Literature DB >> 28991333

Clinical Evaluation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens With the Salzburg Reading Desk.

Mary S A Attia, Gerd U Auffarth, Florian T A Kretz, Tamer Tandogan, Tanja M Rabsilber, Mike P Holzer, Ramin Khoramnia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) regarding visual performance at various distances, reading performance on an electronic reading desk, and depth of focus on the defocus curve.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 30 eyes of 15 patients who received the Tecnis Symfony IOL (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA) were examined 3.60 ± 1.54 months postoperatively. Uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA and CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate (UIVA and DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuity were determined. The defocus curve was performed with distance correction. Furthermore, the reading acuity at the preferred near and intermediate distances was measured with consideration of the reading distance, speed, and print size. A subjective questionnaire was also administered.
RESULTS: Results showed a median UDVA of 0.03 logMAR or 20/21.43 Snellen (range: 0.44 to -0.18 logMAR or 20/55.08 to 20/13.21 Snellen), UNVA of 0.20 logMAR or 20/31.70 Snellen (range: 0.46 to 0.00 logMAR or 20/57.68 to 20/20 Snellen), and UIVA of -0.03 logMAR or 20/18.67 Snellen (range: 0.14 to -0.18 logMAR or 20/27.61 to 20/13.21 Snellen). The improved performance at intermediate distance was confirmed by an uncorrected reading acuity of 0.09 logMAR or 20/24.61 Snellen (range: 0.36 to 0.00 logMAR or 20/45.82 to 20/20.00 Snellen) at a preferred intermediate distance of 64.10 cm (range: 52.0 to 75.0 cm). The defocus curve showed an extended range of visual acuity of 0.10 logMAR or better between 1.00 and -1.50 diopters.
CONCLUSIONS: The EDOF IOL design provided a wide range of improved visual and reading function between far and intermediate distances and also improved near visual acuity. Patients reported a high rate of satisfaction and spectacle independence at the various distances. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(10):664-669.]. Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28991333     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  16 in total

1.  Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Myriam Böhm; Eva Hemkeppler; Sabrina Schönbrunn; Nina DeLorenzo; Kerstin Petermann; Michael Herzog
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  A Comparative Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Three Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Robert Edward Ang; Gian Carlo S Picache; Mark Christian R Rivera; Lord Ryan L Lopez; Emerson M Cruz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-20

3.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Implantation of Monofocal IOL in One Eye and ERV IOL in the Contralateral Eye with Mini-Monovision.

Authors:  Sheetal Brar; Sri Ganesh; Raghavender Reddy Arra; Smith Snehal Sute
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-04

4.  Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction.

Authors:  Santiago Escandón-García; Filomena J Ribeiro; Colm McAlinden; António Queirós; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Performance of a New-Generation Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens-A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Madhivanan Nivean; Pratheeba Devi Nivean; Jagadeesh Kumar Reddy; Kavithaa Ramamoorthy; Nishanth Madhivanan; Mohan Rajan; Sabyasachi Sengupta
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

6.  Optimum Refractive Target in Patients with Bilateral Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Mitchell A Jackson; Anna M Edmiston; Raman Bedi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-18

7.  Clinical outcomes with a low add multifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lenses both implanted with mini-monovision.

Authors:  Mehmet Orkun Sevik; Semra Akkaya Turhan; Ebru Toker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.456

8.  Rotational stability and visual performance 3 months after bilateral implantation of a new toric extended range of vision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18

9.  Monocular Clinical Outcomes and Range of Near Vision following Cataract Surgery with Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Rahul T Pandit
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Clinical outcomes after mix-and-match implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with + 2.75 and + 4.00 diopter add powers.

Authors:  Jae Hyuck Lee; Hun Lee; Jin Ah Lee; Aeri Yoo; Jae Yong Kim; Hungwon Tchah
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.