V Falk1, D Mintz, J Grünenfelder, J I Fann, T A Burdon. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. falv@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Different viewing conditions (two- and three-dimensional National Television Standard Committee [2D-NTSC and 3D-NTSC] and two-dimensional high-definition television [2D-HDTV]) on telemanipulator performance were evaluated. METHODS: Six taskes were performed by 15 endoscopic surgeons using the daVinci telemanipulation system. Performance time and errors were measured. Encoder data from the system were used for kinematic analysis of motion. A self-evaluation questionnaire regarding performance under various viewing conditions was obtained. RESULTS: Resolution was better with 2D-HDTV. The estimate of relative distance was not influenced by the different visualization systems. Motor skill tasks were performed faster with binocular vision (3D-NTSC) than with monocular vision (2D-NTSC, 2D-HDTV). For both 2D settings, the deceleration phase of motion was prolonged (p < 0.05 vs 3D). Peak velocity was reduced with 2D-HDTV as compared with 3D-NTSC (p = 0.01). The surgeons tended to favor the 3D system despite their use of 2D systems in their own practice. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional vision enhances telemanipulator performance as compared with a 2D system at the same or higher level of resolution. Because it allows faster and more precise movement, future surgical systems should focus on 3D visualization.
BACKGROUND: Different viewing conditions (two- and three-dimensional National Television Standard Committee [2D-NTSC and 3D-NTSC] and two-dimensional high-definition television [2D-HDTV]) on telemanipulator performance were evaluated. METHODS: Six taskes were performed by 15 endoscopic surgeons using the daVinci telemanipulation system. Performance time and errors were measured. Encoder data from the system were used for kinematic analysis of motion. A self-evaluation questionnaire regarding performance under various viewing conditions was obtained. RESULTS: Resolution was better with 2D-HDTV. The estimate of relative distance was not influenced by the different visualization systems. Motor skill tasks were performed faster with binocular vision (3D-NTSC) than with monocular vision (2D-NTSC, 2D-HDTV). For both 2D settings, the deceleration phase of motion was prolonged (p < 0.05 vs 3D). Peak velocity was reduced with 2D-HDTV as compared with 3D-NTSC (p = 0.01). The surgeons tended to favor the 3D system despite their use of 2D systems in their own practice. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional vision enhances telemanipulator performance as compared with a 2D system at the same or higher level of resolution. Because it allows faster and more precise movement, future surgical systems should focus on 3D visualization.
Authors: J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2004-02-02 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Andrew V Poliakov; Evan Albright; Kevin P Hinshaw; David P Corina; George Ojemann; Richard F Martin; James F Brinkley Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-11-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Fokko P Wieringa; Henri Bouma; Pieter T Eendebak; Jean-Paul A van Basten; Harrie P Beerlage; Geert A H J Smits; Jelte E Bos Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2014-05-16