Literature DB >> 31019766

A comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition and two-dimensional high-definition video systems in totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement.

Xin Zang1, Huan-Lei Huang1, Bin Xie1, Jian Liu1, Hui-Ming Guo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional vision with improved depth perception and spatial orientation has already proved its superiority to the two-dimensional vision in endoscopic surgery. However, those benefits remain unidentified in cardiac surgery. For the first time, we compare performance of a three-dimensional high-definition video system with a two-dimensional high-definition video system in patients undergoing totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement.
METHODS: We enrolled 90 patients with mitral valve disease in a single institution, from June 2013 to June 2016. Totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement was performed by the same surgeon using either a three-dimensional high-definition (n=43) or a two-dimensional high-definition (n=47) video system with the same surgical technique. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. All medical records were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database of minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
RESULTS: All surgeries were successfully completed under totally endoscopic guidance. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. The use of three-dimensional video system reduced aortic cross-clamp time by approximately 10% (3D vs. 2D: 65.74±14.32 vs. 72.67±14.67 min, P=0.027). No significant differences were observed in cardiopulmonary bypass time, postoperative ventilation duration, length of surgical intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, and major complications between the two groups. There were no perioperative deaths in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the two-dimensional video system, the three-dimensional high-definition video system provided a better surgical experience with the same operative safety for totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imagine; minimally invasive surgery; mitral valve; surgery, thoracoscopic; three-dimensional (3D)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31019766      PMCID: PMC6462732          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  16 in total

1.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance.

Authors:  V Falk; D Mintz; J Grünenfelder; J I Fann; T A Burdon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery?

Authors:  Greta McLachlan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Jens Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Technical challenges in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  J Bonatti; T Schachner; N Bonaros; A Ohlinger; M Danzmayr; P Jonetzko; G Friedrich; C Kolbitsch; P Mair; G Laufer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Early adoption of robotic pulmonary lobectomy: feasibility and initial outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel S Oh; Isaac Cho; Brian Karamian; Steven R DeMeester; Jeffrey A Hagen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.

Authors:  D Wilhelm; S Reiser; N Kohn; M Witte; U Leiner; L Mühlbach; D Ruschin; W Reiner; H Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems †.

Authors:  Patrick Bagan; Florence De Dominicis; Jacques Hernigou; Bassel Dakhil; Rym Zaimi; Ciprian Pricopi; Françoise Le Pimpec Barthes; Pascal Berna
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-03

8.  2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set.

Authors:  Youssef S Tanagho; Gerald L Andriole; Alethea G Paradis; Kerry M Madison; Gurdarshan S Sandhu; J Esteban Varela; Brian M Benway
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Zhao Li; Jing-Pei Li; Xiong Qin; Bin-Bin Xu; Yu-Dong Han; Si-Da Liu; Wen-Zhuo Zhu; Ming-Zheng Peng; Qiang Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  [A comparative study of Da Vinci robot system with video-assisted thoracoscopy in the surgical treatment of mediastinal lesions].

Authors:  Renquan Ding; Xiangdong Tong; Shiguang Xu; Dakun Zhang; Xin Gao; Hong Teng; Jiaqi Qu; Shumin Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2014-07-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Propensity-matched analysis of two port approach versus three port approach for totally thoracoscopic mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Peijian Wei; Jiexu Ma; Liangzheng Fang; Zhao Chen; Zhongming Cao; Fangzhou Liu; Yanjun Liu; Tong Tan; Hongxiang Wu; Huanlei Huang; Jimei Chen; Jian Zhuang; Bin Xie; Huiming Guo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  [Comparison of quality of life and long-term outcomes following mitral valve replacement through robotically assisted versus median sternotomy approach].

Authors:  Haizhi Zhao; Huajun Zhang; Ming Yang; Cangsong Xiao; Yao Wang; Changqing Gao; Rong Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.