| Literature DB >> 25587451 |
A Altuntaş1, R Aydin2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of diet supplemented with marigold on egg yolk fatty acid composition and egg quality parameters. Sixty hens were assigned into three groups and fed diets supplemented with 0 (control), 10 g kg(-1), or 20 g kg(-1) marigold for 42 days. Eggs collected at the 6th week of the study were analyzed for fatty acid analysis. Laying performance, egg quality parameters, and feed intake were also evaluated. Yolk color scores in the group fed the 20 g kg(-1) marigold-supplemented diet were found greater than control (10.77 versus 9.77). Inclusion of 20 g kg(-1) marigold in diet influenced egg weights adversely compared to the control. Diet supplemented with 10 g kg(-1) or 20 g kg(-1) marigold increased the levels of C16:0 and C18:0 and decreased levels of C16:1 (n-7) and C18:1 (n-9) in the egg yolk. Also, diet including marigold increased total saturated fatty acids (SFA) and decreased monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) in the egg yolk.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25587451 PMCID: PMC4284980 DOI: 10.1155/2014/564851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipids ISSN: 2090-3049
Composition of the experimental diets1(as dry-matter basis).
| Supplementation of | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Feed ingredients | 0 | 10 | 20 |
| Corn | 420.5 | 420.5 | 420.5 |
| Barley | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Soybean meal | 124 | 124 | 124 |
| Sunflower meal | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Wheat middlings | 120 | 110 | 100 |
|
| 0 | 10 | 20 |
| Vegetable oil | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| Limestone | 82 | 82 | 82 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Lysine | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| DL-Methionine | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| NaCl | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Vitamin premix | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
| |||
| Total | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
1Diets contained per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 8000 IU/kg; vitamin D, 1500 IU/kg; riboflavin, 4 mg/kg; cobalamin, 10 ug/kg; vitamin E, 15 mg/kg; vitamin K, 2 mg/kg; choline, 500 mg/kg; niacin, 25 mg/kg; manganese, 60 mg/kg; zinc, 50 mg/kg.
The effects of Tagetes erecta L. supplementation on body weight, feed consumption, egg production, and egg weight.
| Supplementation of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | SEM | |
| Initial body weight (g) | 1259 | 1279 | 1250 | 24 |
| Final body weight (g) | 1316 | 1320 | 1270 | 28 |
| Feed consumption g/bird | 128.1 | 123.57 | 117.26 | 3.87 |
| Egg production (%) | 72.0 | 76.67 | 71.33 | 2.93 |
| Egg weight (g) | 70.69a | 70.21a | 67.97b | 0.31 |
1Diets were supplemented with 0, 10, or 20 g/kg marigold flower for 6 weeks.
a,bValues are expressed as means and without a common superscript are significantly different within a row (P < 0.05).
The effects of diets supplemented with different levels of Tagetes erecta L. on the egg parameters1.
| Supplementation of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10 | 20 | SEM | |
| Egg weight (g) | 69.67 | 69.99 | 68.58 | 1.02 |
| Albumen weight (g/egg) | 45.27 | 44.28 | 43.06 | 1.20 |
| Yolk weight (g/egg) | 18.80 | 18.71 | 18.78 | 0.23 |
| Shell weight (g/egg) | 6.64 | 6.69 | 6.72 | 0.17 |
| Yolk % | 27.44 | 26.98 | 27.53 | 0.41 |
| Albumen % | 64.49 | 63.43 | 62.62 | 0.87 |
| Shell % | 9.58 | 9.58 | 9.83 | 0.24 |
| Albumen index | 7.87 | 7.80 | 7.32 | 0.31 |
| Yolk index | 41.99 | 40.86 | 40.67 | 0.53 |
| Shape index | 73.50 | 73.41 | 73.77 | 0.38 |
| Haugh unit | 69.54 | 68.79 | 67.85 | 1.96 |
| Shell thickness (mm | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.01 |
| Shell strength (kg/cm2) | 1.03b | 1.32a | 1.15ab | 0.09 |
| 2RCF values | 9.77b | 10.40ab | 10.77a | 0.18 |
1Eggs were collected in last week of the study and values are expressed as means and without a common superscript are significantly different within a row (P < 0.05).
2RCF: Roche color fan.
The effects of Tagetes erecta L. supplementation on the fatty acid composition of egg yolks1.
| Supplementation of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acids | 0 | 10 | 20 | SEM |
| C14:0 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.01 |
| C16:0 | 24.75b | 25.76a | 25.60a | 0.04 |
| C16:1 (n-7) | 3.30a | 3.15b | 2.77c | 0.01 |
| C18:0 | 7.30c | 8.02b | 8.76a | 0.04 |
| C18:1 (n-9t) | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.01 |
| C18:1 (n-9c) | 44.90a | 43.25b | 42.87c | 0.04 |
| C18:2 (n-6) | 16.46 | 16.54 | 16.59 | 0.05 |
|
| 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.02 |
| C20:1 (n-9) | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.01 |
| C20:2 (n-6) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
| C20:3 (n-3) | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.01 |
| C22:2 (n-6) | 1.17b | 1.19ab | 1.23a | 0.01 |
| C22:6 (n-3) | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.01 |
|
| 32.41c | 34.12b | 34.72a | 0.03 |
|
| 48.59a | 46.80b | 46.04c | 0.04 |
|
| 19.00 | 19.08 | 19.24 | 0.04 |
| n-6 | 17.92 | 18.03 | 18.16 | 0.05 |
| n-3 | 1.08 | 1.04 | 1.08 | 0.01 |
| n-6/n-3 | 16.59 | 17.34 | 16.89 | 0.25 |
| SFA/MUFA | 0.67b | 0.73b | 0.75a | 0.002 |
1Yolk samples of three fresh eggs from each treatment were obtained at the end of the study.
a,b,cMeans within a row for each variable with no common letter differ (P < 0.05).
∑SFA = total saturated fatty acids; ∑MUFA = total monounsaturated fatty acids; ∑PUFA = total polyunsaturated fatty acids; n-6: omega-6 fatty acids; n-3: omega-3 fatty acids.