Literature DB >> 16399306

Technical challenges in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting.

J Bonatti1, T Schachner, N Bonaros, A Ohlinger, M Danzmayr, P Jonetzko, G Friedrich, C Kolbitsch, P Mair, G Laufer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Robotic technology is a prerequisite for performance of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. During the implementation phase of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, surgeon-related technical difficulties might be encountered. It was the aim of this study to assess the incidence of these challenges, to find risk factors, and to describe clinical results associated with technical errors.
METHODS: From October 2001 through October 2004, 40 patients received robotically assisted totally endoscopic left internal thoracic artery grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery system with the da Vinci telemanipulation device. All patients underwent remote access cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion through groin access, and all anastomoses were performed on the arrested heart.
RESULTS: Undesirable technical events of various grades occurred in 20 (50%) of 40 patients: bleeding from a port hole in 3 (8%), left internal thoracic artery damage in 3 (8%), epicardial lesion in 3 (8%), remote access perfusion problems in 9 (23%), bleeding from the anastomosis in 4 (10%), and anastomotic stenosis in 2 (5%). There was no hospital mortality. The following differences were noted between patients without technical difficulties (group 1) and those in whom problems occurred (group 2): total operative time of 314 minutes (260-540 minutes) versus 418 minutes (270-690 minutes; P = .007), ventilation time of 6 hours (0-26 hours) versus 14 hours (0-278 hours; P = .004), intensive care unit stay of 20 hours (11-70 hours) versus 44 hours (16-336 hours; P=.183), hospital stay of 7 days (4-13 days) versus 8 days (5-21 days; P = .038), and cumulative freedom from angina at 36 months of 93% versus 100% (P = .317).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that technical difficulties during totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting translate into markedly increased operative time, moderately prolonged postoperative ventilation time, and slightly increased hospital stay. Short-term survival and freedom from angina, however, do not seem to be compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16399306     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  8 in total

1.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Zhe Zheng; John H Alexander; Judson B Williams; Ying Xian; Michael E Halkos; J Matthew Brennan; Robbert J de Winter; Peter K Smith; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Is totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass safe, feasible and effective?

Authors:  Metesh Nalin Acharya; Hutan Ashrafian; Thanos Athanasiou; Roberto Casula
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-09-12

4.  Systematic review of robotic-assisted, totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Michael Seco; J James B Edelman; Tristan D Yan; Michael K Wilson; Paul G Bannon; Michael P Vallely
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

5.  A comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition and two-dimensional high-definition video systems in totally endoscopic mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Xin Zang; Huan-Lei Huang; Bin Xie; Jian Liu; Hui-Ming Guo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Do manual assisting maneuvers increase speed and technical performance in robotically sutured coronary bypass graft anastomoses?

Authors:  J Bonatti; J Alfadlhi; T Schachner; N Bonaros; E Rützler; G Laufer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Minimally invasive approaches versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Bang; Jong Wook Kim; Jae Won Lee; Joon Bum Kim; Sung-Ho Jung; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-04-03

8.  Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft-First and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-First Approaches for 2-Stage Hybrid Coronary Revascularization.

Authors:  Hang Jun Choi; Joonkyu Kang; Hyun Song; Do Yeon Kim; Kuk Bin Choi
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.