| Literature DB >> 30974860 |
Besma Omri1,2, Raja Chalghoumi3, Luana Izzo4, Alberto Ritieni5, Massimo Lucarini6, Alessandra Durazzo7, Hédi Abdouli8, Antonello Santini9.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of linseed incorporation in laying hens' feed (alone or along with a tomato-red pepper mix) on laying hens' egg yolk fatty acids profile, as well as on their atherogenic (IA) and thrombogenic (IT) health lipid indexes, and the ratio between the hypocholesterolemic and hypercholesterolemic fatty acids (HH). Sixty 27 weeks-old Novogen White laying hens were divided into three groups and given 100 g/hen/day of a standard diet (Control, C) containing 4.5% of ground linseed (Linseed diet, L), containing 1% of dried tomato paste and 1% sweet red pepper (Lineseeds-Tomato-Pepper, LTP). The linseed dietary inclusion significantly reduced the egg yolk content of palmitic acid from 25.41% (C) to 23.43% (L) and that of stearic acid from 14.75% (C) to 12.52% (L). Feeding 4.5% ground linseed did not affect the egg yolk content of α-Linolenic acid but significantly increased the egg yolk concentration of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) from 0.011% (C) to 0.047% (L) and that of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from 1.94% (C) to 2.73% (L). The IA and the HH were not affected (p > 0.05) by the dietary addition of linseed, whereas the IT decreased (p < 0.05) from 1.16 (C) to 0.86 (L). Adding tomato-sweet red pepper mix to the linseed-supplemented feed did not affect the measured parameters as compared to the linseed dietary treatment.Entities:
Keywords: atherogenic; fatty acids; pepper; thrombogenic; tomato; yolk
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30974860 PMCID: PMC6521111 DOI: 10.3390/nu11040813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Ingredients, and chemical and fatty acids composition of the experimental diets *.
| Diets | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (C) | Linseeds (L) | Linseeds-Tomato-Pepper (LTP) | |
|
| |||
| Linseed | 0 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Fenugreek seed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dried Tomato | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sweet red pepper | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Yellow corn | 66.5 | 63.5 | 61.5 |
| Soybean meal | 25.5 | 24 | 24 |
| Calcium carbonate, Mineral and Vitamin mixture α | 8 | 8 | 8 |
|
| |||
| Crude protein, (%, DM) | 18.1 | 18 | 18 |
| Ether extract (%, DM) | 3.56 | 5.6 | 5.27 |
| Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg DM) | 2750 | 2850 | 2830 |
|
| |||
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 14.13 | 12.80 | 11.61 |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 3.81 | 5.72 | 5.39 |
| Oleic (C18:1) | 22.55 | 11.33 | 16.29 |
| Linoleic (C18:2) | 51.69 | 48.56 | 47.22 |
| α-Linolenic (C18:3) | 1.13 | 17.27 | 19.95 |
| ∑ SFA | 18.81 | 19.97 | 18.78 |
| ∑ PUFA-ω3 | 1.13 | 17.17 | 19.95 |
* C = Control diet; L = diet supplemented with ground linseed at 4.5%, LTP = diet supplemented with ground linseed (4.5%), dried tomato paste (1%) and sweet pepper powder (1%) mix; ΣSFA: sum of saturated fatty acids; ΣMUFA: sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; ΣPUFA: sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids; ΣPUFA-ω6 = C18:2ω- 6 + C20:2ω-6 + C20:4ω-6; ΣPUFA-ω3 = C18:3ω-3 + C20:3ω-3 + C20:5ω-3 + C22:6ω-3; DM = Dry Matter. α Control (C) provided following nutrients per 100 g: Ca, 4.3 g; P, 0.6 g; Na, 0.14 g; Cl, 0.23 g; Fe, 4 mg; Zn, 40 mg; Mn, 7 mg; Cu, 0.3 mg; I, 0.08 mg; Se, 0.01 mg; Co, 0.02 g; methionine, 0.39 g; methionine + cysteine, 0.69 g; lysine, 0.89 g; Retinol, 800 IU; Cholecalciferol, 220 IU; α-tocopherol, 1.1 IU; Thiamin, 0.33 IU; Nicotinic acid, 909 IU.
Fatty acids composition (% of total fat) of egg yolk $.
| Item | Diets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | L | LTP | SEM γ | P | |
| Total fat, % DM | 39.85 | 46.15 | 43.05 | 2.11 | NS |
| Pentadeconoic (C15:0) | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.007 | NS |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 25.41 a | 23.43 b | 23.6 b | 1.06 | * |
| Margaric (C17:0) | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.02 | NS |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 14.75 a | 12.53 b | 11.85 b | 0.68 | * |
| Nonadecanoic (C19:0) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.004 | NS |
| Arachidic (C20:0) | 0.05 a | 0.04 b | 0.041 b | 0.003 | * |
| Palmitoleic (C16:1) | 4.16 a | 3.28 b | 3.38 b | 0.22 | NS |
| Hexadicadienoic (C16:2) | 0.03 | 0.024 | 0.02 | 0.002 | NS |
| Hexadicatrienoic (C16:3) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.003 | NS |
| Oleic (C18:1) | 24.4 b | 26.9 a | 26.68 a | 1.82 | * |
| Linoleic (C18:2) | 20.70 | 20.44 | 20.03 | 0.02 | NS |
| α-Linolenic (C18:3) | 0.34 b | 1.77 a | 1.89 a | 0.8 | NS |
| Nonadecenoic (C19:1) | 0.025 b | 0.043 a,b | 0.044 a,b | 0.005 | * |
| Gadoleic (C20:1) | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.04 | NS |
| Eicosadienoic (C20:2) | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.03 | NS |
| Eicosatrienoic (C20:3) | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.04 | NS |
| Arachidonic (C20:4) | 2.6 | 2.28 | 2.29 | 0.49 | NS |
| Eicosapentanoic (C20:5) | 0.01 b | 0.05 a | 0.033 a,b | 0.06 | * |
| Docosahexaenoic (C22:6) | 1.94 b | 2.73 a | 2.66 a | 0.18 | * |
$ C = Control diet; L = diet supplemented with ground linseed at 4.5%, LTP = diet supplemented with ground linseed (4.5%), dried tomato (1%) and sweet pepper powder (1%) mix; γ SEM = standard error of the mean; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant: * = p < 0.05, NS = p ≥ 0.05, NS = Not Significant. a,b: Means within the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Sum and ratios of fatty acids (%) and health lipid indexes of lyophilized eggs’ yolks $.
| Diets | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | L | LTP | SEM γ | P | |
| ∑ SFA | 40.51 a | 36.28 b | 35.81 b | 1.10 | * |
| ∑ MUFA | 28.38 | 30.59 | 30.39 | 1.52 | NS |
| ∑ PUFA | 26.41 b | 27.94 a | 27.56 a | 1.4 | * |
| ∑ PUFA-ω6 | 23.51 | 22.91 | 22.52 | 0.7 | NS |
| ∑ PUFA-ω3 | 2.86 b | 4.99 a | 5.0 a | 0.25 | * |
| ∑ω-6/∑ω-3 | 8.22 a | 4.59 b | 4.5 b | 1.82 | * |
| IA | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.07 | NS |
| HH | 1.92 | 2.41 | 2.36 | 0.91 | NS |
| IT | 1.16 a | 0.86 b | 0.85 b | 0.15 | * |
C = Control diet; L = diet supplemented with ground linseed at 4.5%, LTP = diet supplemented with ground linseed (4.5%), dried tomato (1%) and sweet pepper powder (1%) mix; ΣSFA: sum of saturated fatty acids; ΣMUFA: Sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; ΣPUFA: sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids; ΣPUFA-ω6 = C18:2ω-6 + C20:2ω-6 + C20:4ω-6; ΣPUFA-ω3 = C18:3ω-3 + C20:3ω-3 + C20:5ω-3 + C22:6ω-3; γ SEM = Standard error of the mean; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant: * = p < 0.05, NS = p ≥ 0.05, NS = Not Significant. a,b: Means within the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).