Literature DB >> 27160573

An approach to including protein quality when assessing the net contribution of livestock to human food supply.

P Ertl1, W Knaus1, W Zollitsch1.   

Abstract

The production of protein from animal sources is often criticized because of the low efficiency of converting plant protein from feeds into protein in the animal products. However, this critique does not consider the fact that large portions of the plant-based proteins fed to animals may be human-inedible and that the quality of animal proteins is usually superior as compared with plant proteins. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess changes in protein quality in the course of the transformation of potentially human-edible plant proteins into animal products via livestock production; data from 30 Austrian dairy farms were used as a case study. A second aim was to develop an approach for combining these changes with quantitative aspects (e.g. with the human-edible feed conversion efficiency (heFCE), defined as kilogram protein in the animal product divided by kilogram potentially human-edible protein in the feeds). Protein quality of potentially human-edible inputs and outputs was assessed using the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score and the digestible indispensable amino acid score, two methods proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to describe the nutritional value of proteins for humans. Depending on the method used, protein scores were between 1.40 and 1.87 times higher for the animal products than for the potentially human-edible plant protein input on a barn-gate level (=protein quality ratio (PQR)). Combining the PQR of 1.87 with the heFCE for the same farms resulted in heFCE×PQR of 2.15. Thus, considering both quantity and quality, the value of the proteins in the animal products for human consumption (in this case in milk and beef) is 2.15 times higher than that of proteins in the potentially human-edible plant protein inputs. The results of this study emphasize the necessity of including protein quality changes resulting from the transformation of plant proteins to animal proteins when evaluating the net contribution of livestock to the human food supply. Furthermore, these differences in protein quality might also need to be considered when choosing a functional unit for the assessment of environmental impacts of the production of different proteins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cow; feed; food security; functional unit; protein quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160573     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116000902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

1.  A catalog of microbial genes from the bovine rumen unveils a specialized and diverse biomass-degrading environment.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Huanzi Zhong; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Nicolas Terrapon; Vincent Lombard; Gabrielle Potocki-Veronese; Jordi Estellé; Milka Popova; Ziyi Yang; Hui Zhang; Fang Li; Shanmei Tang; Fangming Yang; Weineng Chen; Bing Chen; Jiyang Li; Jing Guo; Cécile Martin; Emmanuelle Maguin; Xun Xu; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Lise Madsen; Karsten Kristiansen; Bernard Henrissat; Stanislav D Ehrlich; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  Evaluation of net protein contribution, methane production, and net returns from beef production as duration of confinement increases in the cow-calf sector1.

Authors:  Jessica R Baber; Jason E Sawyer; Tryon A Wickersham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin-A Review.

Authors:  Gerhard Flachowsky; Ulrich Meyer; Karl-Heinz Südekum
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Protein intake adequacy among Nigerian infants, children, adolescents and women and protein quality of commonly consumed foods.

Authors:  Judith de Vries-Ten Have; Adedotun Owolabi; Jan Steijns; Urszula Kudla; Alida Melse-Boonstra
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 7.800

Review 5.  Food-First Approach to Enhance the Regulation of Post-exercise Skeletal Muscle Protein Synthesis and Remodeling.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Joseph W Beals; Isabel G Martinez; Amadeo F Salvador; Sarah K Skinner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  How Healthy Are Non-Traditional Dietary Proteins? The Effect of Diverse Protein Foods on Biomarkers of Human Health.

Authors:  Caroline Bull; Damien Belobrajdic; Sara Hamzelou; Darren Jones; Wayne Leifert; Rocío Ponce-Reyes; Netsanet Shiferaw Terefe; Gemma Williams; Michelle Colgrave
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-02-11

7.  Nutrient provision capacity of alternative livestock farming systems per area of arable farmland required.

Authors:  M R F Lee; J P Domingues; G A McAuliffe; M Tichit; F Accatino; T Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Improvement of Oxidative Status, Milk and Cheese Production, and Food Sustainability Indexes by Addition of Durum Wheat Bran to Dairy Cows' Diet.

Authors:  Adriana Bonanno; Antonino Di Grigoli; Massimo Todaro; Marco Alabiso; Francesca Vitale; Adriana Di Trana; Daniela Giorgio; Luca Settanni; Raimondo Gaglio; Barbara Laddomada; Giuseppe Di Miceli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  A Comparison of Dietary Protein Digestibility, Based on DIAAS Scoring, in Vegetarian and Non-Vegetarian Athletes.

Authors:  Corinne Ciuris; Heidi M Lynch; Christopher Wharton; Carol S Johnston
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: Nutritional Value of Plant Proteins and Their Potential Contribution to Human Health.

Authors:  Robert W Davies; Philip M Jakeman
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.