Literature DB >> 31028286

Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection.

Thomas Kohnen1, Myriam Böhm2, Eva Hemkeppler2, Sabrina Schönbrunn2, Nina DeLorenzo2, Kerstin Petermann2, Michael Herzog2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual performance of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) for patient selection.
METHODS: This prospective non-comparative case series evaluated fifty-two eyes (26 patients) after bilateral implantation of the Tecnis Symfony IOL. Exclusion criteria were previous ocular surgeries, corneal astigmatism of >1.5 diopter, and ocular pathologies or corneal abnormalities. Uncorrected (UCVA) and distance-corrected (DCVA) visual acuity (VA) in 4 m, 80 cm, 60 cm and 40 cm (logMAR), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (CS) and a questionnaire on subjective quality of vision (QoV) were assessed after 3 months.
RESULTS: UCVA was -0.02 ± 0.071 logMAR at 4 m, 0.01 ± 0.077 logMAR at 80 cm, 0.08 ± 0.187 logMAR at 60 cm and 0.22 ± 0.153 logMAR at 40 cm. Defocus curve testing showed a flat VA range from 0.00 to -1.50 D (-0.05-0.02 logMAR). At near distance from -2.0 to -2.5 D a dip of DCVA was observed (0.14-0.28 logMAR). CS under photopic and mesopic conditions without and with glare was 1.56 logCS, 0.86 logCS, 0.78 logCS, respectively. Spectacle independence was achieved in 100% for distance and intermediate vision and 71% of patients at near distance.
CONCLUSION: This EDOF IOL provides excellent intermediate and far (<0.1 logMAR) and acceptable near UCVA (<0.3 logMAR). Defocus curve testing confirmed an EDOF between far and intermediate distance and showed a dip at near distance. It provides good QoV, CS, high spectacle independence, perception of few optical phenomena, and particularly good night-driving capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31028286      PMCID: PMC7002424          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0443-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  33 in total

1.  Visual performance after bilateral implantation of 2 new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: Trifocal versus extended range of vision.

Authors:  Gaspare Monaco; Mariangela Gari; Fabio Di Censo; Andrea Poscia; Giada Ruggi; Antonio Scialdone
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes With a Monofocal and an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Enrico Bruni; Erika Bonacci; Rosanna Badalamenti; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ramón Ruiz-Mesa; Antonio Abengózar-Vela; María Ruiz-Santos
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Visual Performance of a Quadrifocal (Trifocal) Intraocular Lens Following Removal of the Crystalline Lens.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Michael Herzog; Eva Hemkeppler; Sabrina Schönbrunn; Nina De Lorenzo; Kerstin Petermann; Myriam Böhm
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after presbyopic lens exchange with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  John S M Chang; Jack C M Ng; Silvania Y F Lau
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Ramón Ruiz-Mesa; Antonio Abengózar-Vela; Ana Aramburu; María Ruiz-Santos
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Clinical outcomes with a new trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Law; Rajesh K Aggarwal; Hosam Kasaby
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Javier Mendicute; Alexander Kapp; Pierre Lévy; Gero Krommes; Alfonso Arias-Puente; Mark Tomalla; Elena Barraquer; Pascal Rozot; Pierre Bouchut
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Clinical Evaluation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens With the Salzburg Reading Desk.

Authors:  Mary S A Attia; Gerd U Auffarth; Florian T A Kretz; Tamer Tandogan; Tanja M Rabsilber; Mike P Holzer; Ramin Khoramnia
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes following Bilateral Implantation of Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens with Micromonovision.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Archana Pawar; Kirti J Relekar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.909

View more
  10 in total

1.  Difference in Quality of Vision Outcome among Extended Depth of Focus, Bifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Chen-Cheng Chao; Hung-Yuan Lin; Chia-Yi Lee; Elsa Lin-Chin Mai; Ie-Bin Lian; Chao-Kai Chang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  Visual Acuity, Defocus Curve, Reading Speed and Patient Satisfaction with a Combined Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Multifocal Intraocular Lens Modality.

Authors:  Helga P Sandoval; Richard Potvin; Kerry D Solomon
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  A Comparative Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Robert Edward Ang; Gian Carlo S Picache; Mark Christian R Rivera; Lord Ryan L Lopez; Emerson M Cruz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  Clinical Performance of Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses - A Retrospective Comparative Study of Mini Well Ready and Symfony.

Authors:  Katarzyna Ewa Nowik; Kamil Nowik; Piotr Kanclerz; Jacek Paweł Szaflik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-26

5.  Comparing Visual Acuity, Low Contrast Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity After Trifocal Toric and Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Kjell G Gundersen; Rick Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-22

6.  Visual Acuity, Quality of Vision, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation with a Trifocal or Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Dan B Tran; Ashley Owyang; Jin Hwang; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-03

7.  Clinical Outcomes after Mix-and-Match Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus and Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Jae Hyuck Lee; Ho Seok Chung; Su Young Moon; So Young Park; Hun Lee; Jae Yong Kim; Hungwon Tchah
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Clinical outcomes with a low add multifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lenses both implanted with mini-monovision.

Authors:  Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Semra Akkaya Turhan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study.

Authors:  Yuka Ota; Keiichiro Minami; Shinichi Oki; Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Keiichiro Okamoto; Masaya Nakashima; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Multicountry clinical outcomes of a new nondiffractive presbyopia-correcting IOL.

Authors:  Chandra Bala; Francisco Poyales; Mercè Guarro; Ramón Ruiz Mesa; Ali Mearza; Devesh Kumar Varma; Srichand Jasti; Jessie Lemp-Hull
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.351

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.