Literature DB >> 16003894

Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances.

Matthew D Johnson1, Kevin J Otto, Daryl R Kipke.   

Abstract

Reactive tissue encapsulation of chronically implanted microelectrode probes can preclude long-term recording of extracellular action potentials. We investigated an intervention strategy for functionally encapsulated microelectrode sites. This method, known as "rejuvenation," involved applying a +1.5 V dc bias to an iridium site for 4 s. Previous studies have demonstrated that rejuvenation resulted in higher signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) by decreasing noise levels, and reduced 1-kHz site impedances by decreasing the tissue interface resistances. In this study, we have investigated: 1) the duration of a single-voltage bias session and 2) the efficacy of multiple sessions. These questions were addressed through electrophysiological recordings, cyclic voltammetry, and modeling the electrode-tissue interface via an equivalent circuit model fit to impedance spectroscopy data. In the six implants studied, we found SNRs improved for 1-7 days with a peak typically occurring within 24 h of the voltage bias. Root-mean square (RMS) noise of the extracellular recordings decreased for 1-2 days, which paralleled a similar decrease in the adsorbed tissue resistance (Ren) from the model. Implants whose SNR effects lasted more than a day showed stabilized reductions in the extracellular tissue resistance (Rex) and cellular membrane area (Am). Subsequent stimulus sessions were found to drop neural tissue parameters consistently to levels observed immediately after surgery. In most cases, these changes did parallel an improvement in SNR. These findings suggest that rejuvenation may be a useful intervention strategy to prolong the lifetime of chronically implanted microelectrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16003894     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  35 in total

1.  Voltage biasing, cyclic voltammetry, & electrical impedance spectroscopy for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Seth J Wilks; Tom J Richner; Sarah K Brodnick; Daryl R Kipke; Justin C Williams; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

3.  Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Christopher B Maks; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Matthew D Johnson; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Kip A Ludwig; Rachel M Miriani; Nicholas B Langhals; Michael D Joseph; David J Anderson; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Assistive technology and robotic control using motor cortex ensemble-based neural interface systems in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  John P Donoghue; Arto Nurmikko; Michael Black; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  High-resolution local field potentials measured with deep brain stimulation arrays.

Authors:  Simeng Zhang; Allison T Connolly; Lauren R Madden; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Ultrasoft microwire neural electrodes improve chronic tissue integration.

Authors:  Zhanhong Jeff Du; Christi L Kolarcik; Takashi D Y Kozai; Silvia D Luebben; Shawn A Sapp; Xin Sally Zheng; James A Nabity; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Inhibition of the cluster of differentiation 14 innate immunity pathway with IAXO-101 improves chronic microelectrode performance.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Madhumitha Ravikumar; Andrew J Shoffstall; Evon S Ereifej; Kyle M Kovach; Jeremy Chang; Arielle Soffer; Chun Wong; Vishnupriya Srivastava; Patrick Smith; Grace Protasiewicz; Jingle Jiang; Stephen M Selkirk; Robert H Miller; Steven Sidik; Nicholas P Ziats; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Evaluation of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/carbon nanotube neural electrode coatings for stimulation in the dorsal root ganglion.

Authors:  Christi L Kolarcik; Kasey Catt; Erika Rost; Ingrid N Albrecht; Dennis Bourbeau; Zhanhong Du; Takashi D Y Kozai; Xiliang Luo; Douglas J Weber; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.