Literature DB >> 11488890

Spectrum of clinical and histopathologic responses to intracranial electrodes: from multifocal aseptic meningitis to multifocal hypersensitivity-type meningovasculitis.

C L Stephan1, J J Kepes, K SantaCruz, S B Wilkinson, B Fegley, I Osorio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to characterize and compare the histopathologic and clinical changes elicited by subdural and depth electrodes in subjects undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation.
METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical records, imaging and histopathologic studies of epilepsy surgery cases requiring subdural strips and depth electrodes for localization of epileptogenic tissue was performed between 1993 and 1999. Forty-nine subjects had a combination of subdural and depth, whereas 10 had depth electrodes only. Histopathologic changes were classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on the density, extent, and composition of the inflammatory infiltrate.
RESULTS: Subdural electrodes induced a clinical picture of transient aseptic meningitis; histopathologically, the infiltrates were moderate in degree in the majority (73%) and severe in the remainder (27%), with T cells and eosinophils infiltrating the cortex and arteriolar walls (hypersensitivity-type response). Depth electrodes alone caused minimal or no symptoms of meningeal irritation; the cellular response elicited by these electrodes was mild in five and moderate in the remaining five cases; severe inflammation was not observed in this group. Although the proportion of small clinically silent hematomas was larger in cases with depth (five of 59) compared with subdural electrodes (one of 49), microhemorrhages were considerably more numerous with subdural than with depth electrodes.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the spectrum of brain responses to foreign bodies is wide, ranging from self-limited physiologic to hypersensitivity-type reactions of varying severity. Subdural strips elicited more intense inflammation than did depth electrodes. The histopathologic extent of the reaction to either type of electrodes could not be precisely defined because of the retrospective nature of this study. History of allergy to latex or previous craniotomies are probable risk factors for the hypersensitivity-type reaction. Surgical outcome, excellent in the majority, was independent of the severity or type of inflammation, and there have not been neurologic or systemic sequelae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11488890     DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.042007895.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  9 in total

1.  Hematoma-Related Nonhabitual Seizures during Subdural Electrode Monitoring.

Authors:  Kyoung Jin Hwang; Eun Yeon Joo; Seung Bong Hong; Dae Won Seo
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Intracranial electrode implantation produces regional neuroinflammation and memory deficits in rats.

Authors:  Yafit Kuttner Hirshler; Uri Polat; Anat Biegon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 3.  Blood-brain barrier dysfunction and epilepsy: pathophysiologic role and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Nicola Marchi; Tiziana Granata; Chaitali Ghosh; Damir Janigro
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Increased striatal serotonin synthesis following cortical resection in children with intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  Harry T Chugani; Csaba Juhász; Diane C Chugani; Lesley Lawrenson; Otto Muzik; Pulak K Chakraborty; Sandeep Sood
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Long-Term Surface Electrode Impedance Recordings Associated with Gliosis for a Closed-Loop Neurostimulation Device.

Authors:  Karl A Sillay; Solomon Ondoma; Brett Wingeier; Dominic Schomberg; Priyanka Sharma; Rahul Kumar; Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Justin Williams
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-14

6.  Cerebral edema associated with ventricular reservoirs in two patients: a case report.

Authors:  Marshall C Cress; Angela N Spurgeon; Douglas C Miller; N Scott Litofsky
Journal:  Case Rep Neurol Med       Date:  2012-02-26

7.  Hippocampal neurogenesis and the brain repair response to brief stereotaxic insertion of a microneedle.

Authors:  Shijie Song; Shuojing Song; Chuanhai Cao; Xiaoyang Lin; Kunyu Li; Vasyl Sava; Juan Sanchez-Ramos
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.443

8.  Organic electronics for high-resolution electrocorticography of the human brain.

Authors:  Dion Khodagholy; Jennifer N Gelinas; Zifang Zhao; Malcolm Yeh; Michael Long; Jeremy D Greenlee; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Biomimetic extracellular matrix coatings improve the chronic biocompatibility of microfabricated subdural microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Flavia Vitale; Wendy Shen; Nicolette Driscoll; Justin C Burrell; Andrew G Richardson; Oladayo Adewole; Brendan Murphy; Akshay Ananthakrishnan; Hanju Oh; Theodore Wang; Timothy H Lucas; D Kacy Cullen; Mark G Allen; Brian Litt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.