Literature DB >> 22721451

Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.

Patrick Honeck1, Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Jens Rassweiler, Thomas Knoll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conventional two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy has been limited by the lack of depth perception and spatial orientation. This disadvantage may affect surgical performance, operative time, or morbidity. Depth perception, spatial resolution, and accuracy may be improved by three-dimensional (3D) vision. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of 3D imaging on the performance of novice and experienced laparoscopic surgeons executing standardized laparoscopic tasks in an ex-vivo setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D imaging system with a digital 3D full high definition (HD) and a 2D imaging with a conventional HDTV camera were used. A total of 10 laparoscopic experts and 10 novices were evaluated while performing standardized skill tasks in a pelvic trainer. Participants were divided into two groups working either with 2D or 3D imaging. The parameters measured were time until completion of each skill and total procedure time, number of losses of working material, number of missed grasps, and number of needed support. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test.
RESULTS: The results showed a significant difference in favor of the 3D system for the amount of missed grasps in the experts as well as the novice group (P<0.0001). A slightly significant difference was also seen for the loss of working materials (P=0.0381 and P=0.0693). The study is limited by its small sample size.
CONCLUSION: The 3D imaging system significantly improves spatial orientation and depth perception during laparoscopy under ex-vivo conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22721451     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  25 in total

1.  Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.

Authors:  Young Suk Park; Aung Myint Oo; Sang-Yong Son; Dong Joon Shin; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Mona Meral Savran; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Vimalraj Velayutham; David Fuks; Takeo Nomi; Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Nereo Vettoretto; Nader K Francis; Marco Augusto Bonino; Nathan J Curtis; Daniele Amparore; Simone Arolfo; Manuel Barberio; Luigi Boni; Ronit Brodie; Nicole Bouvy; Elisa Cassinotti; Thomas Carus; Enrico Checcucci; Petra Custers; Michele Diana; Marilou Jansen; Joris Jaspers; Gadi Marom; Kota Momose; Beat P Müller-Stich; Kyokazu Nakajima; Felix Nickel; Silvana Perretta; Francesco Porpiglia; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Marlies Schijven; Gianfranco Silecchia; Roberto Passera; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  What Are the Advantages of 3D Cameras in Gynaecological Laparoscopy?

Authors:  S Baum; M Sillem; J T Ney; A Baum; M Friedrich; J Radosa; K M Kramer; B Gronwald; S Gottschling; E F Solomayer; A Rody; R Joukhadar
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Evaluation of a novel multi-articulated endoscope: proof of concept through a virtual simulation.

Authors:  Tuukka Karvonen; Yusuke Muranishi; Goshiro Yamamoto; Tomohiro Kuroda; Toshihiko Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy.

Authors:  B Alaraimi; W El Bakbak; S Sarker; S Makkiyah; A Al-Marzouq; R Goriparthi; A Bouhelal; V Quan; B Patel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical skill performance in a laparoscopic test model for both experienced and novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Roy Mashiach; Vadym Mezhybovsky; Avinoam Nevler; Mordechai Gutman; Amitai Ziv; Marat Khaikin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Fevzi Shakir; Haider Jan; Andrew Kent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A comparative analysis of lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy via three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus two-dimensional resection.

Authors:  Chengliang Yang; Lili Mo; Yegang Ma; Guilin Peng; Yi Ren; Wei Wang; Yongyu Liu; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.