Literature DB >> 1447922

Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant.

M F Dorman1, L M Smith, K Dankowski, G McCandless, J L Parkin.   

Abstract

Measures of electrode impedance and of detection thresholds for electrical stimuli were extracted from the records of patients implanted with the Ineraid cochlear prosthesis. An analysis of impedance measures, obtained at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, demonstrated (a) a significant decrease in impedance over the first year for electrodes that carried current and (b) significant increases in impedance at 24 and 36 months for electrodes that did not carry current. An analysis of detection thresholds, obtained at the same times as the impedance measures, demonstrated that averaged thresholds for the current-carrying electrodes varied no more than 0.5 dB over the 3-year period. These results support the conclusion that stimulation with the Ineraid device does not produce deleterious changes in the electrodes or in the target neural tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1447922     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3505.1126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  11 in total

1.  Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  T Hanekom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Chloé de Balthasar; Sweta Patel; Arup Roy; Ricardo Freda; Scott Greenwald; Alan Horsager; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Douglas Yanai; Matthew J McMahon; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  How well do cochlear implant intraoperative impedance measures predict postoperative electrode function?

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Rodney P Lusk
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Influence of materials and geometry on fields produced by cochlear electrode arrays.

Authors:  H A Ruddy; G E Loeb
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Design and performance of a multichannel vestibular prosthesis that restores semicircular canal sensation in rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Bryce Chiang; Gene Y Fridman; Chenkai Dai; Mehdi A Rahman; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Nanoscale neuroelectrode modification via sub-20 nm silicon nanowires through self-assembly of block copolymers.

Authors:  Parvaneh Mokarian-Tabari; Catalina Vallejo-Giraldo; Marc Fernandez-Yague; Cian Cummins; Michael A Morris; Manus J P Biggs
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Hyejin Yang; Jeong-Seo Kim; Helin Hernandez; Jacob J Oleson; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

8.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Long-Term Surface Electrode Impedance Recordings Associated with Gliosis for a Closed-Loop Neurostimulation Device.

Authors:  Karl A Sillay; Solomon Ondoma; Brett Wingeier; Dominic Schomberg; Priyanka Sharma; Rahul Kumar; Gurwattan S Miranpuri; Justin Williams
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-14

10.  Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.

Authors:  Maciej Wilk; Roland Hessler; Kenneth Mugridge; Claude Jolly; Michael Fehr; Thomas Lenarz; Verena Scheper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.