Literature DB >> 20067280

Red meat production in australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies.

Gregory M Peters1, Hazel V Rowley, Stephen Wiedemann, Robyn Tucker, Michael D Short, Matthias Schulz.   

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions from beef production are a significant part of Australia's total contribution to climate change. For the first time an environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) hybridizing detailed on-site process modeling and input-output analysis is used to describe Australian red meat production. In this paper we report the carbon footprint and total energy consumption of three supply chains in three different regions in Australia over two years. The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy use data are compared to those from international studies on red meat production, and the Australian results are either average or below average. The increasing proportion of lot-fed beef in Australia is favorable, since this production system generates lower total GHG emissions than grass-fed production; the additional effort in producing and transporting feeds is effectively offset by the increased efficiency of meat production in feedlots. In addition to these two common LCA indicators, in this paper we also quantify solid waste generation and a soil erosion indicator on a common basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20067280     DOI: 10.1021/es901131e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of net protein contribution, methane production, and net returns from beef production as duration of confinement increases in the cow-calf sector1.

Authors:  Jessica R Baber; Jason E Sawyer; Tryon A Wickersham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Calf- and Yearling-Fed Beef Production Systems, With and Without the Use of Growth Promotants.

Authors:  John Basarab; Vern Baron; Óscar López-Campos; Jennifer Aalhus; Karen Haugen-Kozyra; Erasmus Okine
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Is the Grass Always Greener? Comparing the Environmental Impact of Conventional, Natural and Grass-Fed Beef Production Systems.

Authors:  Judith L Capper
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Carbon Footprints for Food of Animal Origin: What are the Most Preferable Criteria to Measure Animal Yields?

Authors:  Gerhard Flachowsky; Josef Kamphues
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The Influence of Climate, Soil and Pasture Type on Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity of Modeled Beef Cow-Calf Grazing Systems in Southern Australia.

Authors:  Matthew J Bell; Brendan R Cullen; Richard J Eckard
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Are the dietary guidelines for meat, fat, fruit and vegetable consumption appropriate for environmental sustainability? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian John Reynolds; Jonathan David Buckley; Philip Weinstein; John Boland
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin-A Review.

Authors:  Gerhard Flachowsky; Ulrich Meyer; Karl-Heinz Südekum
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Understanding the Political Challenge of Red and Processed Meat Reduction for Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Katherine Sievert; Mark Lawrence; Christine Parker; Phillip Baker
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-12-01

9.  Distributions of emissions intensity for individual beef cattle reared on pasture-based production systems.

Authors:  G A McAuliffe; T Takahashi; R J Orr; P Harris; M R F Lee
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 9.297

Review 10.  Voisin Rational Grazing as a Sustainable Alternative for Livestock Production.

Authors:  Luiz C Pinheiro Machado Filho; Hizumi L S Seó; Ruan R Daros; Daniel Enriquez-Hidalgo; Adenor V Wendling; Luiz C Pinheiro Machado
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.