Literature DB >> 24933719

How do walking, standing, and resting influence transtibial amputee residual limb fluid volume?

Joan E Sanders1, John C Cagle, Katheryn J Allyn, Daniel S Harrison, Marcia A Ciol.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine how fluid volume changes in the residual limbs of people with transtibial amputation were affected by activity during test sessions with equal durations of resting, standing, and walking. Residual limb extracellular fluid volume was measured using biompedance analysis in 24 participants. Results showed that all subjects lost fluid volume during standing with equal weight-bearing, averaging a loss rate of -0.4%/min and a mean loss over the 25 min test session of 2.6% (standard deviation [SD] 1.1). Sixteen subjects gained limb fluid volume during walking (mean gain of 1.0% [SD 2.5]), and fifteen gained fluid volume during rest (mean gain of 1.0% [SD 2.2]). Walking explained only 39.3% of the total session fluid volume change. There was a strong correlation between walk and rest fluid volume changes (-0.81). Subjects with peripheral arterial disease experienced relatively high fluid volume gains during sitting but minimal changes or losses during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitioning. Healthy female subjects experienced high fluid volume changes during transitioning from sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit. The differences in fluid volume response among subjects suggest that volume accommodation technologies should be matched to the activity-dependent fluid transport characteristics of the individual prosthesis user.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activity; bioimpedance; compensation; diabetes; fluid transport; interface stress; peripheral arterial disease; prosthesis; prosthetic fit; volume accommodation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933719      PMCID: PMC4435803          DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.04.0085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  11 in total

Review 1.  Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: A consensus statement (France, March 5-9, 1997).

Authors:  A N Nicolaides
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions.

Authors:  W J Board; G M Street; C Caspers
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: a technological review.

Authors:  A De Lorenzo; A Andreoli; J Matthie; P Withers
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-05

4.  How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Katheryn J Allyn; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Elaine C Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Use and utility of ankle brachial index in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  L Potier; C Abi Khalil; K Mohammedi; R Roussel
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Sex-related effects on venous compliance and capillary filtration in the lower limb.

Authors:  M Lindenberger; T Länne
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Ankle--brachial index, vascular calcifications and mortality in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Teresa Adragao; Ana Pires; Patrícia Branco; Rui Castro; Ana Oliveira; Cristina Nogueira; Joaquim Bordalo; José Dias Curto; Mateus Martins Prata
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: case study results using bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

9.  Extracellular and intracellular volume variations during postural change measured by segmental and wrist-ankle bioimpedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marianne Fenech; Michel Y Jaffrin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Post-doffing residual limb fluid volume change in people with trans-tibial amputation.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; John C Cagle; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of Force Sensing Resistors for the Measurement of Interface Pressures in Lower Limb Prosthetics.

Authors:  Eric Swanson; Ethan Weathersby; John Cagle; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Development of Standardized Material Testing Protocols for Prosthetic Liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  A Novel Method for Assessing Prosthesis Use and Accommodation Practices of People with Transtibial Amputation.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Christian B Redd; Brian G Larsen; Andrew C Vamos; Jacob T Brzostowski; Brian J Hafner; Katheryn J Allyn; Katrina Henrikson; Jake B McLean; Paul Hinrichs
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2018-10

4.  Retracting Locking-Pin Mechanism That Allows Partial Prosthetic Socket Doffing during Sitting.

Authors:  Mark D Goldstein; John C Cagle; Brian J Hafner; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2018-04

5.  Structural changes in the thigh muscles following trans-femoral amputation.

Authors:  C Putz; J Block; S Gantz; D W W Heitzmann; T Dreher; B Lehner; M Alimusaj; S I Wolf; S Müller
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  A Bioimpedance Analysis Platform for Amputee Residual Limb Assessment.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Mark A Moehring; Travis M Rothlisberger; Reid H Phillips; Tyler Hartley; Colin R Dietrich; Christian B Redd; David W Gardner; John C Cagle
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Jacob T Brzostowski; Brian G Larsen; Robert T Youngblood; Marcia A Ciol; Brian J Hafner; Clement J Gurrey; Jake B McLean; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Volume Fluctuations in Active and Nonactive Transtibial Prosthetics Users.

Authors:  Nur Afiqah Hamzah; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak; Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim; Siti Zuliana Salleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Effectiveness of elevated vacuum and suction prosthetic suspension systems in managing daily residual limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Robert T Youngblood; Jacob T Brzostowski; Brian J Hafner; Joseph M Czerniecki; Katheryn J Allyn; Richard L Foster; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.895

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.