Literature DB >> 31000969

Long-Term Surface Electrode Impedance Recordings Associated with Gliosis for a Closed-Loop Neurostimulation Device.

Karl A Sillay1,2,3, Solomon Ondoma1, Brett Wingeier4, Dominic Schomberg1, Priyanka Sharma1, Rahul Kumar5, Gurwattan S Miranpuri1, Justin Williams2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Closed-loop neurostimulation is a novel alternative therapy for medically intractable focal epilepsy for patients who are not candidates for surgical resection of a seizure focus. Electrodes for this system can be implanted either within the brain parenchyma or in the subdural space. The electrodes then serve the dual role of detecting seizures and delivering an electrical signal aimed at aborting seizure activity. The Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS®) system (Neuropace, Mountain View, CA, USA) is an FDA-approved implantable device designed for this purpose.
OBJECTIVE: One of the challenges of the brain machine interface devices is the potential for implanted neurostimulator devices to induce progressive gliosis, apart from that associated with the minimal trauma at implantation. Gliosis has the potential to alter impedances over time, thereby affecting the clinical efficacy of these devices, and also poses a challenge to the prospects of in vivo repositioning of depth electrodes. We present a clinical case with 3-year follow-up and pathology.
METHODS: Single-case, retrospective review within a randomized trial with specific minimum follow-up and impedance measurements.
RESULTS: Impedance changes in the surface electrode over time were observed. Surgical pathological findings revealed significant gliosis in the leptomeninges of the cortices.
CONCLUSION: We report, for the first time, long-term impedance recordings from a surface electrode associated with pathologic findings of gliosis at the Neuropace device-tissue interface in a patient who was enrolled in the multicenter RNS System Pivotal Clinical Investigation. Further study is required to elucidate the temporal relationship of pathological findings over time. Impedance changes were more complex than can be explained by a progressive or transient pathological mechanism. Further effort is required to elucidate the relationship between impedance change and seizure event capture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrode; Gliosis; Impedance; Neuromodulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31000969      PMCID: PMC6470334          DOI: 10.1159/000481805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurosci        ISSN: 0972-7531


  38 in total

1.  Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant.

Authors:  M F Dorman; L M Smith; K Dankowski; G McCandless; J L Parkin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-10

2.  Microstimulation in auditory cortex provides a substrate for detailed behaviors.

Authors:  Kevin J Otto; Patrick J Rousche; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Xuefeng F Wei; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Kevin J Otto; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Increase of collagen synthesis and deposition in the arachnoid and the dura following subarachnoid hemorrhage in the rat.

Authors:  J Sajanti; A S Björkstrand; S Finnilä; E Heikkinen; J Peltonen; K Majamaa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-08-30

6.  Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants.

Authors:  J N Turner; W Shain; D H Szarowski; M Andersen; S Martins; M Isaacson; H Craighead
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 7.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes.

Authors:  Vadim S Polikov; Patrick A Tresco; William M Reichert
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Spectrum of clinical and histopathologic responses to intracranial electrodes: from multifocal aseptic meningitis to multifocal hypersensitivity-type meningovasculitis.

Authors:  C L Stephan; J J Kepes; K SantaCruz; S B Wilkinson; B Fegley; I Osorio
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 9.  Orbitofrontal epilepsy: electroclinical analysis of surgical cases and literature review.

Authors:  Joseph R Smith; Karl Sillay; Peter Winkler; Don W King; David W Loring
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.875

10.  Electron microscopy of tissue adherent to explanted electrodes in dystonia and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J Moss; T Ryder; T Z Aziz; M B Graeber; P G Bain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor.

Authors:  Enrico Opri; Stephanie Cernera; Rene Molina; Robert S Eisinger; Jackson N Cagle; Leonardo Almeida; Timothy Denison; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Microelectrode implants, inflammatory response and long-lasting effects on NADPH diaphorase neurons in the rat frontal cortex.

Authors:  Joanilson S Guimaraes; Nelson Alessandretti M Lemos; Marco Aurelio M Freire; Antonio Pereira; Sidarta Ribeiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Longitudinal analysis of local field potentials recorded from directional deep brain stimulation lead implants in the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  AnneMarie K Brinda; Alex M Doyle; Madeline Blumenfeld; Jordan Krieg; Joseph S R Alisch; Chelsea Spencer; Emily Lecy; Lucius K Wilmerding; Adele DeNicola; Luke A Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurorecovery and Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael J Young; David J Lin; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.212

5.  Trigeminal paresthesia secondary to responsive neurostimulation (RNS) lead migration.

Authors:  Zulfi Haneef; Alexandr Karimov; Vaishnav Krishnan; Sameer A Sheth
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-11-23

6.  The Impacts of Surgery and Intracerebral Electrodes in C57BL/6J Mouse Kainate Model of Epileptogenesis: Seizure Threshold, Proteomics, and Cytokine Profiles.

Authors:  Karen Tse; Edward Beamer; Deborah Simpson; Robert J Beynon; Graeme J Sills; Thimmasettappa Thippeswamy
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.