| Literature DB >> 30959815 |
Aurelio Lo Buglio1, Francesco Bellanti2, Cristiano Capurso3, Annalisa Paglia4, Gianluigi Vendemiale5.
Abstract
: This investigation aimed to explore the adherence to a Mediterranean Diet and its relationship with length of stay and in-hospital mortality, circulating interleukins, body composition, and frailty, in elderly patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards. Thus, a cross-sectional study in 194 acute hospitalized, community-dwelling elderly patients was performed. Adherence to a Mediterranean Diet was evaluated by the Italian Mediterranean Index (IMI). Length of stay, but not in-hospital mortality rate, was higher in patients with a low IMI score, as compared to subjects with high IMI score. Markers of systemic inflammation, as well as circulating interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha, were higher in patients with a low IMI score, with respect to patients with high IMI score. Furthermore, patients with low IMI score had increased fat mass and reduced lean mass, together with a higher prevalence of frailty, as compared to those presenting with high IMI score. In a multivariate logistic regression model, an IMI score < 3 resulted as an independent predictor of longer length of stay. In conclusion, low adherence to a Mediterranean Diet in elderly patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards is associated with higher length of stay and related to unfavorable changes in circulating pro-inflammatory markers and body composition.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; body composition; circulating interleukins; elderly
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30959815 PMCID: PMC6520862 DOI: 10.3390/nu11040790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients at baseline, according to study groups.
| Tertile I (score 0–3) | Tertile II (score 4–5) | Tertile III (score 6–11) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 73.8 ± 7.5 | 78.8 ± 7.1 | 81.3 ± 8.3 |
|
|
| 39/26 (60/40) | 32/52 (38/62) | 12/31 (31/69) |
|
|
| 16 (24.6) | 25 (29.8) | 17 (37.8) | 0.333 |
|
| 11.4 ± 1.5 | 10.8 ± 1.9 | 12.6 ± 2.1 |
|
|
| 5968.5 ± 1230.2 | 8508.9 ± 900.9 | 7480.9 ± 1104.0 | 0.061 |
|
| 1129.5 ± 616 | 1459.2 ± 802 | 1543.7 ± 620 |
|
|
| 126.7 ± 77.3 | 114.4 ± 48.9 | 112.5 ± 35.7 | 0.349 |
|
| 2.8 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.6 |
|
|
| 142.9 ± 42 | 140.2 ± 45.6 | 163.6 ± 45.1 |
|
|
| 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 0.159 |
|
| 116.7 ± 56.5 | 114.4 ± 52.7 | 104.6 ± 39.3 | 0.463 |
Statistical differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance or Pearson’s Chi-squared test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (in bold). WBC, white blood cells.
Nutritional status, cognitive status, physical performance, depression and frailty status in patients at baseline, according to study groups.
| Tertile I (score 0–3) | Tertile II (score 4–5) | Tertile III (score 6–11) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n. 45 (23.2%) | n. 84 (43.3%) | n. 65 (33.5%) | ||
|
| 12.3 [7.3–19.4] | 18.7 [10.2–22.1] | 22.4 [13.7–28.9] |
|
|
| 14.1 [9.7–21.3] | 21.4 [15.5–25.3] | 26.3 [23.9–28.0] |
|
|
| 1.9 ± 2.0 | 4.3 ± 2.0 | 5.7 ± 0.9 |
|
|
| 1.2 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 2.5 | 6.2 ± 2.1 |
|
|
| 5.0 [3.2–7.7] | 5.0 [2.0–8.0] | 2.0 [0.0–4.0] |
|
|
| 45 (100%) | 75 (8.3%) | 19 (29.2%) |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 27 (60.0%) | 30 (35.7%) | 2 (3.1%) |
|
|
| 42 (93.3%) | 74 (88.1%) | 33 (50.8%) |
|
|
| 43 (95.5%) | 63 (75%) | 18 (27.7%) |
|
|
| 45 (100%) | 68 (80.9%) | 18 (27.7%) |
|
|
| 45 (100%) | 73 (86.9%) | 22 (33.8) |
|
Statistical differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance or Pearson’s Chi-squared test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (in bold). MNA, mini-nutritional assessment; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; ADL, activity of daily living; IADL, instrumental activity of daily living, GDS-SF, geriatric depression scale short form.
Figure 1Length of stay in hospitalized elderly patients enrolled in this study and stratified according to the mini nutritional assessment at admission in well-fed (WF, N = 65), at risk of malnutrition (RM, N = 84), and malnourished (M, N = 45). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey as post hoc test. p Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Markers of systemic inflammation, circulating cytokines and growth factors in patients at baseline, according to study groups.
| Tertile I (score 0–3) | Tertile II (score 4–5) | Tertile III (score 6–11) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n. 45 (23.2%) | n. 84 (43.3%) | n. 65 (33.5%) | ||
|
| 6.8 ± 4.8 | 4.7 ± 3.2 | 3.1 ± 1.6 |
|
|
| 53.5 [28.5–76.7] | 43.5 [25–65.5] | 29.0 [12.0–57.0] |
|
|
| 26.8 [13.0–35.7] | 15.3 [6.5–23.2] | 4.4 [1.8–4.4] |
|
|
| 168 [64.5–394.0] | 130 [46.0–398.0] | 86 [44.5–154.2] |
|
|
| 0.83 ± 0.25 | 0.92 ± 0.31 | 0.72 ± 0.11 | 0.233 |
|
| 1.21 ± 0.99 | 0.93 ± 0.46 | 0.69 ± 0.19 | 0.112 |
|
| 21.66 ± 5.16 | 11.94 ± 5.77 | 3.37 ± 1.72 |
|
|
| 118.52 ± 46.09 | 89.92 ± 21.14 | 97.14 ± 28.72 | 0.585 |
|
| 0.66 ± 0.65 | 2.61 ± 1.5 | 2.23 ± 1.14 | 0.103 |
|
| 6.43 ± 3.2 | 4.50 ± 1.92 | 13.18 ± 1.97 |
|
|
| 0.84 ± 0.22 | 0.82 ± 0.17 | 0.52 ± 0.32 | 0.344 |
|
| 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.129 |
|
| 264.38 ± 48.87 | 262.40 ± 32.66 | 289.81 ± 35.28 | 0.858 |
|
| 2.38 ± 1.24 | 2.16 ± 1.06 | 1.94 ± 0.45 | 0.565 |
|
| 18.92 ± 3.84 | 13.17 ± 2.10 | 14.12 ± 1.48 | 0.256 |
Statistical differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (in bold). NLR, neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio; ESR, erythrocytes sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor- α, VEGF, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; IFN-γ, Interferon-γ, EGF, Epidermal Growth Factor.
Anthropometric measures and bioimpedentiometric parameters in patients at baseline, according to study groups.
| Tertile I (score 0–3) | Tertile II (score 4–5) | Tertile III (score 6–11) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n. 45 (23.2%) | n. 84 (43.3%) | n. 65 (33.5%) | ||
|
| 24.7 ± 4.9 | 27.9 ± 5.5 | 28.3 ± 4.6 |
|
|
| 23.2 ± 4.4 | 26.7 ± 5.3 | 28.6 ± 4.4 |
|
|
| 36.9 ± 7.1 | 43.6 ± 7.3 | 46.2 ± 11.1 |
|
|
| 92.4 ± 17.1 | 144.9 ± 16.8 | 105.4 ± 15.1 |
|
|
| 28.4 ± 6.8 | 32.2 ± 7.4 | 33.6 ± 5.0 |
|
|
| 41.7 ± 5.7 | 37.3 ± 4.8 | 30.6 ± 2.6 |
|
|
| 57.8 ± 6.1 | 62.6 ± 4.9 | 69.4 ± 2.6 |
|
|
| 24.6 ± 2.2 | 26.9 ± 3.1 | 33.2 ± 4.5 |
|
|
| 53.5 ± 5.8 | 55.9 ± 12.5 | 57.2 ± 9.8 | 0.709 |
|
| 53.5 ± 9.9 | 63.0 ± 12.3 | 62.9 ± 9.1 | 0.057 |
|
| 46.5 ± 9.9 | 36.9 ± 12.3 | 37.0 ± 9.1 | 0.059 |
Statistical differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (in bold). BMI, body mass index; FM, fat mass; FFM, free-fat mass; MM, muscle mass; TBW, total body water, ECW, extracellular water; ICW, intracellular water.
Figure 2Odds ratios of factors associated with in-hospital mortality in a multivariate logistic regression model applied in the entire cohort studied. MNA, mini nutritional assessment; IMI, Italian Mediterranean index; GDS-SF, geriatric depression scale-short form; ADL, activities of daily living; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; MMSE, mini-mental state examination.
Figure 3Odds ratios of factors associated with malnutrition (MNA score < 17) in a multivariate logistic regression model applied in the entire cohort studied. IMI, Italian Mediterranean index; GDS-SF, geriatric depression scale-short form; ADL, activities of daily living; IADL, instrumental activities of daily living; MMSE, mini-mental state examination.