of cow-calf production may provide a sustainable solution for meeting increasing beef demand in the face of diminishing resources. However, intensification with its greater reliance on cereal grains potentially decreases the upcycling of human-inedible protein into beef. A previously described model was used to evaluate cow-calf intensification on beef's ability to meet human protein requirements. Four scenarios were compared, based on a 1,000 cow herd: 1) Conventional cow-calf production system (0CON), 2) cows limit-fed in confinement for 4 mo after weaning (4CON), 3) cows limit-fed in confinement for 8 mo after breeding (8CON), or 4) cows limit-fed in confinement year-round (12CON). Changes were not made to either the stocker or feedlot segments of the beef value chain. Net protein contribution (NPC) was calculated by multiplying the ratio of human-edible protein (HeP) in beef produced to HeP in feed by the protein quality ratio. A NPC >1 indicates that the production system is positively contributing to meeting human requirements, whereas a NPC <1 indicates the sector or value chain is competing with humans for HeP. Methane was estimated based on proportion of forage in diet and total methane production was reported per kg HeP. In the cow-calf sector, HeP conversion efficiency (HePCE) decreased from 2,640.83 to 0.37 while methane production decreased from 4.53 to 1.82 kg/kg HeP produced as the length of intensification increased from 0CON to 12CON. Decreased HePCE resulted in NPC values for cow-calf sector of 8,036.80, 4.93, 2.19, and 1.28 for 0CON, 4CON, 8CON, and 12CON, respectively. Protein quality ratio of the entire beef value chain increased from 3.15 to 3.33, while HePCE decreased from 0.99 to 0.39 as length of intensification increased from 0CON to 12CON. For the beef value chain, NPC was 3.11, 2.30, 1.73, and 1.31 for 0CON, 4CON, 8CON, and 12CON, respectively. Across the value chain, confinement of cows for 12 mo decreased enteric methane from 3.05 to 1.53 kg/kg HeP (0CON and 12CON, respectfully). Additionally, profitability of the cow-calf operation decreased from $249.34 to $102.16 per cow as intensification increased. Of confinement scenarios, probability of loss to an operation was least (4%) for 4CON. Feed costs increased by $260.79 per cow for 0CON when drought conditions existed (0COND). Total methane production was reduced by intensification and none of the scenarios evaluated competed with humans for HeP.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cow–calf; human-edible protein; intensification; methane; net protein contribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31028380      PMCID: PMC6606500          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. Report of an FAQ Expert Consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  FAO Food Nutr Pap       Date:  2013

2.  Red meat production in australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies.

Authors:  Gregory M Peters; Hazel V Rowley; Stephen Wiedemann; Robyn Tucker; Michael D Short; Matthias Schulz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply.

Authors:  P Ertl; W Knaus; W Zollitsch
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007.

Authors:  J L Capper
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock.

Authors:  J M Wilkinson
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Review: Use of human-edible animal feeds by ruminant livestock.

Authors:  J M Wilkinson; M R F Lee
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.

Authors:  K R Stackhouse-Lawson; C A Rotz; J W Oltjen; F M Mitloehner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Is the Grass Always Greener? Comparing the Environmental Impact of Conventional, Natural and Grass-Fed Beef Production Systems.

Authors:  Judith L Capper
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin-A Review.

Authors:  Gerhard Flachowsky; Ulrich Meyer; Karl-Heinz Südekum
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.