| Literature DB >> 35209183 |
Anna Zbikowska1, Malgorzata Kowalska2, Katarzyna Zbikowska3, Sylwia Onacik-Gür4, Urszula Łempicka1, Paweł Turek5.
Abstract
According to international health and food organizations and authorities, people should limit fat intake since fat is the most caloric component of food and it is often a source of unsafe saturated fatty acids (FA) and trans isomers. The greatest health benefits come from replacing shorts with dietary fiber molecules. The aim of the study was to determine the possibility of reducing shortening content, which has an undesirable profile of FA, by addition of β-glucan molecules in shortbread biscuits. The effect of oat and yeast β-glucan supplementation on physical and sensory quality of products with reduced fat content (max 15%) were studied. It was shown that the substitution of shortening by β-glucan in shortbread biscuits is possible to a limited extent. Reduction in product energy value (up to 36 kcal/100 g) and content of undesirable FA (maximum 2.1 g/100 g) and increased of β-glucan content, regardless of the type, caused deterioration of biscuits quality and affected changes during storage. The substitution of shortening by β-glucan in food is a good way to improve nutritional value by increasing the amount of dietary fiber molecules, reducing calories, and amount of SFA in diets.Entities:
Keywords: dietary fiber; quality of shortbread biscuits; saturated fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35209183 PMCID: PMC8880506 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Characteristics of shortening and the atherosclerotic index (IA).
| AV | PV | Main Groups of Fatty Acids (FA) [%] | OFA | DFA | IA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFA | TFA | MUFA | Essential FA | |||||
| 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.02 | 51.60 ± 0.21 | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 39.94 ± 0.73 | 7.94 ± 0.24 | 52.12 | 47.88 | 1.13 |
AV—acid value, PV—peroxide value, FA—fatty acids; SFA—saturated FA; TFA—trans FA; MUFA—monoenic FA; DFA—desirable FA; OFA—undesirable FA.
Density and geometry of shortbread biscuits.
| Samples | Fat Reduction (%) | Density (g/cm3) | Diameter (mm) | Hight (mm) | SI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (control) | 0 | 0.72 a ± 0.02 | 56.18 d ± 0.87 | 6.14 cd ± 0.28 | 9.15 |
| A1 | 5 | 0.72 a ± 0.01 | 55.96 d ± 0.58 | 6.30 de ± 0.20 | 8.88 |
| A2 | 10 | 0.78 c ± 0.02 | 55.33 c ± 0.17 | 6.41 ef ± 0.23 | 8.63 |
| A3 | 15 | 0.82 d ± 0.00 | 54.85 b ± 0.47 | 6.52 f ± 0.32 | 8.41 |
| B1 | 5 | 0.75 b ± 0.02 | 55.09 bc ± 0.44 | 6.02 c ± 0.27 | 9.15 |
| B2 | 10 | 0.77 c ± 0.01 | 54.31 a ± 0.24 | 5.80 b ± 0.26 | 9.36 |
| B3 | 15 | 0.94 d ± 0.02 | 54.11 a ± 0.38 | 5.61 a ± 0.25 | 9.65 |
Different letters indicate significantly different values (p < 0.05). a, b, c, d—homogenous groups obtained by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Color parameter of shortbread biscuits after baking.
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | ΔE | IB | Chrome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 74.64 e ± 1.02 | 0.51 a ± 0.24 | 22.61 d ± 1.31 | - | 1.81 | 22.62 |
| A1 | 72.86 d ± 1.81 | 1.31 b ± 0.52 | 22.31 d ± 1.09 | 1.97 | 2.65 | 22.35 |
| A2 | 72.76 d ± 1.87 | 1.50 b ± 0.53 | 22.06 d ± 1.01 | 2.12 | 2.84 | 22.11 |
| A3 | 72.13 d ± 1.93 | 1.58 b ± 0.47 | 21.12 c ± 1.50 | 3.11 | 2.94 | 21.18 |
| B1 | 70.13 c ± 1.33 | 2.46 c ± 1.10 | 20.16 b ± 0.93 | 5.49 | 3.92 | 20.31 |
| B2 | 68.12 b ± 1.26 | 2.85 c ± 0.86 | 19.56 b ± 0.97 | 7.57 | 4.45 | 19.77 |
| B3 | 66.90 a ± 1.42 | 2.86 c ± 0.95 | 18.36 a ± 0.74 | 9.14 | 4.54 | 18.58 |
Different letters indicate significantly different values (p < 0.05). a, b, c, d, e—homogenous groups obtained by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Changes in color parameters of shortbread biscuits during storage: (a) L*; (b) a*; and (c) b* variants descriptions are given under Table 2.
Figure 2Shortbread biscuits color assessment: (a) chroma (C*); (b) browning index; and (c) total color difference (ΔE*).
Figure 3Changes of hardness in shortbread biscuits during storage.
Figure 4Water content changes in shortbread biscuits during storage.
Results of sensory analysis.
| Samples | 0 | A1 | A2 | A3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Appearance | |||||||
| color uniformity | 6.26 ± 1.41 | 6.33 ± 1.42 | 6.58 ± 1.71 | 6.74 ± 1.07 | 6.95 ± 1.33 | 7.45 ± 1.33 | 8.38 ± 1.14 | |
| cracking | 0.88 ± 0.45 | 0.81 ± 0.56 | 2.08 ± 0.98 | 3.91 ± 1.02 | 2.91 ± 0.88 | 4.45 ± 1.23 | 4.75 ± 1.34 | |
| Texture | ||||||||
| hardness | 6.35 ± 1.51 | 5.64 ± 1.04 | 5.31 ± 1.24 | 3.13 ± 1.03 | 3.15 ± 1.00 | 2.05 ± 1.02 | 1.58 ± 0.67 | |
| crispness | 8.34 ± 1.16 | 8.48 ± 1.01 | 8.39 ± 1.17 | 6.88 ± 1.03 | 7.10 ± 1.08 | 6.89 ± 0.98 | 4.9 ± 0.92 | |
| Odor | ||||||||
| typical | 7.58 ± 1.46 | 7.95 ± 1.27 | 8.1 ± 0.98 | 7.91 ± 2.06 | 5.93 ± 0.98 | 5.2 ± 1.02 | 2.44 ± 0.65 | |
| oily | 6.7 ± 0.97 | 4.79 ± 1.02 | 3.03 ± 0.65 | 2.25 ± 1.21 | 5.05 ± 1.23 | 5.91 ± 1.72 | 7.25 ± 2.17 | |
| floury | 1.69 ± 0.67 | 0.83 ± 0.24 | 1.51 ± 0.45 | 2.3 ± 1.02 | 1.08 ± 0.21 | 0.96 ± 0.22 | 0.75 ± 0.21 | |
| others | 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 0.46 ± 0.23 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 1.66 ± 0.54 | 4.8 ± 0.76 | 6.58 ± 1.54 | |
| Taste | ||||||||
| typical | 7.28 ± 1.21 | 7.86 ± 1.09 | 8.2 ± 0.82 | 6.76 ± 0.88 | 3.15 ± 1.02 | 2.18 ± 0.88 | 0.19 ± 0.08 | |
| oily | 5.89 ± 0.72 | 4.64 ± 1.48 | 3.79 ± 1.05 | 2.19 ± 1.00 | 4.2 ± 1.13 | 2.26 ± 0.99 | 1.85 ± 1.01 | |
| sweet | 5.94 ± 1.27 | 5.91 ± 0.77 | 5.01 ± 1.06 | 4.89 ± 1.18 | 3.48 ± 1.04 | 1.46 ± 1.05 | 0.85 ± 0.22 | |
| bitter | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.08 ± 1.02 | 7.28 ± 1.22 | 8.64 ± 2.89 | |
| others | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.32 | 0.88 ± 0.12 | 4.74 ± 1.01 | 7.61 ± 1.32 | 9.4 ± 0.69 | |
Figure 5Effect of fat substitution with β-glucan on overall sensory quality of shortbread biscuits after baking. Different letters indicate significantly different values (p < 0.05).
Correlation analysis between β-glucan content and physical and sensory parameters of biscuits.
| Parameter | Oat β-Glucan | Yeast β-Glucan | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | r | |||
| Weight | 0.37 | 0.006 | 0.26 | 0.021 |
| Width | −0.78 | 0 | −0.88 | 0 |
| Thickness | 0.48 | 0 | −0.62 | 0 |
| Volume | −0.89 | 0 | −0.91 | 0 |
| Texture | −0.30 | 0.026 | - | >0.5 |
| Water content | 0.96 | 0 | 0.35 | 0.091 |
| Color | ||||
| L* | - | >0.05 | −0.88 | 0 |
| a* | - | >0.05 | - | >0.05 |
| b* | −0.39 | 0.003 | −0.82 | 0 |
| Sensory analysis | ||||
| Overall quality | −0.39 | 0.0274 | −0.89 | 0 |
Lipid content, fatty acids (FA) profile, and calorific value of shortbread biscuits (g/100 g of products).
| Shortbread Biscuits | 0 | A1/B1 | A2/B2 | A3/B3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat (%) | 27.0% | 25.7 | 24.3 | 23.0 |
| SFA (%) | 13.9 | 13.2 | 12.5 | 11.8 |
| MUFA+PUFA (%) | 12.9 | 12.3 | 11.6 | 11.0 |
| Caloric value decrease (kcal) | - | 11.7 | 24.3 | 36.0 |
0—control sample (0% of β-glucan content and 100% of fat content); A1—sample with 1.3% of oat β-glucan content and with 5% reduction in fat content; A2—sample with 2.7% of oat β-glucan content and with 10% reduction in fat content; A3—sample with 4.0% of oat β-glucan content and with 15% reduction in fat content; B1—sample with 1.3% of yeast β-glucan content and with 5% reduction in fat content; B2—sample with 2.7% of yeast β-glucan content and with 10% reduction in fat content; B3—sample with 4.0% of yeast β-glucan content and with 15% reduction in fat content.