Literature DB >> 31017621

Evaluation of Force Sensing Resistors for the Measurement of Interface Pressures in Lower Limb Prosthetics.

Eric Swanson1, Ethan Weathersby1, John Cagle1, Joan E Sanders1.   

Abstract

Understanding pressure distributions at the limb-socket interface is essential to the design and evaluation of prosthetic components for lower limb prosthesis users. Force sensing resistors (FSRs) are employed in prosthetics research to measure pressure at this interface due to their low cost, thin profile, and ease of use. While FSRs are known to be sensitive to many sources of error, few studies have systematically quantified these errors using test conditions relevant to lower limb prosthetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate FSR accuracy for the measurement of lower limb prosthetics interface pressures. Two FSR models (Flexiforce A201 and Interlink 402) were subjected to a series of prosthetic-relevant tests. These tests included: (1) static compression, (2) cyclic compression, and (3) a combined static and cyclic compression protocol mimicking a variable activity (Walk-Sit-Stand) procedure. Flexiforce sensors outperformed Interlink sensors and were then subjected to two additional tests: (4) static curvature and (5) static shear stress. Results demonstrated that FSRs experienced significant errors all five tests. We concluded that: (1) if used carefully, FSRs can provide an estimate of prosthetic interface pressure, but these measurements should be interpreted within the expected range of possible measurement error given the setup; (2) FSRs should be calibrated in a setup that closely matches how they will be used for taking measurements; and (3) both Flexiforce and Interlink sensors can be used to estimate interface pressures, however in most cases Flexiforce sensors are likely to provide more accurate measurements.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31017621      PMCID: PMC6808001          DOI: 10.1115/1.4043561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  24 in total

1.  Socket/stump interface dynamic pressure distributions recorded during the prosthetic stance phase of gait of a trans-tibial amputee wearing a hydrocast socket.

Authors:  P Convery; A W Buis
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit.

Authors:  A A Polliack; R C Sieh; D D Craig; S Landsberger; D R McNeil; E Ayyappa
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Standing interface stresses as a predictor of walking interface stresses in the trans-tibial prosthesis.

Authors:  S G Zachariah; J E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Properties of the flexible pressure sensor under laboratory conditions simulating the internal environment of the total surface bearing socket.

Authors:  K Hachisuka; M Takahashi; H Ogata; S Ohmine; H Shitama; K Shinkoda
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Calibration problems encountered while monitoring stump/socket interface pressures with force sensing resistors: techniques adopted to minimise inaccuracies.

Authors:  A W Buis; P Convery
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Static and cyclic performance evaluation of sensors for human interface pressure measurement.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Dabling; Anton Filatov; Jason W Wheeler
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

7.  Evaluation of a new geriatric foot versus the Solid Ankle Cushion Heel foot for low-activity amputees.

Authors:  Xavier Bonnet; Jean N Adde; François Blanchard; Annick Gedouin-Toquet; Dominique Eveno
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Katheryn J Allyn; Daniel S Harrison; Marcia A Ciol
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

10.  Development of an air pneumatic suspension system for transtibial prostheses.

Authors:  Gholamhossein Pirouzi; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Azim Ataollahi Oshkour; Sadeeq Ali; Hossein Gholizadeh; Wan A B Wan Abas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  1 in total

1.  Simultaneous monitoring of mouse grip strength, force profile, and cumulative force profile distinguishes muscle physiology following surgical, pharmacologic and diet interventions.

Authors:  Joseph J Munier; Justin T Pank; Amie Severino; Huan Wang; Peixiang Zhang; Laurent Vergnes; Karen Reue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.