Literature DB >> 16209915

Microstimulation in auditory cortex provides a substrate for detailed behaviors.

Kevin J Otto1, Patrick J Rousche, Daryl R Kipke.   

Abstract

Sensory cortical prostheses have potential to aid people suffering from blindness, deafness and other sensory deficits. However, research to date has shown that sensation thresholds via epicortical stimulation are surprisingly large. These thresholds result in potentially deleterious electrical currents, as well as large activation volumes. Large activation volumes putatively limit the corresponding number of independent stimulation channels in a neural prosthesis. In this study, penetrating stimulation of the auditory cortex was tested for its ability to transmit salient information to behaving rat subjects. Here, we show that subjects that were previously trained to discriminate natural stimuli immediately discriminated different microstimulation cues more accurately and with shorter response latencies than the natural stimuli. Additionally, the cortical microstimulation resulted in a generalization gradient across locations within the cortex. The results demonstrate the efficacy of using closely spaced cortical microstimulation to efficiently transmit highly salient and discriminable information to a behaving subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16209915     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  26 in total

Review 1.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Primate reaching cued by multichannel spatiotemporal cortical microstimulation.

Authors:  N A Fitzsimmons; W Drake; T L Hanson; M A Lebedev; M A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Yanmei Tie
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Finite element analysis of a floating microstimulator.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Syed S Ur-Rahman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Perceived intensity of somatosensory cortical electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Gene Y Fridman; Hugh T Blair; Aaron P Blaisdell; Jack W Judy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Constant RMS versus constant peak modulation for the perceptual equivalence of sinusoidal amplitude modulated signals.

Authors:  Oliver B Regele; Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

7.  A computational model that predicts behavioral sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Optogenetic micro-electrocorticography for modulating and localizing cerebral cortex activity.

Authors:  Thomas J Richner; Sanitta Thongpang; Sarah K Brodnick; Amelia A Schendel; Ryan W Falk; Lisa A Krugner-Higby; Ramin Pashaie; Justin C Williams
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Depth-dependent detection of microampere currents delivered to monkey V1.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a Micro-Neural Interface Material for Electrostimulation.

Authors:  Seth J Wilks; Sarah M Richardson-Burns; Jeffrey L Hendricks; David C Martin; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.